Loneliness in older age: What is it, why is it happening and what should we do about it in Australia?

Loneliness is an important health issue facing older people due to its association with poor quality of life and poor health outcomes. This paper aimed to clarify key issues around loneliness among older adults and draw attention to innovative programs and the translation of emerging research into practice. Loneliness is a mismatch between a person's actual and desired social connections, experienced as negative emotions. Older adults are vulnerable to loneliness because of changes associated with ageing. As such, identifying as older is often seen as a burden, negatively impacting self-esteem, sense of purpose and relevance, culminating in loneliness. Interventions combatting loneliness can target individuals, relationships, communities or societies. We advocate for an intersectoral approach to support healthy ageing and reduce loneliness. This will require further research to evaluate new approaches with loneliness as the primary outcome, and additional funding to translate evidence into an integrated multi-level approach to addressing loneliness.

Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.

For many populations at risk of social isolation, including Older Women Living Alone (OWLA), existing services to maintain independence and optimise well-being are difficult to access, unsuitable or unavailable. Co-creation is a strategy to develop 'person-centred' services that meet the needs of individuals. We adapted an existing framework for co-creation and used participatory action research methods, supported by an evidence base comprising a systematic review, analysis of routinely collected data and interviews, to develop person-centred services for OWLA. This approach achieved co-creation through an iterative process of consultation and review, involving a series of facilitated discussions with women living alone and stakeholders. A total of 13 women living alone, aged ≥55 years, and 11 stakeholders representing service providers and advocacy groups, were recruited to participate in these discussions. Sessions with between three and five OWLA, were held across Melbourne. The information was compiled and presented to service stakeholders in a single facilitated forum, held in central Melbourne. Smaller facilitated sessions with OWLA followed, to review and discuss the collated service stakeholder input. The information from these OWLA sessions were again compiled and directed back to the service stakeholders for consideration and further discussion. The two groups came together for a final forum to prioritise the co-created ten services that they believed would be feasible and would address unmet need to support OWLA maintain independence. The process of co-creation was time-consuming and required considerable preparation to facilitate input from the target population. Small groups, gathering at convenient local locations, with transport support were essential in removing barriers to participation. However, co-creation was a viable method of eliciting the women's preferences and developing services more likely to meet their needs.

Using co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis to close service gaps for underserved populations.

BACKGROUND: Navigating treatment pathways remains a challenge for populations with complex needs due to bottlenecks, service gaps and access barriers. The application of novel methods may be required to identify and remedy such problems. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a novel approach to identifying persistent service gaps, generating potential solutions and prioritizing action. DESIGN: Co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis in the context of a larger, mixed methods study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling sample of older women living alone (OWLA), residing in Melbourne, Australia (n = 13-37). Convenience sample of (n = 11) representatives from providers and patient organizations. INTERVENTIONS: Novel interventions co-created to support health, well-being and independence for OWLA and bridge missing links in pathways to care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance criteria, criterion weights , performance ratings, summary scores and ranks reflecting the relative value of interventions to OWLA. RESULTS: The co-creation process generated a list of ten interventions. Both OWLA and stakeholders considered a broad range of criteria when evaluating the relative merits of these ten interventions and a "Do Nothing" alternative. Combining criterion weights with performance ratings yielded a consistent set of high priority interventions, with "Handy Help," "Volunteer Drivers" and "Exercise Buddies" most highly ranked by both OWLA and stakeholder samples. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The present study described and demonstrated the use of multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize a set of novel interventions generated via a co-creation process. Application of this approach can add community voice to the policy debate and begin to bridge the gap in service provision for underserved populations.

Weight stigmatisation in antiobesity campaigns: The role of images.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Antiobesity campaigns may inadvertently stigmatise individuals with obesity via the use of images that portray negative obesity stereotypes. This study investigated the impact of images on weight stigma using mock antiobesity campaigns featuring different types of images. METHODS: Participants (N = 240) were randomly assigned to one of four campaign conditions: stereotypical images, counter-stereotypical images, neutral images, or no images. All four conditions used the same nonstigmatising message text. Participants indicated their attitudes towards being in social situations (desired social distance) with the target featured in the images, or individuals with obesity (no images), rated the target or individuals with obesity on various traits, and indicated to what extent the campaign was motivating and stigmatising. RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed that the stereotypical images were rated as the most stigmatising and were also associated with higher negative and lower positive trait ratings of the target and more desired social distance from the target. Neutral images generally produced the least weight stigma. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider the impact of antiobesity campaign images that depict common obesity stereotypes. Developing, testing and disseminating nonstigmatising campaigns is important to reduce stigma and better engage individuals with antiobesity public health messages. SO WHAT?: Weight stigma has negative consequences for physical and psychological health, which may undermine obesity intervention efforts. Stereotypical images that blame individuals for their weight reinforce obesity stigma and are likely to be in-effective in increasing healthier behaviour and reducing obesity. The development of effective antiobesity campaigns should be a public health priority.