Previous radiotherapy improves treatment responses and causes a trend toward longer time to progression among patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequently encountered by patients during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and are associated with better treatment outcomes. The sequencing of radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs is widely used in current clinical practice, but its effect on survival has remained unclear. METHODS: In a real-world multicenter study including 521 patients who received ICI treatment for metastatic or locally advanced cancer, RT schedules and timing, irAEs, time to progression, overall survival, and treatment responses were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients who received previous RT and developed irAE (RT +/AE +) had the best overall response rate (ORR 44.0%). The ORR was 40.1% in the RT -/AE + group, 26.7% in the RT -/AE - group and 18.3% in the RT + /AE - group (p < 0.001). There was a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) in the RT + /AE + group compared to the RT -/AE - and RT + /AE - groups (log rank p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), but the trend toward longer TTP in the RT + /AE + group did not reach statistical significance in pairwise comparison to that in the RT -/AE + group. Preceding RT timing and intent had no statistically significant effect on TTP. In a multivariate model, ECOG = 0 and occurrence of irAEs remained independent positive prognostic factors for TTP (HR 0.737; 95% CI 0.582-0.935; p = 0.012, and HR 0.620; 95% CI 0.499-0.769; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Better ORR and a trend toward longer TTP were demonstrated for patients with RT preceding ICI treatment and development of irAEs, which suggests that RT may boost the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancers.

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD)-Based Immunochemotherapy for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL), Early Results of a Phase II Study.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a rare but aggressive brain malignancy. It is associated with poor prognosis even with the current standard of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and tolerability of blood-brain barrier disruption treatment combined with high-dose treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation on primary central nervous system lymphoma patients. We performed a prospective phase II study for 25 patients with previously untreated primary central nervous system lymphoma. The blood-brain barrier disruption treatment was initiated 3-4 weeks after the MATRix regimen using the previously optimized therapy protocol. Briefly, each chemotherapy cycle included two subsequent intra-arterial blood-brain barrier disruption treatments on days 1 and 2 via either one of the internal carotid arteries or vertebral arteries. Patients received the therapy in 3-week intervals. The treatment was continued for two more courses after achieving a maximal radiological response to the maximum of six courses. The complete treatment response was observed in 88.0% of the patients. At the median follow-up time of 30 months, median progression-free and overall survivals were not reached. The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 67.1% and 70.3%, respectively. Blood-brain barrier disruption treatment is a promising option for primary central nervous system lymphoma with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Assessment of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity using a point-of-care nerve conduction study device.

BACKGROUND: Management for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) includes prompt recognition and dose reduction or discontinuation of the neurotoxic agents. CIPN remains under-detected in routine clinical practice and better methods for its early detection are warranted. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility of a point-of-care device in the early detection of CIPN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cancer patients (n = 12) scheduled to receive neurotoxic chemotherapy docetaxel, oxaliplatin (OX), or vincristine were recruited for the pilot study (NCT04778878). The patients were assessed with a point-of-care nerve conduction study device (Mediracer® NCS), EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and NPSI questionnaires, and healthcare professional-assessed CTCAE-based grading at baseline and thereafter every 6-weeks up to 18 weeks or until chemotherapy discontinuation. The set-up of point-of-care device was easy but it only provide successful NCS measurement results in 55% of the patients. The factors related to failed measurement were older age, more frequent comorbidities, and a history of smoking. With the follow-up measurements, decreasing median nerve mean conduction velocity and amplitude, and increasing median nerve mean distal latency were detected on OX-patients. Of the used questionnaires, NPSI was found to be non-feasible with majority of the patients failing to complete the questionnaire while CIPN20 was feasible on all the subjects. CIPN20 score did not show any changes in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care assessment for NCS was feasible but measurements frequently failed especially on patients with pre-existing high-risk for neuropathy. OX-treated showed decreasing NCS results while other measures were unable to access the change. The system should be further validated with a larger patient cohort preferably treated with OX and low-risk for pre-existing neuropathy.

Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity and its risk factors in real-world setting of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Cardiotoxicity is the most important side effect of trastuzumab treatment. Heart function monitoring is recommended during the treatment which has led to growing use of resources. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the frequency and timing of trastuzumab cardiotoxicity and its risk factors in real-world setting. METHODS: Single institute, retrospective collection of data on HER2+ breast cancer patients (n = 246) was carried out through a pharmacy search for patients who had received trastuzumab in 2006-2014. Clinical and pathological factors, treatment history, EF measurements, cardiac medications, cardiovascular disease history, cardiac symptoms, and survival data were collected from patient records. RESULTS: 32 patients (13%) had EF decline ≥ 10%, eleven (4.5%) had EF decline ≥ 20% within 1 year after trastuzumab initiation, and trastuzumab was discontinued due to suspected cardiotoxicity in six patients (2.4%). 49 patients (19.9%) experienced symptoms related to cardiotoxicity during therapy, which accumulated among those with EF drop. Underlying cardiovascular diseases and multiple (≥ 2) cardiac medications were related to EF drop (≥ 20%) and trastuzumab discontinuation. Majority of EF drops (≥ 10%) and trastuzumab discontinuations were seen within 6months of trastuzumab initiation and recovery of EF drop to < 10% of the baseline was seen in most cases (62.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of patients according to EF drop. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab cardiotoxicity seems to accumulate among patients with underlying cardiac conditions. EF monitoring could be targeted to risk groups without compromising of the cardiac health or survival of HER2-positive breast cancer patients.