Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(12): 1966-1971, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37381734

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared the individual-level risk of hospital-onset infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospitalized patients prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We also quantified the effects of COVID-19 diagnoses and intrahospital COVID-19 burden on subsequent MDRO infection risk. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Patient admission and clinical data were collected from 4 hospitals in the St. Louis area. PATIENTS: Data were collected for patients admitted between January 2017 and August 2020, discharged no later than September 2020, and hospitalized ≥48 hours. METHODS: Mixed-effects logistic regression models were fit to the data to estimate patients' individual-level risk of infection with MDRO pathogens of interest during hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from regression models to quantify the effects of the COVID-19 period, COVID-19 diagnosis, and hospital-level COVID-19 burden on individual-level hospital-onset MDRO infection probabilities. RESULTS: We calculated adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19-era hospital-onset Acinetobacter spp., P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae spp infections. Probabilities increased 2.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-5.73) times, 1.44 (95% CI, 1.03-2.02) times, and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.00-1.58) times relative to the prepandemic period, respectively. COVID-19 patients were 4.18 (95% CI, 1.98-8.81) times more likely to acquire hospital-onset MDRO S. aureus infections. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the growing body of evidence indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased hospital-onset MDRO infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Enterobacteriaceae Infections , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Cohort Studies , COVID-19 Testing , Staphylococcus aureus , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Delivery of Health Care , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
2.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 70(5): 393-402, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37029504

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens reduces the effectiveness of these drugs in both human and veterinary medicine, making judicious antimicrobial use (AMU) an important strategy for its control. The COVID-19 pandemic modified operations in both human and veterinary healthcare delivery, potentially impacting AMU. The goal of this research is to quantify how antimicrobial drug prescribing practices for companion animals in an academic veterinary hospital changed during the pandemic. A retrospective study was performed using prescribing data for dogs and cats collected from the NC State College of Veterinary Medicine (NCSU-CVM) pharmacy, which included prescriptions from both the specialty referral hospital and primary care services. Records (n = 31,769) for 34 antimicrobial drugs from 2019-2020-before and during the pandemic-related measures at the NCSU-CVM-were compared. The prescribed antimicrobials' importance was categorized using the FDA's Guidance for Industry (GFI #152), classifying drugs according to medical importance in humans. A proportional odds model was used to estimate the probability of more important antimicrobials being administered in patients seen during the pandemic versus before (i.e., critically important vs. highly important vs. important). Rates of AMU per week and per patient visit were also compared. During the pandemic, cumulative antimicrobials prescribed per week were significantly decreased in most services for dogs. Weekly rates for Highly Important antimicrobials were also significantly lower in dogs. For important and critically important antimicrobials, rates per week were significantly decreased in various services overall. Rates of antimicrobial administration per patient visit were significantly increased for Highly Important drugs. Patients in the internal medicine, dermatology, and surgery services received significantly more important antimicrobials during the pandemic than before, while cardiology patients received significantly less. These results suggest that the pandemic significantly impacted prescribing practices of antimicrobials for companion animals in this study.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Humans , Cats , Animals , Dogs , Pets , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, Animal , North Carolina , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL