Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20215863

ABSTRACT

Case studies have revealed neurological problems in severely affected COVID-19 patients. However, there is little information regarding the nature and broader prevalence of cognitive problems post-infection or across the full spread of severity. We analysed cognitive test data from 84,285 Great British Intelligence Test participants who completed a questionnaire regarding suspected and biologically confirmed COVID-19 infection. People who had recovered, including those no longer reporting symptoms, exhibited significant cognitive deficits when controlling for age, gender, education level, income, racial-ethnic group and pre-existing medical disorders. They were of substantial effect size for people who had been hospitalised, but also for mild but biologically confirmed cases who reported no breathing difficulty. Finer grained analyses of performance support the hypothesis that COVID-19 has a multi-system impact on human cognition. Significance statementThere is evidence that COVID-19 may cause long term health changes past acute symptoms, termed long COVID. Our analyses of detailed cognitive assessment and questionnaire data from tens thousands of datasets, collected in collaboration with BBC2 Horizon, align with the view that there are chronic cognitive consequences of having COVID-19. Individuals who recovered from suspected or confirmed COVID-19 perform worse on cognitive tests in multiple domains than would be expected given their detailed age and demographic profiles. This deficit scales with symptom severity and is evident amongst those without hospital treatment. These results should act as a clarion call for more detailed research investigating the basis of cognitive deficits in people who have survived SARS-COV-2 infection.

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20134635

ABSTRACT

How has the Covid-19 pandemic affected mental health? What are the most common positives and negatives? How do population variables mediate the impact on mood and behaviour? Who is most at risk of adverse consequences? Which pragmatic measures can help? We address these questions in a data-driven manner by applying multivariate, machine-learning and natural-language processing methods to a survey database collected from 376,987 members of the general public. We report that small average changes in mood from pre-to mid-pandemic obfuscate substantial consequences, both positive and negative, for people from particular sub-populations, vocations, circumstances and personality profiles. The coping strategies that people find helpful during the pandemic are correspondingly diverse yet predictable. We propose that by combining psychological, and demographic variables, it is possible to identify individuals who are at most risk of adverse consequences and to extract individually tailored advice from the collective lived experiences of the general population.

3.
Psychiatry Investigation ; : 1130-1134, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-719193

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Trichotillomania is a relatively common illness whose neurobiology is poorly understood. One treatment for adult trichotillomania, n-acetyl cysteine (NAC), has antioxidative properties, as well as effects on central glutamatergic transmission. Preclinical models suggest that excessive oxidative stress may be involved in its pathophysiology. METHODS: Adults with trichotillomania provided a blood sample for analysis of compounds that may be influenced by oxidative stress [glutathione, angiotensin II, ferritin, iron, glucose, insulin and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1), and hepcidin]. Participants were examined on symptom severity, disability, and impulsivity. The number of participants with out-of-reference range oxidative stress measures were compared against the null distribution. Correlations between oxidative stress markers and clinical measures were examined. RESULTS: Of 14 participants (mean age 31.2 years; 92.9% female), 35.7% (n=5) had total glutathione levels below the reference range (p= 0.041). Other oxidative stress measures did not have significant proportions outside the reference ranges. Lower levels of glutathione correlated significantly with higher motor impulsiveness (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale sub-score) (r=0.97, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: A third of patients with trichotillomania had low levels of glutathione, and lower levels of glutathione correlated significantly with higher motor impulsiveness. Because NAC is a precursor for cysteine, and cysteine is a rate limiting step for glutathione production, these results may shed light on the mechanisms through which NAC can have beneficial effects for impulsive symptoms. Confirmation of these results requires a suitable larger follow-up study, including an internal normative control group.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Angiotensin II , Cysteine , Ferritins , Follow-Up Studies , Glucose , Glutathione , Impulsive Behavior , Insulin , Iron , Neurobiology , Oxidative Stress , Reference Values , Trichotillomania
4.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-146964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Korean translation of Gambling Symptom Rating Scale (KG-SAS). METHODS: Using self-report sampling, we eventually included 231 subjects and analysed 70 subjects. These subjects were tested for KG-SAS and the Korean version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). RESULTS: In the reliability test, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .913 which provided the evidence for the internal consistency. Content validity was assessed with factor analysis and two factors were extracted. Compared with the original scale, both scales embody the same theoretical conceptualization. To assess the validity of the KG-SAS, correlation coefficient was calculated between the KG-SAS and the Korean version of BIS. We got the result that there was a correlation between the KG-SAS and the Korean version of BIS (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study support that the KG-SAS is a reliable and valid scale for evaluating pathological gambling symptom assessment. Based on the results, this study suggests that KG-SAS would be a promising measurement to treat and study pathological gambling.


Subject(s)
Gambling , Reproducibility of Results , Symptom Assessment , Weights and Measures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL