Patients' preferences for distributing limited government-funded IVF cycles.

OBJECTIVE: On December 21, 2015, Ontario began funding one cycle of IVF for each resident with a uterus under the age of 43, but with a program cap that is insufficient to meet the annual demand. Our objective was to determine how fertility patients believe that the limited number of funded IVF cycles should be distributed. METHODS: A survey was distributed to patients attending a university affiliated hospital-based fertility clinic in downtown Toronto, including its associated peripheral satellite clinics. RESULTS: From August 2016 to March 2017, 271 patients responded to the survey, of whom 90.3% were in favour of public funding for IVF. The majority of participants favoured allocating IVF cycles to maximize patients' access to IVF in Ontario rather than targeting funded IVF cycles so as to maximize live births (62.7% vs. 32.8%). Most participants wanted all clinics to adopt the same approach for distributing funded IVF cycles compared to the current system in which each clinic chooses its own criteria for allocation (84.5% vs. 8.5%). Participants favoured distributing IVF by way of a scoring system that took individual patient factors into account. However, the factors that each respondent considered important varied materially. CONCLUSION: Patients overwhelmingly supported public funding for IVF, desired a consistent policy for distribution of limited funded IVF cycles at all clinics, and preferred a method that took individual patient factors into consideration when determining patient priority for funded IVF but there were heterogenous opinions on which factors should be included.

Reducing day 3 baseline monitoring bloodwork and ultrasound for patients undergoing timed intercourse and intrauterine insemination treatment cycles.

BACKGROUND: In the current context of a global pandemic it is imperative for fertility clinics to consider the necessity of individual tests and eliminate those that have limited utility and may impose unnecessary risk of exposure. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a multi-modal quality improvement (QI) strategy to promote resource stewardship by reducing routine day 3 (d3) bloodwork and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) and timed intercourse (IC) treatment cycles. METHODS: After literature review, clinic stakeholders at an academic fertility centre met to discuss d3 testing utility and factors contributing to d3 bloodwork/TVUS in IC/IUI treatment cycles. Consensus was reached that it was unnecessary in patients taking oral/no medications. The primary intervention changed the default setting on the electronic order set to exclude d3 testing for IC/IUI cycles with oral/no medications. Exceptions required active test selection. Protocols were updated and education sessions were held. The main outcome measure was the proportion of cycles receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS during the 8-week post-intervention period compared with the 8-week pre-intervention period. Balancing measures included provider satisfaction, pregnancy rates, and incidence of cycle cancellation. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the proportion of cycles receiving d3 TVUS (57.2% vs 20.8%, p < 0.001) and ≥ 1 blood test (58.6% vs 22.8%, p < 0.001) was observed post-intervention. There was no significant difference in cycle cancellation or pregnancy rates pre- and post-intervention (p = 0.86). Treatment with medications, cyst history, prescribing physician, and treatment centre were associated with receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS. 74% of providers were satisfied with the intervention. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in IC/IUI treatment cycles that received d3 bloodwork/TVUS was achieved without measured negative treatment impacts. During a pandemic, eliminating routine d3 bloodwork/TVUS represents a safe way to reduce monitoring appointments and exposure.

Fertility patients' use and perceptions of online fertility educational material.

BACKGROUND: Online educational information is highly sought out by patients with infertility. This study aims to assess patient-reported usage and helpfulness of fertility educational material on a clinic website and social media accounts. METHODS: Educational material was created on common fertility topics in text and video format and posted on the clinic website and social media accounts. At the first consultation for infertility, patients were provided with a postcard directing them to material online. At the first follow-up appointment, patients were invited to fill out a survey assessing whether patients viewed the online educational material and if they found the information helpful. RESULTS: 98.4% (251/255) of patients completed the survey, of which 42.6% (106/249) looked at the online material. Of those who viewed the online information, 99.1% (115/116) found the information helpful or somewhat helpful and 67.6% (73/108) found reading the material online better prepared them for making fertility decisions at their doctor's appointment. CONCLUSION: Patients found online fertility information on the clinic website and social media accounts useful for making fertility treatment decisions. Providing online educational material has the potential to improve patient care by empowering patients with the knowledge to make more informed treatment decisions, and improving the quality of the time spent with the physician.

The Impact of the Ontario Fertility Program on Duplicate Fertility Consultations.

Objectives: The Ontario Fertility Program (OFP) funds 5,000 annual in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. We hypothesized that after introduction of the OFP, there would be an increase in duplicate infertility consultations by patients attempting to increase chances at obtaining publicly funded IVF through enlisting at multiple fertility clinics. Methods: This retrospective observational study included women eligible for healthcare services in Ontario from 2014 to 2016 and compared infertility consultations pre- and post-initiation of the OFP. Results: Post-OFP, the average number of consultations per patient and the proportion of patients with more than one consult increased (1.04 vs. 1.05, p = 0.015 and 3.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.027, respectively). Total consultations for infertility increased from 24,565 to 27,714 post-OFP. The OFP had the largest impact in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Conclusion: The OFP resulted in a statistically significant increase in duplicate consultations, although unlikely to be of clinical relevance. The disproportionate impact seen in the GTA highlights the inequitable access to fertility care in Ontario.

Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Endometrial Shedding With Medroxyprogesterone Acetate With Random Start of Clomiphene Citrate for Ovulation Induction in Oligo-ovulatory and Anovulatory Women.

OBJECTIVE: A recent retrospective study demonstrated that anovulatory infertile women who did not have a progestogen-induced withdrawal bleed before treatment with clomiphene citrate (CC) had higher pregnancy rates than women who had a withdrawal bleed and those who had spontaneous menstrual bleeding. We sought to assess endometrial thickness at the time of ovulation in oligo-ovulatory and anovulatory women who took CC with or without a preceding progestogen-induced withdrawal bleed. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized trial in which women with infertility and oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea were randomly assigned to take either CC after a withdrawal bleed induced by medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg daily for 10 days or to take CC without such a bleed. Study participants underwent cycle monitoring with ultrasound assessment of endometrial thickness at the time of LH surge or a human chorionic gonadotropin trigger, followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Women who had not ovulated by cycle day 21 took an increased dose of CC, with or without an MPA-induced withdrawal bleed, to a maximum of three cycles. Participants and nurses were asked to complete a questionnaire about the study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness on the day of LH surge or human chorionic gonadotropin trigger between women who had a progestogen-induced withdrawal bleed and those who did not (P = 0.65). On average, the time to ovulation was 15 days longer in women who took MPA than in women who did not, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Satisfaction with the study was reported as high by both patients and nurses. CONCLUSION: In anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory women treated with CC, we found no significant difference in endometrial thickness whether or not the use of CC was preceded by a withdrawal bleed induced by MPA.

PGD for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion using aCGH.

Intrachromosomal insertions are rare and difficult to diagnose. However, making the correct diagnosis is critical for genetic risk assessment, and prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis outcomes. We present a case of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) following trophectoderm biopsy of embryos created after in vitro fertilization for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion on chromosome 1 [46,XX, ins(1)(q44q23q32.1)]. The PGD analysis of 6 blastocysts demonstrated 67% unbalanced embryos. No pregnancy was achieved after the transfer of 2 euploid embryos. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PGD using aCGH following trophectoderm biopsy for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion.

Bon voyage: an update on safe travel in pregnancy.

Travel in pregnancy is common, particularly as international travel for work and leisure has become more commonplace. Few women are fully aware of the potential risks of travelling while pregnant, particularly the risk of delivering abroad. We describe here the medical risks and the many social, financial, and logistical considerations for travelling during pregnancy. Pertinent considerations include the risks of developing medical complications abroad, immunization considerations, access to obstetrical care in developing countries, travel medical insurance, and airline regulations.

Les femmes enceintes sont fréquemment appelées à se déplacer, particulièrement depuis que les déplacements internationaux pour des raisons professionnelles et ludiques sont devenus plus courants. Peu de femmes connaissent vraiment les risques potentiels qui sont associés aux déplacements pendant la grossesse (et particulièrement le risque d'accoucher à l'étranger). Nous décrivons ici les risques médicaux et les nombreux facteurs sociaux, financiers et logistiques à prendre en considération pour ce qui est des déplacements pendant la grossesse. Parmi les facteurs pertinents à prendre en considération, on trouve le risque d'en venir à connaître des complications médicales à l'étranger, les immunisations requises, l'accès aux soins obstétricaux au sein des pays en développement, la couverture médicale assurée par l'assurance voyage et les règlements des transporteurs aériens.

Fertility treatment decision-making: the effect of insurance coverage for fertility medications.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the perceived impact of insurance coverage for fertility medications on patients' fertility treatment decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving a patient survey and chart review of women at a Canadian university-affiliated fertility centre. The primary outcome was to determine whether women with self-reported insurance coverage for fertility medications perceived the impact of insurance coverage for fertility medications differently from women without coverage or those who do not know their extent of coverage. Secondary outcomes included differences between groups in the perceived impact of insurance coverage for fertility medications on specific treatment decisions and the type of fertility treatments undergone by patients. Data collected from the survey and chart review were analyzed using chi-square tests. RESULTS: More women without insurance ranked insurance coverage as having a large impact on the decision to undergo fertility treatment than women in the other groups, although this was not statistically significant. Significantly more women without insurance coverage ranked all specific treatment decisions except for the number of IVF cycles as having a large impact than did women in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Women perceive that having insurance coverage for fertility medications affects the decision to undergo fertility treatment. Women without insurance are more likely to perceive that insurance coverage affects specific fertility treatment decisions than women with insurance or women who do not know whether they have insurance.