Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 51(4): 280-7, 1994 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8161288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We studied the effectiveness of treating patients with low doses of fluphenazine decanoate and supplementing them with oral fluphenazine when there was evidence of prodromal symptoms of psychotic exacerbations. METHODS: Eighty schizophrenic patients who were receiving 5 to 10 mg of fluphenazine decanoate every 2 weeks were monitored for prodromal symptoms using an idiosyncratic prodromal rating scale. When patients met our criteria for a prodromal episode, they were randomly assigned to a double-blind comparison of oral fluphenazine hydrochloride (5 mg twice daily) or a placebo for the current and future prodromal episodes. We compared rates of psychotic exacerbations in the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (45%) met the criteria for a prodrome at some point during the trial and were randomized to drug or placebo. Using survival analysis during the entire 2 years, we did not find a significant difference between fluphenazine and placebo in the likelihood that a prodrome would continue to an exacerbation. Survival analysis beginning at the start of the second year of treatment did indicate a significant reduction in exacerbation risk for patients receiving drug supplementation (P = .032). Similarly, there was no difference between the two groups in the proportion of time at risk spent in exacerbation during the first year, but patients receiving active drug supplementation spent less time in an exacerbated state in the second year (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment strategy appeared to be effective for some patients, particularly those who were able to remain in the study beyond the first year. Although the occurrence of a prodrome was a fairly good marker that a patient was at high risk of ultimate exacerbation with our low-dose maintenance protocol, prodromes were not highly sensitive indicators of imminent exacerbation.


Subject(s)
Fluphenazine/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Fluphenazine/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Placebos , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Br J Psychiatry ; 162: 751-4, 1993 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8330106

ABSTRACT

Thirty-nine chronic schizophrenic male out-patients and their relatives were interviewed separately to assess their perceptions of their current relationships. Two simple 5-point rating scales predicted the risk of psychotic exacerbation during a one-year follow-up: patients' perceptions of the relatives' attitudes towards them, and patients' own attitudes towards the relatives. Survival analysis of data in a 2 x 2 factorial--combining degree of contact with the key relatives and the patients' perceptions of their relatives--found that patients in frequent contact with a positively perceived relative had significantly better survival rates without psychotic exacerbation. Patients' perceptions of their relatives may help identify patients at risk of exacerbation of their illness.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Deinstitutionalization , Family/psychology , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Personality Assessment , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Rejection, Psychology , Risk Factors
3.
Am J Psychiatry ; 149(11): 1549-55, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1384364

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether schizophrenic outpatients receiving low-dose neuroleptic therapy could learn and retain complex information and skills related to self-management of their illness, a novel technique of teaching, using cognitive and behavioral methods, was designed to compensate for the patients' learning disabilities. METHOD: The subjects were 41 patients with DSM-III-R schizophrenia who were receiving constant maintenance neuroleptic drug therapy. They were randomly assigned to structured, modularized skills training or to supportive group psychotherapy. RESULTS: The patients who received skills training made significant gains in each of the areas taught, while those participating in group therapy did not. The skills learned during training were retained without significant erosion over a 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of modularized teaching of illness self-management skills to schizophrenic patients appears to be largely independent of baseline psychology and symptom improvement. Such an approach is useful for overcoming or compensating for the enduring cognitive and information processing deficits commonly found in schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Patient Education as Topic/methods , Schizophrenia/therapy , Self Care , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Audiovisual Aids , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotherapy, Group , Role Playing , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Schizophrenic Psychology , Teaching Materials
4.
Psychopharmacol Bull ; 27(1): 79-82, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1862209

ABSTRACT

We compared different methods of identifying prodromal periods with regard to their ability to predict relapse in schizophrenia. Fifty stabilized schizophrenic patients, who received a low dose of schizophrenic patients, who received a low dose of fluphenazine decanoate (5 to 10 mg every 2 weeks) were monitored with weekly evaluations to determine whether they met criteria for nonpsychotic prodromal episodes. We evaluated three different scales: (1) the Anxious-Depression subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); (2) a modification of the patient self-report Early Signs Questionnaire and (3) the Idiosyncratic Prodromal Scale (IPS). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods for comparing the different instruments as methods for predicting whether patients would or would not demonstrate a psychotic exacerbation in the 4 weeks following the assessment. Both the IPS and the BPRS cluster scores were better than chance at correctly identifying periods of vulnerability to psychotic exacerbation. The ROC analyses suggest that relatively small changes in the signs and symptoms of chronic schizophrenic patients in maintenance treatment may be clinically meaningful.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenic Psychology , Humans , Prognosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...