Individual- and community-level social determinants of health are associated with cognition in older adults with focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is associated with significant health disparities, including access to specialized care and adverse outcomes that have been associated with several social determinants of health (SDOH). We sought to examine the relationship between individual- and community-level SDOH and cognitive outcomes in older adults with epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected clinical, SDOH, and neuropsychological data in 57 older adults with epilepsy. Individual-level SDOH included patient factors (quality of education, income, insurance, marital status) and early-life environmental factors (parental education and occupation, childhood employment). Neighborhood deprivation was measured with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Stepwise regressions were conducted to examine the independent contribution of individual-level SDOH to cognitive performance, and Spearman rho correlations were conducted to examine the relationship between ADI and cognitive performance. The SDOH profiles of patients who met the criteria for cognitive impairment were examined. RESULTS: After controlling for clinical variables, patient factors (public health insurance, poorer quality of education) and early-life environmental factors (lower mother's education, lower father's and mother's occupational complexity, history of childhood employment) were significant predictors of lower performance on measures of global cognition, verbal learning and memory, processing speed, and executive function. Higher ADI values (greater disadvantage) were associated with lower scores on global cognitive measures, verbal learning and memory, and executive function. Patients who met criteria for cognitive impairment had, on average, a greater number of adverse SDOH, including lower household incomes and father's education, and higher ADI values compared to those who were cognitively intact. CONCLUSION: We provide new evidence of the role of individual- and community-level SDOH on cognitive outcomes in older adults with epilepsy. This emerging literature highlights the need to examine SDOH beyond epilepsy-related clinical factors. These data could inform the development of interventions focused on increasing access to epilepsy care, education, and resources and promoting brain and cognitive health within the most at-risk communities.

Validity of the MoCA as a cognitive screening tool in epilepsy: Are there implications for global care and research?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a widely available cognitive screener, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), to detect cognitive impairment in older patients (age ≥ 55) with epilepsy residing in the US, using the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE) as the gold standard. METHODS: Fifty older adults with focal epilepsy completed the MoCA and neuropsychological measures of memory, language, executive function, and processing speed/attention. The IC-CoDE taxonomy divided participants into IC-CoDE Impaired and Intact groups. Sensitivity and specificity across several MoCA cutoffs were examined. Spearman correlations examined relationships between the MoCA total score and clinical and demographic variables and MoCA domain scores and individual neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: IC-CoDE impaired patients demonstrated significantly lower scores on the MoCA total, visuospatial/executive, naming, language, delayed recall, and orientation domain scores (Cohen's d range: 0.336-2.77). The recommended MoCA cutoff score < 26 had an overall accuracy of 72%, 88.2% sensitivity, and 63.6% specificity. A MoCA cutoff score < 24 yielded optimal sensitivity (70.6%) and specificity (78.8%), with overall accuracy of 76%. Higher MoCA total scores were associated with greater years of education (p = 0.016) and fewer antiseizure medications (p = 0.049). The MoCA memory domain was associated with several standardized measures of memory, MoCA language domain with category fluency, and MoCA abstraction domain with letter fluency. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides initial validation of the MoCA as a useful screening tool for older adults with epilepsy that can be used to identify patients who may benefit from comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Further, we demonstrate that a lower cutoff (i.e., <24) better captures cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy than the generally recommended cutoff and provides evidence for construct overlap between MoCA domains and standard neuropsychological tests. Critically, similar efforts in other regions of the world are needed. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) can be a helpful tool to screen for cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy. We recommend that adults 55 or older with epilepsy who score less than 24 on the MoCA are referred to a neuropsychologist for a comprehensive evaluation to assess any changes in cognitive abilities and mood.

Long-term characterization of cognitive phenotypes in children with seizures over 36 months.

RATIONALE: Children with new-onset epilepsies often exhibit co-morbidities including cognitive dysfunction, which adversely affects academic performance. Application of unsupervised machine learning techniques has demonstrated the presence of discrete cognitive phenotypes at or near the time of diagnosis, but there is limited knowledge of their longitudinal trajectories. Here we investigate longitudinally the presence and progression of cognitive phenotypes and academic status in youth with new-onset seizures as sibling controls. METHODS: 282 subjects (6-16 years) were recruited within 6 weeks of their first recognized seizure along with 167 unaffected siblings. Each child underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment at baseline, 18 and 36 months later. Factor analysis of the neuropsychological tests revealed four underlying domains - language, processing speed, executive function, and verbal memory. Latent trajectory analysis of the mean factor scores over 36 months identified clusters with prototypical cognitive trajectories. RESULTS: Three unique phenotypic groups with distinct cognitive trajectories over the 36-month period were identified: Resilient, Average, and Impaired phenotypes. The Resilient phenotype exhibited the highest neuropsychological factor scores and academic performance that were all similar to controls; while the Impaired phenotype showed the polar opposite with the worst performances across all test metrics. These findings remained significant and stable over 36 months. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age of onset, EEG, neurological examination, and sociodemographic disadvantage were associated with phenotype classification. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the presence of diverse latent cognitive trajectory phenotypes over 36 months in youth with new-onset seizures that are associated with a stable neuropsychological and academic performance longitudinally.

Vitamin B6 and vitamin D deficiency co-occurrence in geriatric memory patients.

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin B6 and D levels are not assessed routinely in geriatric memory patients. This study examined vitamin levels to determine the potential effects on cognition. METHODS: A chart review was conducted of 203 consecutive patients over a 12-month period. Levels of vitamins B1, B6, B12, and D were obtained on the day of clinic to identify deficiencies. A mental status exam (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE]) was also performed. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients had one or more vitamin levels obtained on the day of clinical evaluation. Vitamin B6 deficiency was the most common (37.5%), followed by vitamin D deficiency (36.8%). A chi-square test revealed significant co-occurrence of deficiency of vitamins B6 and D (p < 0.001). Vitamin B6 and D deficiencies were associated with lower MMSE scores (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Vitamin B6 and D deficiencies are common in geriatric patients. The coexistence of these vitamin deficiencies has a significant association with cognitive performance, indicating the clinical importance of monitoring and supplementation.

Neighborhood disadvantage and intellectual development in youth with epilepsy.

RATIONALE: Recent cross-sectional investigations have demonstrated an adverse impact of socioeconomic disadvantage on cognition and behavior in youth and adults with epilepsy. The goal of this study is to investigate the impact of disadvantage on prospective intellectual development in youth with epilepsy. METHOD: Participants were youth, aged 8-18 years, with recent onset epilepsy (n = 182) and healthy first-degree cousin controls (n = 106). The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) was administered at baseline and 2 years later. The Neighborhood Atlas identified each family's Area Deprivation Index via state deciles and national percentiles. WASI data were analyzed by mixed group by time ANOVAs followed by regression analysis to identify other baseline predictors of time 2 outcomes. RESULTS: Youth with epilepsy demonstrated significant interactions between group and time for both verbal (F = 4.02, df = 1,215, p =.05) and nonverbal (F = 4.57, df = 1,215, p =.04) reasoning, demonstrating that disadvantage was associated with slower cognitive development compared to advantaged youth with epilepsy. Similar interactions were not observed for controls. CONCLUSIONS: In youth with new and recent onset epilepsies, neighborhood-level disadvantage is associated with a negative impact on the development of verbal and nonverbal reasoning skills.

The Impact of Sociodemographic Disadvantage on Cognitive Outcomes in Children With Newly Diagnosed Seizures and Their Unaffected Siblings Over 36 Months.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that children with newly diagnosed epilepsy have comorbidities including cognitive challenges. Research investigating comorbidities has focused on clinical epilepsy characteristics and neurobiological/genetic correlates. The role that sociodemographic disadvantage (SD) may play has received less attention. We investigated the role of SD in cognitive status in youth with newly diagnosed epilepsy over a follow-up of 36 months to determine the degree, extent, and duration of the role of disadvantage. METHODS: A total of 289 children (six to 16 years) within six weeks of their first seizure along with 167 siblings underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments (intelligence, language, memory, executive function, processing speed, and academic achievement) at baseline, 18 months later, and at 36 months from baseline. Baseline demographic information (race, caregivers education, household income, and parental marital status), clinical epilepsy characteristics (e.g., age of onset), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalographic (EEG) information was collected. RESULTS: An SD index was computed for each family and categorized into four groups by level of disadvantage. In children and siblings, the least disadvantaged group exhibited the highest Full-Scale IQ, neuropsychological factor scores, and academic performances, whereas the most disadvantaged showed the polar opposite with the worst performances across all tests. Findings remained stable and significant over 36 months. Linear regression analyses indicated that disadvantage was a more constant and stable predictor of cognitive and academic performance over time compared with clinical epilepsy characteristics and MRI/EEG abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the strong association between SD and cognitive/academic performance in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy and their siblings is significant and predictive of three-year cognitive outcomes.

Impact of sociodemographic disadvantage on neurobehavioral outcomes in children with newly diagnosed seizures and their unaffected siblings over 36 months.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the short-term and longer term impact of sociodemographic disadvantage on the emotional-behavioral status of youths with new onset epilepsy and their unaffected siblings at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent 3 years. METHODS: Three hundred twelve youths with newly diagnosed epilepsies and 223 unaffected siblings, aged 6-16 years, were independently assessed regarding their emotional and behavioral status by their parents and teachers at baseline, and at 18 at 36 months later; youths with seizures also completed self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and hostility at those three time points. A sociodemographic disadvantage score was computed for each family (children with newly diagnosed seizures and their siblings), and families were separated into four categories from most disadvantaged to least disadvantaged. RESULTS: In both children and siblings, the least disadvantaged group exhibited the lowest level of neurobehavioral problems, whereas the most disadvantaged group showed a higher level of neurobehavioral problems across all the same behavior metrics. Findings remained stable and significant across all informants (parent, teacher, child) and across all time periods (throughout the 3-year period). Furthermore, both corrected and uncorrected linear regression analyses indicated that disadvantage was a more constant and stable predictor of behavioral and emotional problems over time compared to clinical seizure characteristics and abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalographic testing. SIGNIFICANCE: Sociodemographic disadvantage bears a strong relationship to youths with emotional and behavioral problems both at the time of diagnosis as well as prospectively. The relationship is robust and reflected in reports from multiple informants (parent, teacher, child self-report), evident in siblings as well, and possibly more explanatory than traditional clinical seizure variables. Future studies will be needed to determine whether this disadvantage factor is modifiable with early intervention.

Disadvantage and neurocognitive comorbidities in childhood idiopathic epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to characterize the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and cognitive function as well as clinical, sociodemographic, and family factors in children with new onset idiopathic epilepsy and healthy controls. METHODS: Research participants were 288 children aged 8-18 years with recent onset epilepsy (CWE; n = 182; mean age = 12.2 ± 3.2 years), healthy first-degree cousin controls (HC; n = 106; mean age = 12.5 ± 3.0), and one biological or adopted parent per child (n = 279). All participants were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery (reasoning, language, memory, executive function, motor function, and academic achievement). Family residential addresses were entered into the Neighborhood Atlas to determine each family's Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a metric used to quantify income, education, employment, and housing quality. A combination of parametric and nonparametric (χ2 ) tests examined the effect of ADI by group (epilepsy and controls) across cognitive, academic, clinical, and family factors. RESULTS: Disadvantage (ADI) was equally distributed between groups (p = .63). For CWE, high disadvantage was associated with lower overall intellectual quotient (IQ; p = .04), visual naming/expressive language (p = .03), phonemic (letter) fluency (p < .01), passive inattention (omission errors; p = .03), delayed verbal recall (p = .04), and dominant fine motor dexterity and speed (p < .01). Cognitive status of the HC group did not differ by level of disadvantage (p = .40). CWE exhibited greater academic difficulties in comparison to HC (p < .001), which were exacerbated by disadvantage in CWE (p = .02) but not HC (p < .05). High disadvantage was associated with a threefold risk for academic challenges prior to epilepsy onset (odds ratio = 3.31, p = .024). SIGNIFICANCE: Socioeconomic hardship (increased neighborhood disadvantage) exerts a significant adverse impact on the cognitive and academic status of youth with new and recent onset epilepsies, an impact that needs to be incorporated into etiological models of the neurobehavioral comorbidities of epilepsy.

Treatment of Comorbid Anxiety and Epilepsy.

Objective: Anxiety is among the most common psychiatric illnesses, and it commonly co-occurs with epilepsy. This review of the existing literature on anxiety comorbid with epilepsy aims to generate new insights into strategies for assessment and treatment. Methods: The authors conducted a narrative literature review to select key publications that help clarify the phenomenology and management of comorbid anxiety and epilepsy. Results: Anxiety symptoms may be relevant even if the criteria for a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder are not met. Associating specific seizure types or seizure localization with anxiety symptoms remains difficult; however, the amygdala is a brain region commonly associated with seizure foci and panic or fear sensations. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis may also be relevant for anxiety symptoms, particularly for the selection of treatments. Nonpharmacological treatment is appropriate for anxiety comorbid with epilepsy, particularly because relaxation techniques may reduce hypersympathetic states, which improve symptoms. Medication options include antidepressants and anticonvulsants that may have efficacy for anxiety symptoms. Benzodiazepines are a good choice to address this comorbid condition, although side effects may limit utility. Conclusions: Ultimately, there are numerous treatment options, and although there is a limited evidence base, quality of life may be improved with appropriate treatment for individuals experiencing comorbid anxiety and epilepsy.

Characterizing Sleep Phenotypes in Children With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Children with epilepsy frequently have sleep, behavior, and cognitive problems at the time of or before the epilepsy diagnosis. The primary goal of this study was to determine if specific sleep disturbance phenotypes exist in a large cohort of children with new-onset epilepsy and if these phenotypes are associated with specific cognitive and behavioral signatures. METHODS: A total of354 children with new-onset epilepsy, aged six to 16 years, were recruited within six weeks of initial seizure onset. Each child underwent evaluation of their sleep along with self, parent, and teacher ratings of emotional-behavioral status. Two-step clustering using sleep disturbance (Sleep Behavior Questionnaire), naps, and sleep latency was employed to determine phenotype clusters. RESULTS: Analysis showed three distinct sleep disturbance phenotypes-minimal sleep disturbance, moderate sleep disturbance, and severe sleep disturbance phenotypes. Children who fell into the minimal sleep disturbance phenotype had an older age of onset with the best cognitive performance compared with the other phenotypes and the lowest levels of emotional-behavioral problems. In contrast, children who fell into the severe sleep disturbance phenotype had the youngest age of onset of epilepsy with poor cognitive performance and highest levels of emotional-behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that there are indeed specific sleep disturbance phenotypes that are apparent in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy and are associated with specific comorbidities. Future research should determine if these phenotypic groups persist over time and are predictive of long-term difficulties, as these subgroups may benefit from targeted therapy and intervention.

The Relationship Between Sleep, Cognition and Behavior in Children With Newly-Diagnosed Epilepsy Over 36 Months.

Introduction: There is substantial evidence that children with epilepsy experience more sleep, behavior and cognitive challenges than children without epilepsy. However, the literature is limited in describing the relationship between sleep, epilepsy, cognition and behavioral challenges and the interactions amongst these factors over time. This study aims to understand the nature and strength of the relationship between sleep, cognition, mood and behavior in children with new-onset epilepsy as assessed by multiple informants at multiple time periods using multiple different dependent measures. Methods: 332 participants (6-16years) were recruited within 6 weeks of their first recognized seizure. The comparison group was comprised of 266 healthy siblings. Participants underwent sleep evaluation by a parent using the Sleep Behavioral Questionnaire (SBQ), cognitive evaluation using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery, a behavioral evaluation using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL from parents and TRF from teachers) and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). These evaluations were completed at baseline (B), at 18 months, and at 36 months. Results: Compared to siblings, children with new-onset epilepsy had more sleep disturbance (SBQ), higher rates of behavioral problems (CBCL and TRF), lower cognitive testing scores, and higher rates of depression; which persisted over the 36-month study. Sleep significantly correlated with behavioral problems, cognitive scores and depression. When divided into categories based of sleep disturbance scores, 39.7% of children with epilepsy experienced "Persistently Abnormal Sleep", while 14.8% experienced "Persistently Normal Sleep". Children with persistently abnormal sleep experienced the highest rates of behavioral problems, depression and cognitive impairment compared to those with persistently normal sleep, regardless of epilepsy syndrome. Younger age of seizure onset, younger age at testing, and lower grade level at baseline were associated with persistently abnormal sleep. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the nature, strength, reliability, stability and persistence of the relationship between sleep, cognition, and behavioral problems over time in a large cohort of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, as assessed by multiple informants at different timepoints. The results of this study indicate that children with epilepsy are at a high risk of significant persisting neurobehavioral multimorbidity. Therefore, early screening for these challenges may be essential for optimizing quality of life long-term.

The impact of processing speed on cognition in temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the impact of slowed processing speed on the efficiency of broader cognitive function in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: Participants included 100 patients with TLE and 89 healthy controls (mean ages 36.8 and 33.6, respectively) administered a neuropsychological battery consisting of 15 cognitive metrics. Confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM) latent variable modeling demonstrated a cognitive structure representing the domains of verbal intelligence, immediate memory, delayed memory, executive function, working memory, and processing speed. Furthermore, the latent variable measurement model determined the direct and indirect relationships of verbal intelligence and processing speed with immediate memory, delayed memory, executive function, and working memory. RESULTS: Following SEM of hypothesized structural models, the results demonstrated that, among controls, intelligence had a direct and unmediated (by processing speed) relationship with all identified cognitive domains. In contrast, among participants with TLE, processing speed mediated the relationship between verbal intelligence and performance across all cognitive domains. CONCLUSION: Slowing of cognitive/psychomotor processing speed appears to play a critical mediating role in the broader cognitive status of participants with TLE and may serve as a target through which to attempt to exert a broad positive impact on neuropsychological status.

Behavioral phenotypes of temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To identity phenotypes of self-reported symptoms of psychopathology and their correlates in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHOD: 96 patients with TLE and 82 controls were administered the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) to characterize emotional-behavioral status. The nine symptom scales of the SCL-90-R were analyzed by unsupervised machine learning techniques to identify latent TLE groups. Identified clusters were contrasted to controls to characterize their association with sociodemographic, clinical epilepsy, neuropsychological, psychiatric, and neuroimaging factors. RESULTS: TLE patients as a group exhibited significantly higher (abnormal) scores across all SCL-90-R scales compared to controls. However, cluster analysis identified three latent groups: (1) unimpaired with no scale elevations compared to controls (Cluster 1, 42% of TLE patients), (2) mild-to-moderate symptomatology characterized by significant elevations across several SCL-90-R scales compared to controls (Cluster 2, 35% of TLE patients), and (3) marked symptomatology with significant elevations across all scales compared to controls and the other TLE phenotype groups (Cluster 3, 23% of TLE patients). There were significant associations between cluster membership and demographic (education), clinical epilepsy (perceived seizure severity, bitemporal lobe seizure onset), and neuropsychological status (intelligence, memory, executive function), but with minimal structural neuroimaging correlates. Concurrent validity of the behavioral phenotype grouping was demonstrated through association with psychiatric (current and lifetime-to-date DSM IV Axis 1 disorders and current treatment) and quality-of-life variables. SIGNIFICANCE: Symptoms of psychopathology in patients with TLE are characterized by a series of discrete phenotypes with accompanying sociodemographic, cognitive, and clinical correlates. Similar to cognition in TLE, machine learning approaches suggest a developing taxonomy of the comorbidities of epilepsy.

Behavioral phenotypes of childhood idiopathic epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presence and nature of discrete behavioral phenotypes and their correlates in a cohort of youth with new and recent onset focal and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: The parents of 290 youth (age = 8-18 years) with epilepsy (n = 183) and typically developing participants (n = 107) completed the Child Behavior Checklist for children aged 6-18 from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment. The eight behavior problem scales were subjected to hierarchical clustering analytics to identify behavioral subgroups. To characterize the external validity and co-occurring comorbidities of the identified subgroups, we examined demographic features (age, gender, handedness), cognition (language, perception, attention, executive function, speed), academic problems (present/absent), clinical epilepsy characteristics (epilepsy syndrome, medications), familial factors (parental intelligence quotient, education, employment), neuroimaging features (cortical thickness), parent-observed day-to-day executive function, and number of lifetime-to-date Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses. RESULTS: Hierarchical clustering identified three behavioral phenotypes, which included no behavioral complications (Cluster 1, 67% of epilepsy cohort [n = 122]), nonexternalizing problems (Cluster 2, 11% of cohort [n = 21]), and combined internalizing and externalizing problems (Cluster 3, 22% of cohort [n = 40]). These behavioral phenotypes were characterized by orderly differences in personal characteristics, neuropsychological status, history of academic problems, parental status, cortical thickness, daily executive function, and number of lifetime-to-date DSM-IV diagnoses. Cluster 1 was most similar to controls across most metrics, whereas Cluster 3 was the most abnormal compared to controls. Epilepsy syndrome was not a predictor of cluster membership. SIGNIFICANCE: Youth with new and recent onset epilepsy fall into three distinct behavioral phenotypes associated with a variety of co-occurring features and comorbidities. This approach identifies important phenotypes of behavior problem presentations and their accompanying factors that serve to advance clinical and theoretical understanding of the behavioral complications of children with epilepsy and the complex conditions with which they co-occur.

Cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy utilizing data- and clinically driven approaches: Moving toward a new taxonomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and test their reproducibility in a large, multi-site cohort of patients using both data-driven and clinically driven approaches. METHOD: Four-hundred seven patients with TLE who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at one of four epilepsy centers were included. Scores on tests of verbal memory, naming, fluency, executive function, and psychomotor speed were converted into z-scores based on 151 healthy controls (HCs). For the data-driven method, cluster analysis (k-means) was used to determine the optimal number of clusters. For the clinically driven method, impairment was defined as >1.5 standard deviations below the mean of the HC, and patients were classified into groups based on the pattern of impairment. RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed a three-cluster solution characterized by (a) generalized impairment (29%), (b) language and memory impairment (28%), and (c) no impairment (43%). Based on the clinical criteria, the same broad categories were identified, but with a different distribution: (a) generalized impairment (37%), (b) language and memory impairment (30%), and (c) no impairment (33%). There was a 82.6% concordance rate with good agreement (κ = .716) between the methods. Forty-eight patients classified as having a normal profile based on cluster analysis were classified as having generalized impairment (n = 16) or an isolated language/memory impairment (n = 32) based on the clinical criteria. Patients with generalized impairment had a longer disease duration and patients with no impairment had more years of education. However, patients demonstrating the classic TLE profile (ie, language and memory impairment) were not more likely to have an earlier age at onset or mesial temporal sclerosis. SIGNIFICANCE: We validate previous findings from single-site studies that have identified three unique cognitive phenotypes in TLE and offer a means of translating the patterns into a clinical diagnostic criteria, representing a novel taxonomy of neuropsychological status in TLE.

Psychosocial and functional outcomes in young adults with childhood-onset epilepsy: a 10-year follow-up.

AIM: To compare long-term psychosocial and functional outcomes of young adults with uncomplicated childhood-onset epilepsy (COE) to population norm controls utilizing a controlled prospective cohort study. METHOD: Psychosocial and functional outcomes were assessed at 10-year follow-up. Fifty-three young adults (27 males, 26 females) with COE (n=21 remission; 18y 1mo-30y 9mo; mean age 23y 4mo [SD 3y 4mo]; mean age of epilepsy onset 12y [SD 3y 2mo]) were compared to 55 (23 males, 32 females) first-degree cousin controls (18y 5mo-29y 8mo; mean age 23y 6mo [SD 3y]). Seizure remission status and baseline comorbidities (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and academic problems) were examined as possible risk factors for significant differences in functional outcomes. RESULTS: Poorer functional outcomes, indicated by patient rated cognition and overall disability, were evident among young adults with epilepsy compared to controls (all p<0.05). These difficulties were due to baseline comorbid ADHD and academic problems. Remission status was not related to measured cognition and overall disability. INTERPRETATION: Psychosocial outcomes of young adults with COE were similar to controls. In contrast, functional outcomes were worse in epilepsy across cognition and overall disability. Baseline comorbid ADHD and academic problems were identified as risk factors at 10-year follow-up suggesting that these early recognized comorbidities at or near diagnosis have long-term impacts. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Young adults with childhood-onset epilepsy (COE) and controls have similar psychosocial outcomes 10 years after diagnosis. Young adults with COE report greater limitations in cognition and overall disability than controls. Baseline presence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and academic problems significantly affect cognitive and overall disability scores.

Epilepsy Benchmarks Area IV: Limit or Prevent Adverse Consequence of Seizures and Their Treatment Across the Life Span.

Epilepsy represents a complex spectrum disorder, with patients sharing seizures as a common symptom and manifesting a broad array of additional clinical phenotypes. To understand this disorder and treat individuals who live with epilepsy, it is important not only to identify pathogenic mechanisms underlying epilepsy but also to understand their relationships with other health-related factors. Benchmarks Area IV focuses on the impact of seizures and their treatment on quality of life, development, cognitive function, and other aspects and comorbidities that often affect individuals with epilepsy. Included in this review is a discussion on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and other causes of mortality, a major area of research focus with still many unanswered questions. We also draw attention to special populations, such as individuals with nonepileptic seizures and pregnant women and their offspring. In this study, we review the progress made in these areas since the 2016 review of the Benchmarks Area IV and discuss challenges and opportunities for future study.

The Impact of Risk and Resistance Factors on Quality of Life in Caregivers of Individuals with Dementia.

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigates the effect of caregiver and care recipient risk and resistance factors on caregiver quality of life (QOL). Risk factors are those characteristics that contribute to psychosocial maladjustment of the caregiver and reduce QOL, while resistance factors promote caregiver adjustment and improve QOL. METHODS: One-hundred and three caregiver/care recipient dyads were recruited from a memory assessment clinic in Midwestern United States. Caregivers completed questionnaires estimating perceived social support, spirituality, social problem-solving, and care recipient functional dependence. Care recipients' results from the Mini-Mental State Examination and Animal Naming task were also collected. RESULTS: In the final model, caregiver age, relationship type, social problem-solving, perceived social support, and care recipient functional dependence each accounted for a significant portion of variance in caregiver QOL. The final model accounted for 46.1% of the variance in caregiver QOL. CONCLUSION: Caregiver age, relationship type, social problem-solving, perceived social support, and care recipient functional dependence are important contributors to caregiver QOL. Further research is needed to specify which caregiver and care recipient characteristics are most important to caregiver QOL. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should assess caregiver problem-solving skills, social support, and care recipient functional dependence, as these may provide important information about caregiver QOL. Study results also suggest that caregiving has more of a negative impact on caregiver QOL for midlife adult caregivers compared to older adult caregivers, and appears to have a greater negative effect on spouses than on children.