Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hazard Mater ; 447: 130854, 2023 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36701979

ABSTRACT

This study aims to identify sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and reveals previously undescribed variability in daily PFAS concentrations by measuring their occurrence in WWTP influent each hour over the course of a week. ∑50PFAS concentrations ranged between 89 ± 38 on Monday and 173 ± 110 ng L-1 on Friday, where perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs), disubstituted phosphate esters (diPAPs), and perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs) contributed the largest proportion to overall weekly concentrations 37%, 30%, and 17% respectively. Simultaneous pulse events of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS; 400 ng L-1) and perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS; 18 ng L-1) indicate significant industrial or commercial waste discharge that persists for up to 3 h. The minimum number of hourly grab samples required to detect variation of PFOS and PFHpS concentrations are 7 and 9 samples respectively, indicating a high degree of variability in PFAS concentrations between days. Overall, the risk of sampling bias from grab samples is high given the variability in PFAS concentrations and more frequent sampling campaigns must be balanced against the cost of analysis carefully to avoid the mischaracterisation of mass flux to receiving surface waters.

2.
Sci Total Environ ; 802: 149727, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461481

ABSTRACT

This is the first study to show microplastics contamination in an alluvial sedimentary aquifer that has been capped from the atmosphere. Microplastics are often reported in biotic and abiotic environments, but little is known about their occurrence in groundwater systems. In this study, eight of the most commonly found microplastics in the environment (polyethylene, PE; polystyrene, PS; polypropylene, PP; polyvinyl chloride, PVC; polyethylene terephthalate, PET; polycarbonate, PC; polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA; and polyamide, PA) were analysed in triplicate groundwater samples (n = 21) from five sampling sites across seven capped groundwater monitoring bores from Bacchus Marsh (Victoria, Australia) using Agilent's novel Laser Direct Infra-Red (LDIR) imaging system. Microplastics were detected in all samples, with PE, PP, PS and PVC detected in all seven bores. The average size of the microplastics identified was 89 ± 55 µm (St.Dev.), ranging from 18 to 491 µm. The average number of microplastics detected across all sites was 38 ± 8 microplastics/L, ranging from 16 to 97 particles/L. PE and PVC in total contributed to 59% of the total sum of microplastics detected. PE was consistently detected in all seven bores (average: 11 particles/L), while PVC was more pronounced in a bore adjacent to a meat processor (52 particles/L) compared to that of its overall average of 12 particles/L. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between PVC and PS (R = 0.934, p ≤0.001). As this study collected samples from capped groundwater bores, the most probable avenue for microplastics was permeation through soil. Therefore, to further understand the fate and transport of microplastics within a groundwater system, it is necessary to analyse a greater range of groundwater bores not only from Australia but throughout the world.


Subject(s)
Groundwater , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Environmental Monitoring , Microplastics , Plastics , Victoria , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...