Projections from the amygdaloid complex to the magnocellular cholinergic basal forebrain in rat.

The amygdaloid complex has a key role in the modulation of behavioral responses in life-threatening situations, including the direction of attentional responses to sensory stimuli. The pathways from the amygdala to the basal forebrain cholinergic system, which projects to the cortex, are proposed to contribute to the modulation. To further explore the topography and postsynaptic targets of these pathways, we investigated the projections from the different divisions of the lateral, basal, accessory basal, and central nuclei of the amygdala to the cholinergic basal forebrain in rat using a sensitive anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. The most substantial projections from the amygdala to the basal forebrain are directed to the ventrolateral and dorsomedial aspects of the substantia innominata and the fundus of the striatum. The heaviest projections originate in the capsular, lateral, and intermediate divisions of the central nucleus as well as in the magnocellular and parvicellular divisions of the basal nucleus. Light microscopic analysis of double-stained preparations revealed that the distribution of amygdaloid efferents and cholinergic neurons overlaps most prominently in the ventrolateral substantia innominata. Despite the fact that the central nucleus efferents and cholinergic elements overlap in the ventrolateral substantia innominata, electron microscopic analysis revealed, first, that the postsynaptic targets of the central nucleus efferents are non-cholinergic, probably GABAergic, neurons. Second, 80% of the synaptic contacts were symmetric. The present data extend previous observations showing that the different amygdaloid nuclei provide projections to the selective basal forebrain areas. Further, the central nucleus efferents modulate cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain indirectly via the GABAergic interneurons.

Projections from the amygdalo-piriform transition area to the amygdaloid complex: a PHA-l study in rat.

The amygdalo-piriform transition area is a poorly defined region in the temporal lobe that is heavily connected with the olfactory system. As part of an ongoing project aimed at understanding the neuronal pathways that provide sensory information to the amygdala, we investigated the cytoarchitectonic and chemoarchitectonic features of the amygdalo-piriform transition area and its connections to the amygdaloid complex in 13 rats by using the anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin. Our analysis indicates that the amygdalo-piriform transition area has medial (rostral and caudal portions) and lateral parts. The rostromedial part projects heavily to the intermediate and lateral divisions of the central nucleus, whereas the caudomedial part projects mainly to the medial division. The lateral part of the amygdalo-piriform transition area projects heavily to the capsular and lateral divisions of the central nucleus. Electron microscopic analysis revealed that the projection to the lateral division of the central nucleus forms asymmetric contacts with the spines and shafts of postsynaptic neurons and, therefore, is assumed to be excitatory. The amygdalo-piriform transition area also projects moderately to other amygdaloid nuclei, including the parvicellular division of the basal nucleus, the anterior cortical nucleus, and the nucleus of the lateral olfactory tract. The lateral and medial parts of the amygdalo-piriform transition area also project to the distal temporal CA1 and distal temporal subiculum, respectively. Unlike the adjacent entorhinal cortex, the amygdalo-piriform transition area does not project to the dentate gyrus. These data suggest that the amygdalo-piriform transition area is a region that influences both emotional and memory processing in parallel by means of pathways to the amygdala and the hippocampus, respectively.

Interconnectivity between the amygdaloid complex and the amygdalostriatal transition area: a PHA-L study in rat.

The amygdala orchestrates the formation of behavioral responses to emotionally arousing stimuli. Many of these responses are initiated by the central nucleus, which converges information from other amygdaloid nuclei. Recently, we observed substantial projections from the amygdala to the amygdalostriatal transition area, which is located dorsal to the central nucleus. These projections led us to question whether the amygdalostriatal transition area has a role in the initiation of behavioral responses in emotionally arousing circumstances. To explore this anatomically, we traced the interconnections between the amygdalostriatal transition area and the amygdaloid complex using the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin. The lateral (the medial division and the caudal portion of the dorsolateral division) and the accessory basal nuclei (the parvicellular division) provide moderate-to-heavy projections to the amygdalostriatal transition area. Projections back to the amygdala are light and are composed of thin, faintly stained varicose fibers that resemble the labeling of cholinergic terminals. The extra-amygdaloid outputs of the amygdalostriatal transition area are sparse and include moderate projections to the caudoventral globus pallidus, the ansa lenticularis, and the substantia nigra pars lateralis. These data suggest that the amygdalostriatal transition area is one of the major targets for projections originating in the lateral and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala. Via these pathways, emotionally significant stimuli can evoke behavioral responses that are different from those initiated via projections from the amygdala to the central nucleus. One such candidate response is the orienting response (i.e., saccadic eye movements and head direction) in a pathway that includes a projection from the lateral/accessory basal nucleus of the amygdala to the amygdalostriatal transition area, and from there to the substantia nigra, pars lateralis.

Projections from the central nucleus of the amygdala to the gastric related area of the dorsal vagal complex: a Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin study in rat.

Electrophysiological and anatomic studies suggest that the amygdala regulates gastrointestinal motility and gastric acid secretion via projections to the dorsal vagal complex. The topography of these projections is poorly understood. Here, these projections were investigated by injecting anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin, into the different divisions of the central nucleus of the amygdala in 13 rats. The distribution of immunohistochemically labeled terminals in the different portions of the dorsal vagal complex was analyzed. We found that (1) the dorsal aspect of the medial division of the central nucleus provided moderate projections to the dorsal vagal complex; (2) the heaviest projections terminated in the parvicellular and medial divisions of the nucleus of the solitary tract. These data suggest that via topographically organized projections, the amygdala can modulate the vago-vagal gastrointestinal reflexes in emotional and stressful situations.

Anatomic heterogeneity of the rat amygdaloid complex.

The amygdala is a nuclear complex composed of 13 nuclei and cortical areas and their subdivisions. Tract-tracing studies performed over the past 20 years demonstrate that each nucleus is uniquely connected with other brain areas. Consistent with anatomic heterogeneity, the functions of the amygdala vary from attention to memory to formation of emotional responses to sensory stimuli. Here, we briefly review the principles of amygdaloid neuronal wiring that underlie the computations necessary to perform such complex behavioural functions.

Effects of vigabatrin treatment on status epilepticus-induced neuronal damage and mossy fiber sprouting in the rat hippocampus.

Selective neuronal damage and mossy fiber sprouting may underlie epileptogenesis and spontaneous seizure generation in the epileptic hippocampus. It may be beneficial to prevent their development after cerebral insults that are known to be associated with a high risk of epilepsy later in life in humans. In the present study, we investigated whether chronic treatment with an anticonvulsant, vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA), would prevent the damage to hilar neurons and the development of mossy fiber sprouting. Vigabatrin treatment was started either 1 h, or 2 or 7 days after the beginning of kainic acid-induced (9 mg/kg, i.p.) status epilepticus and continued via subcutaneous osmotic minipumps for 2 months (75 mg/kg per day). Thereafter, rats were perfused for histological analyses. One series of horizontal sections was stained with thionine to estimate the total number of hilar neurons by unbiased stereology. One series was prepared for somatostatin immunohistochemistry and another for Timm histochemistry to detect mossy fiber sprouting. Our data show that vigabatrin treatment did not prevent the decrease in the total number of hilar cells, nor the decrease in hilar somatostatin-immunoreactive (SOM-ir) neurons when SOM-ir neuronal numbers were averaged from all septotemporal levels. However, when vigabatrin was administered 2 days after the onset of status epilepticus, we found a mild neuroprotective effect on SOM-ir neurons in the septal end of the hippocampus (92% SOM-ir neurons remaining; P < 0.05 compared to the vehicle group). Vigabatrin did not prevent mossy fiber sprouting regardless of when treatment was started. Rather, sprouting actually increased in the septal end of the hippocampus when vigabatrin treatment began 1 h after the onset of status epilepticus (P < 0.05 compared to the vehicle group). Our data show that chronic elevation of brain GABA levels after status epilepticus does not have any substantial effects on neuronal loss or mossy fiber sprouting in the rat hippocampus.

Intrinsic connections of the rat amygdaloid complex: projections originating in the central nucleus.

Inputs from the amygdaloid and extraamygdaloid areas terminate in various divisions of the central nucleus. To elucidate the interconnections between the different regions of the central nucleus and its connectivity with the other amygdaloid areas, we injected the anterograde tracer, Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) into the capsular, lateral, intermediate, and medial divisions of the central nucleus in rat. There were a number of labeled terminals near the injection site within each division. The intrinsic connections between the various divisions of the central nucleus were organized topographically and originated primarily in the lateral division, which projected to the capsular and medial divisions. Most of the connections were unidirectional, except in the capsular division, which received a light reciprocal projection from its efferent target, the medial division. The intermediate division did not project to any of the other divisions of the central nucleus. Extrinsic projections from the central nucleus to the other amygdaloid nuclei were meager. Light projections were observed in the parvicellular division of the basal nucleus, the anterior cortical nucleus, the amygdalohippocampal area, and the anterior amygdaloid area. No projections to the contralateral amygdala were found. These data show that the central nucleus has a dense network of topographically organized intradivisional and interdivisional connections that may integrate the intraamygdaloid and extraamygdaloid information entering the different regions of the central nucleus. The sparse reciprocal connections to the other amygdaloid nuclei suggest that the central nucleus does not regulate the other amygdaloid regions but, rather, executes the responses evoked by the other amygdaloid nuclei that innervate the central nucleus.

Seizure-induced damage to somatostatin-immunoreactive neurons in the rat hippocampus is regulated by fimbria-fornix transection.

In both experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy, seizures cause loss of hilar somatostatin-immunoreactive (SOM-ir) neurons and sprouting of mossy fibers. To investigate whether in rats these alterations are modulated by hippocampal input projections, we transected the fimbria-fornix or the perforant pathway bilaterally 2 days after seizures induced by systemic administration of kainic acid (9 mg/kg, i.p.). Two months later, the number of SOM-ir neurons in the hilus was counted and mossy fiber sprouting in the supragranular area and in the inner molecular layer was analyzed. In seizured rats with sham-operation, 50% of the hilar SOM-ir neurons were left in the septal end of the hippocampus and only 16% remained in the temporal end. In seizured rats with transection of the fimbria-fornix, the number of hilar SOM-ir neurons in the septal end of the hippocampus did not differ from that in controls (98% of SOM-ir neurons left). However, the temporal end was severely damaged (41% of SOM-ir neurons left). In seizured rats with transection of the perforant pathway, 61% of the hilar SOM-ir neurons were left in the septal end and 51% in the temporal end of the hippocampus. Mossy fiber sprouting was evident throughout the septotemporal axis of the hippocampus in all seizured rats. Our results suggest that in the septal end of the hippocampus the severity of neuronal damage in the hilus is modulated by mechanism(s) that are dependent on the afferent pathways entering the hippocampus via the fimbria-fornix. Transection of the fimbria-fornix, however, does not significantly modulate the severity or the target regions of seizure-induced sprouting of mossy fibers.

Seizure-induced damage to the hippocampus is prevented by modulation of the GABAergic system.

A variety of cerebral insults induce neuronal damage to the hippocampal formation. The somatostatin-immunoreactive (SOM-ir) neurones in the dentate hilus are particularly vulnerable. In the present study, we demonstrated that augmentation of hippocampal GABAergic inhibition by chronic infusion of gamma-vinyl GABA prevented the delayed seizure-induced damage to hilar SOM-ir neurones. Selective lesions of the cholinergic, serotonergic or noradrenergic pathways to the hippocampus did not attenuate the seizure-induced loss of SOM-ir neurones; rather, the damage was exacerbated by the cholinergic lesion. It is, therefore, the intrahippocampal GABAergic circuitries, rather than the selective subcortical pathways, that are critical for neuroprotection after seizures. Enhanced GABAergic inhibition in the hippocampus prevented damage to hilar SOM-ir neurones, even when started 2 days after status epilepticus. GABAergic agents may thus provide an alternative treatment for delayed neuronal damage caused by cerebral insults.