Multiple sclerosis in the elderly: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge of disease course, prognosis, comorbidities and potential treatments of elderly MS patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the disease course including disability progression and relapses, to quantify the use of DMTs and to identify comorbidities and risk factors for progression in elderly multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 1200 Austrian MS patients older than 55 years as of May 1st, 2017 representing roughly one-third of all the MS patients of this age in Austria. Data were collected from 15 MS centers including demographics, first symptom at onset, number of relapses, evolvement of disability, medication, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Median observation time was 17.1 years with 957 (80%) relapsing and 243 (20%) progressive onsets. Average age at diagnosis was 45 years with a female predominance of 71%. Three-hundred and twenty-six (27%) patients were never treated with a DMT, while most treated patients received interferons (496; 41%) at some point. At last follow-up, 420 (35%) patients were still treated with a DMT. No difference was found between treated and never-treated patients in terms of clinical outcome; however, patients with worse disability progression had significantly more DMT switches. Pyramidal onset, number of comorbidities, dementia, epilepsy, and psychiatric conditions as well as a higher number of relapses were associated with worse outcome. The risk of reaching EDSS 6 rose with every additional comorbidity by 22%. In late and very-late-onset MS (LOMS, VLOMS) time to diagnosis took nearly twice the time compared to adult and early onset (AEOMS). The overall annualized relapse rate (ARR) decreased over time and patients with AEOMS had significantly higher ARR compared to LOMS and VLOMS. Four percent of MS patients had five medications or more fulfilling criteria of polypharmacy and 20% of psychiatric drugs were administered without a matching diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we identified number of comorbidities, pyramidal and cerebellar signs, and a higher number of relapses as unfavorable prognostic factors in elderly MS patients filling gaps of knowledge in patients usually underrepresented in clinical trials and may guide future therapeutic studies.

The pathology of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease accompanying myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody.

We sought to define the pathological features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disorders (MOGAD) in an archival autopsy/biopsy cohort. We histopathologically analyzed 2 autopsies and 22 brain biopsies from patients with CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases seropositive for MOG-antibody by live-cell-based-assay with full length MOG in its conformational form. MOGAD autopsies (ages 52 and 67) demonstrate the full spectrum of histopathological features observed within the 22 brain biopsies (median age, 10 years; range, 1-66; 56% female). Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory characteristics and course (78% relapsing) are consistent with MOGAD. MOGAD pathology is dominated by coexistence of both perivenous and confluent white matter demyelination, with an over-representation of intracortical demyelinated lesions compared to typical MS. Radially expanding confluent slowly expanding smoldering lesions in the white matter as seen in MS, are not present. A CD4+ T-cell dominated inflammatory reaction with granulocytic infiltration predominates. Complement deposition is present in all active white matter lesions, but a preferential loss of MOG is not observed. AQP4 is preserved, with absence of dystrophic astrocytes, and variable oligodendrocyte and axonal destruction. MOGAD is pathologically distinguished from AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD, but shares some overlapping features with both MS and ADEM, suggesting a transitional pathology. Complement deposition in the absence of selective MOG protein loss suggest humoral mechanisms are involved, however argue against endocytic internalization of the MOG antigen. Parallels with MOG-EAE suggest MOG may be an amplification factor that augments CNS demyelination, possibly via complement mediated destruction of myelin or ADCC phagocytosis.