A Staged Approach for Surgical Management of Basilar Invagination.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with basilar invagination (BI) can be treated with several surgical options, ranging from simple posterior decompression to circumferential decompression and fusion. Here, we aimed at examining the indications and outcomes associated with these surgical strategies to devise a staged algorithm for managing BI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 neurosurgical centers and included patients with a BI, as defined by a position of the dens tip at least 5 mm above the Chamberlain line. Other craniovertebral junction anomalies, such as atlas assimilation, platybasia, and Chiari malformations, were documented. C1-C2 stability was assessed with a dynamic computed tomography scan. RESULTS: We included 30 patients with BI with a mean follow-up of 56 months (min = 12, max = 166). Posterior decompression and fusion (n = 8) was only performed in cases of obvious atlanto-axial instability (eg, increased atlanto-dental interval or hypermobility on flexion/extension), while anterior decompression (transoral or transnasal) was reserved to patients with lower cranial nerves deficits (eg, swallowing dysfunction) and irreducible anterior compression (n = 9). Patients with posterior signs (eg, Valsalva headaches) or myelopathy but without C1-C2 instability nor anterior signs were managed with an isolated foramen magnum decompression, with or without duraplasty (n = 13). Complications were more frequent for combined procedures, including neurological deterioriation (n = 4) and tracheostomy (n = 2), but reinterventions were more likely in patients undergoing posterior decompression alone (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Patient selection is key to determine the appropriate surgical strategy for BI: In our experience, combined approaches are only needed for patients with irreducible and symptomatic anterior compression, while fusion should be restricted to patient with obvious signs of atlanto-axial instability. Other BI patients can be managed by foramen magnum decompression alone to minimize surgical morbidity.

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma: Learning curve and surgical results in a prospective series during initial experience.

Background: To report the initial experience of surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) from a neurosurgeon in a dedicated residency training endoscopic transsphenoidal (ETS) program, and detail the surgical and clinical outcomes during this period. Methods: A prospective series of all patients operated for NFPA, using an ETS approach, during the three first years of experience of a newly board-certified neurosurgeon was analysed. Clinical, radiological and peri-operative data were collected. Extent of resection (EOR) was determined by formal volumetric analysis. Impact of the learning curve and predictive factors of gross total resection (GTR) were determined. Results: Fifty-three patients with NFPA were included in this prospective cohort which was divided in two periods of time ("First period": 30 first cases, and "second period": 23 following cases). Baseline characteristics of the patients in the two periods were similar. Overall occurrence of complication was 22% and was not significantly different in the two periods of time. No patient had severe neurological complication. Gross total resection was achieved in 70% of patients. Mean Extent of resection was 96%. In a multiple linear regression model, a higher EOR was positively correlated with experience (p = 0.018) and negatively correlated with Knosp Score equal to 4 (p < 0.001). Predictive factors for GTR were Higher Knosp grade (p = 0,01), higher pre-operative volume (p = 0.03), and second period of time (p = 0.01). Conclusion: NFPA surgery can be safe and efficient during the learning period. Dedicated intensive learning, careful patient selection and multidisciplinary work are key to shorten the learning curve and achieve satisfactory results.

Posterior Midline Approach for a C2 Schwannoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

C2 schwannomas are rare lesions that may develop in the spinal canal, in the area of the C2 ganglion situated posterior to the C1C2 articulation, in the extraspinal area or in a combination of these 3 sectors.1,2 The surgical removal of these lesions is delicate because of the intimate relationships the schwannomas develop with the V3 segment of the vertebral artery. A variety of lateral, far-lateral, or extreme lateral approaches have been described in order to tackle these lesions. We use a posterior midline approach that takes advantage of the predominantly extradural development of C2 schwannomas. In this technique, the main step is the debulking of the posterior articular sector of the tumor, which is easily accessible through a midline posterior approach and necessitates minimal bone removal. In most cases, removal of the homolateral posterior arch of C1 is sufficient in order to create an adequate access. These maneuvers create the necessary space for dissecting both the intradural and extraspinal sectors of the schwannoma. We present this technique through a case with a minimal intradural component exerting mainly a lateral compression of the spinal cord. The tumor was operated through the midline mini-invasive posterior approach with a favorable result. We demonstrate the surgical technique in video and discuss the nuances.