Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 18(8): 375-9, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22018170

ABSTRACT

Adherence to local guidelines on the use of HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and hepatitis B vaccine following sexual assault was evaluated by means of audit. Forensic Medical Examiners (FMEs) were asked to complete an audit form after conducting sexual offence examinations at Gloucester Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC). Only one HIV PEP pack was prescribed during the six and a half month audit period. Examination of the SARC records of the allegations made by complainants did not reveal any high-risk cases involving a failure to offer HIV post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure (PEPSE). The majority of the examinations performed at the SARC were carried out by trained sexual offence examiners (SOEs). The audit indicates that these SOEs were considering the appropriate use of HIV PEPSE and hepatitis B vaccine when they performed examinations. Some examinations were performed by general forensic medical examiners who completed the audit forms infrequently. It was not possible to determine whether these examiners were considering the appropriate use of HIV PEPSE and hepatitis treatments.


Subject(s)
Clinical Audit , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Vaccines , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Sex Offenses , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Forms and Records Control , Guideline Adherence , HIV Infections/transmission , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...