ABSTRACT
BackgroundMore than a year after recovering from COVID-19, a large proportion of individuals still report olfactory dysfunctions. However, olfactory dysfunction was common also before the COVID-19 pandemic. To establish the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction while controlling for existing cases, we tested individuals with established COVID-19 in the first wave of the pandemic using psychophysical testing of smell functions. MethodsParticipants were regularly tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies since the start of the pandemic. To assess normal rate of dysfunction in the population and skewed recruitment of individuals with prior olfactory dysfunction, SARS-CoV-2 IgG naive individuals were tested as a control group. ResultsOne and a half years after COVID-19, 37% of individuals who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated a clinical reduction in their sense of smell, compared to only 20% of the control group. Critically, 51% of COVID-19-recovered individuals reported parosmia symptoms, compared to only 5% in the control group. ConclusionsIn summary, a full 65% of individuals who recovered from COVID-19 experienced some form of olfactory dysfunction 18 months later. This means that the first wave of COVID-19 increased the prevalence of a clinical reduction in the sense of smell in the population with 17 percentage points and the prevalence of any form of olfactory dysfunction with a staggering 41 percentage points when compared to individuals not infected by the virus. Given the amount of time since the initial insult to the olfactory system, it is likely that these olfactory problems are permanent in a plurality of patients.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCOVID-19 has heterogeneous manifestations, though one of the most common symptoms is a sudden loss of smell (anosmia or hyposmia). We investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19. MethodsThis preregistered, cross-sectional study used a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0-100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n=4148) or negative (C19-; n=546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified singular and cumulative predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. ResultsBoth C19+ and C19-groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean{+/-}SD, C19+: -82.5{+/-}27.2 points; C19-: -59.8{+/-}37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both single and cumulative feature models (ROC AUC=0.72), with additional features providing negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms, such as fever or cough. Olfactory recovery within 40 days was reported for [~]50% of participants and was best predicted by time since illness onset. ConclusionsAs smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19, we developed the ODoR-19 tool, a 0-10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss. Numeric ratings [≤]2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4
ABSTRACT
Recent anecdotal and scientific reports have provided evidence of a link between COVID-19 and chemosensory impairments such as anosmia. However, these reports have downplayed or failed to distinguish potential effects on taste, ignored chemesthesis, generally lacked quantitative measurements, were mostly restricted to data from single countries. Here, we report the development, implementation and initial results of a multi-lingual, international questionnaire to assess self-reported quantity and quality of perception in three distinct chemosensory modalities (smell, taste, and chemesthesis) before and during COVID-19. In the first 11 days after questionnaire launch, 4039 participants (2913 women, 1118 men, 8 other, ages 19-79) reported a COVID-19 diagnosis either via laboratory tests or clinical assessment. Importantly, smell, taste and chemesthetic function were each significantly reduced compared to their status before the disease. Difference scores (maximum possible change {+/-}100) revealed a mean reduction of smell (-79.7 {+/-} 28.7, mean {+/-} SD), taste (-69.0 {+/-} 32.6), and chemesthetic (-37.3 {+/-} 36.2) function during COVID-19. Qualitative changes in olfactory ability (parosmia and phantosmia) were relatively rare and correlated with smell loss. Importantly, perceived nasal obstruction did not account for smell loss. Furthermore, chemosensory impairments were similar between participants in the laboratory test and clinical assessment groups. These results show that COVID-19-associated chemosensory impairment is not limited to smell, but also affects taste and chemesthesis. The multimodal impact of COVID-19 and lack of perceived nasal obstruction suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection may disrupt sensory-neural mechanisms.
