Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 74, 2024 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238654

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a guideline-recommended first-line intervention for people with knee osteoarthritis. Physical activity levels, and its potential correlates, is underexplored in Asian populations with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Participants enrolled in a longitudinal study in Singapore self-reported physical activity (UCLA activity score), function (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-12]), kinesiophobia (Brief fear of movement [BFOM]), self-efficacy (ASES-8), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L). One-Way ANOVA was used to test the difference in outcomes between UCLA categories, while ordinal logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors to physical activity level. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of all enrolled participants (n = 311/425) reported either inactivity or low physical activity (median 4, IQR 3-5). Significant, weak, positive correlations were observed be-tween UCLA activity score and either KOOS-12 (Spearman's rho: 0.1961; p < 0.001), ASES-8 (0.1983; p = 0.004), or EQ-5D-5 L (0.2078; p < 0.001). A significant, weak, negative correlation was observed between physical activity and BFOM (-0.2183; p < 0.001). Significant differences in function between groups (moderate vs. inactive or low physical activity) were not clinically important. Participants with obesity, from the eldest age category (i.e. ≥75), or who identified as Malay or female, were less physically active than those with a healthy BMI, below the age of 54, or who identified as Chinese or male, respectively. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals in Asia should be aware of the large proportion of people with knee osteoarthritis who are either inactive or have low physical activity levels. Screening for, and offering interventions to promote, physical activity and its correlates should be prioritised.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Male , Female , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Quality of Life , Kinesiophobia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Self Report , Self Efficacy , Longitudinal Studies , Exercise
2.
Pain ; 164(12): 2642-2652, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556378

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The experience of pain associated with labour is complex and challenging to assess. A range of pain measurement tools are reported in the literature. This review aimed to identify current tools used in research to assess labour pain across the past decade and to evaluate their implementation and adequacy when used in the context of labour pain. A literature search was conducted in databases MEDLINE and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, using search terms relating to labour, pain, and measurement. A total of 363 articles were selected for inclusion. Most studies (89.9%) assessed pain as a unidimensional experience, with the most common tool being the Visual Analogue Scale, followed by the Numerical Rating Scale. Where studies assessed pain as a multidimensional experience, the most common measurement tool was the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Only 4 studies that used multidimensional tools selected a tool that was capable of capturing positive affective states. Numerous variations in the implementation of scales were noted. This included 35 variations found in the wording of the upper and lower anchors of the Visual Analogue Scale, some assessment tools not allowing an option for "no pain," and instances where only sections of validated tools were used. It is clear that development of a standardised pain assessment strategy, which evaluates the multidimensions of labour pain efficiently and effectively and allows for both positive and negative experiences of pain to be reported, is needed.


Subject(s)
Labor Pain , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Labor Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement/methods , Emotions
3.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 38(13): 2757-2770, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110961

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Pain and Movement Reasoning Model is a tool to assist clinical reasoning. It was created for physiotherapists to use in musculoskeletal outpatient clinics but may be appropriate in other clinical contexts. The Model has also been used in physiotherapy education. OBJECTIVE: To determine physiotherapists' perceptions of the appropriateness (suitability) and benefit (utility) of the Pain and Movement Reasoning Model across clinical contexts in hospital and community practice. Methods Physiotherapists from two health networks in Melbourne, Australia, received training in using the Model and over 4-6 weeks applied it in their clinical interactions. Drawing on a deductive phenomenological approach, transcripts from focus groups and interviews were analysed to determine the suitability and utility of the Model across clinical areas. RESULTS: Twenty-nine physiotherapists from 12 different clinical areas participated. Two themes represented the participants' comments: Suitability for Practice and Utility in Practice. Participants reported the approach to clinical reasoning, promoted by the Model, aligned with existing physiotherapy practice. Enhancements to practice included more comprehensive assessment, selection of broader management techniques and increased confidence with reasoning and explaining the complexity of pain to patients. Participants described using the Model for developing junior staff and training postgraduate students. They also saw potential in adapting the Model for other disciplines and for other multifactorial conditions. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists working in a range of clinical contexts considered the Pain and Movement Reasoning Model appropriate and beneficial in clinical practice and in teaching. Further evaluation of the Model in wider settings is warranted.


Subject(s)
Physical Therapists , Humans , Physical Therapists/education , Physical Therapy Modalities , Qualitative Research , Focus Groups , Pain
4.
Women Birth ; 32(1): 28-38, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pain experience associated with labour is complex. Literature indicates psychosocial and environmental determinants of labour pain, and yet methods to support women usually target physiological attributes via pharmacological interventions. AIM: To provide an update of our understanding of labour pain based on modern pain science. The review aims to help explain why women can experience labour pain so differently - why some cope well, whilst others experience great suffering. This understanding is pertinent to providing optimal support to women in labour. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in databases Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PsycINFO, using search terms labor/labour, childbirth, pain, experience and perception. Thirty-one papers were selected for inclusion. FINDINGS: Labour pain is a highly individual experience. It is a challenging, emotional and meaningful pain and is very different from other types of pain. Key determinants and influences of labour pain were identified and grouped into cognitive, social and environmental factors. CONCLUSION: If a woman can sustain the belief that her pain is purposeful (i.e. her body working to birth her baby), if she interprets her pain as productive (i.e. taking her through a process to a desired goal) and the birthing environment is safe and supportive, it would be expected she would experience the pain as a non-threatening, transformative life event. Changing the conceptualisation of labour pain to a purposeful and productive pain may be one step to improving women's experiences of it, and reducing their need for pain interventions.


Subject(s)
Labor Pain/psychology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
5.
Pain Rep ; 4(6): e794, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984299

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Survivors of torture are for many reasons at particularly high risk for inadequate assessment and management of pain. Among the many health problems associated with torture, persistent pain is frequent, particularly pain in the musculoskeletal system. The pathophysiology underlying post-torture pain is largely unknown, but pain inflicted in torture may have profound effects on neurophysiology and pain processing. METHODS: A narrative review of assessment and treatment studies, informed by clinical experience, was undertaken. RESULTS: The clinical presentation in survivors of torture shares characteristics with other chronic primary pain syndromes, including chronic widespread pain. Unfortunately, such pain is often misunderstood and dismissed as a manifestation of psychological distress, both in specialist psychosocially oriented torture services and in mainstream health care. This means that pain is at risk of not being recognized, assessed, or managed as a problem in its own right. CONCLUSIONS: The available research literature on rehabilitation for torture survivors is predominantly targeted at mental health problems, and studies of effectiveness of pain management in torture survivors are lacking. Rehabilitation is identified as a right in the UN Convention on Torture, aiming to restore as far as possible torture survivors' health and capacity for full participation in society. It is therefore important that pain and its consequences are adequately addressed in rehabilitative efforts. This article summarizes the current status on assessment and management of pain problems in the torture survivor.

6.
Pain Res Manag ; 2018: 6810412, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30154945

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to investigate the difference in response to a motor imagery task between individuals with and without painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). The participants were 24 adults with and without TMD (TMD and control group, resp.). A set of photographic images of the profile view of a person's head and neck and a hand and a foot were presented in a random order. The set consisted of six different orientations with rotations of each image at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 degrees and included left and right representations. The participants were required to view the image and make a decision as to whether it was a left or a right side presented, that is, mental rotation (MR) task. Data were collected on 48 tasks (including left and right) at each orientation for each body part. Reaction times (RTs) for correct answers and accuracy in making the left or right judgements were recorded. The RT was slower in the TMD group than in the control group. The RT for the profile image was slower than those for the hand and foot images. For images that were 180 degrees, the RT was slower and the accuracy was lower than those for five of the other image orientations. The judgements made about the 180-degree rotated image were more inaccurate compared to images of all other orientations among all types of stimuli.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/complications , Facial Pain/rehabilitation , Imagery, Psychotherapy/methods , Motor Activity/physiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anthropometry , Facial Pain/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Orientation/physiology , Pain Measurement , Photic Stimulation , Reaction Time/physiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 157, 2017 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28558667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The majority of women experience pain during labour and childbirth, however not all women experience it in the same way. In order to develop a more complete understanding of labour pain, this study aimed to examine women's experiences within the perspective of modern pain science. A more complete understanding of this phenomenon can then guide the development of interventions to enhance women's experiences and potentially reduce their need for pharmacological intervention. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using phenomenology as the theoretical framework. Data were collected from 21 nulliparous women, birthing at one of two large maternity services, through face-to-face interviews and written questionnaires. Data were analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis approach. RESULTS: The data from this study suggest that a determining factor of a woman's experience of pain during labour is the meaning she ascribes to it. When women interpret the pain as productive and purposeful, it is associated with positive cognitions and emotions, and they are more likely to feel they can cope. Alternatively, when women interpret the pain as threatening, it is associated with negative cognitions and emotions and they tend to feel they need help from external methods of pain control. The social environment seems particularly important in shaping a woman's pain experience by influencing her interpretation of the context of the pain, and in doing so can change its meaning. The context and social environment are dynamic and can also change throughout labour. CONCLUSION: A determining factor in a woman's experience of pain during labour is its perceived meaning which can then influence how the woman responds to the pain. The meaning of the pain is shaped by the social environment and other contextual factors within which it is experienced. Focussed promotion of labour pain as a productive and purposeful pain and efforts to empower women to utilise their inner capacity to cope, as well as careful attention to women's cognitions and the social environment around them may improve women's experiences of labour pain and decrease their need for pain interventions.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Labor Pain/psychology , Pain Management/psychology , Parturition/psychology , Adult , Australia , Cognition , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Social Support
9.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 46(3): 102-110, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28417134

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety sensitivity has been proposed as a psychological vulnerability factor for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Studies have also supported the protective role of resilience for overcoming the negative effects of trauma exposure. Given the linkages between anxiety sensitivity, resilience, trauma exposure and post-traumatic stress, this study explored the potential moderating roles of anxiety sensitivity and resilience on the association between trauma history and PTSD symptoms in a sample of individuals with chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients with chronic pain were recruited from a large public hospital. Patients who had pain lasting for more than 3 months and a pain intensity rating of at least 4/10 were included. The study participants were administered measures of PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist - Civilian Version), resilience (Brief Resilient Coping Scale) and anxiety sensitivity (Anxiety Sensitivity Index). RESULTS: An analysis of outcome measures indicated that anxiety sensitivity and resilience were independently associated with PTSD symptoms, where ßs were 0.57 and -0.23, respectively. The relationship between trauma and PTSD symptom severity was also moderated by anxiety sensitivity. Trauma history was associated with higher PTSD symptom severity only in those with high anxiety sensitivity. However, contrary to the hypotheses, resilience did not serve as a moderator. CONCLUSION: There are potential benefits of PTSD interventions that increase resilience and decrease anxiety sensitivity in individuals with chronic pain, especially for those who have experienced a traumatic event. Given that the presence of PTSD symptomatology in chronic pain populations negatively impact patient well-being, it would be important for clinicians to assess, monitor and treat PTSD in individuals with chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Psychological Trauma/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Humans , Psychological Trauma/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Singapore/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology
10.
Ann Emerg Med ; 67(5): 679-80, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27106376

Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Pain , Humans
11.
Midwifery ; 31(7): 708-12, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25886966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to develop an understanding of women's experiences of pain associated with childbirth and the assessment of labour pain. This exploratory study, informed by modern pain science, sought to explore women's retrospective reports of their pain experience during labour and to ascertain what pain assessment strategies might be acceptable in maternity care or future research. DESIGN: a qualitative study was performed using phenomenology as the theoretical framework. Data were collected from semistructured telephone interviews. Thematic analysis of transcripts was performed. SETTING: Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 19 women - both primiparous and multiparous - who gave birth in a large maternity hospital, either in a midwife-led birth centre or with standard hospital birth suite care were interviewed in the month following labour and birth. FINDINGS: two themes were identified in post-birth interviews that related to pain assessment. The first theme is the acceptability of pain assessment and reflects the interview structure, drawing on responses from a set question that asked what pain assessment strategies would be acceptable. The second theme emerged from women's comments about measurement accuracy, including the limitations of using a scale with a static upper limit and the changing nature of labour pain. KEY CONCLUSIONS: a woman-centred approach demands pain assessment that matches each woman's preference for mode and timing and captures the multiple dimensions of pain. Women describe the need for an expanding scale to accommodate the progressive modifications of their conception of what is extreme pain. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: whenever a series of pain ratings is required, researchers and health professionals need to find ways to adjust for the fluctuations in pain scale interpretation.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Labor Pain/psychology , Patient-Centered Care , Adult , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Labor Pain/nursing , Midwifery , Pain Measurement , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Victoria
12.
Aust Fam Physician ; 44(3): 127-32, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25770578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New mothers frequently experience breastfeeding problems, in particular nipple pain. This is often attributed to compression, skin damage, infection or dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To outline an integrated approach to breastfeeding pain assessment that seeks to enhance current practice. DISCUSSION: Our clinical reasoning model resolves the complexity of pain into three categories: local stimulation, external influences and central modulation. Tissue pathology, damage or inflammation leads to local stimulation of nociceptors. External influences such as creams and breast pumps, as well as factors related to the mother, the infant and the maternal-infant interaction, may exacerbate the pain. Central nervous system modulation includes the enhancement of nociceptive transmission at the spinal cord and modification of the descending inhibitory influences. A broad range of factors can modulate pain through central mechanisms including maternal illness, exhaustion, lack of support, anxiety, depression or history of abuse. General practitioners (GPs) can use this model to explain nipple pain in complex settings, thus increasing management options for women.


Subject(s)
Breast Diseases/therapy , Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Neurophysiology/methods , Nipples , Pain Management/methods , Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Infant
13.
Midwifery ; 30(9): 1029-35, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24820004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: labour pain is unique and complex. In order to develop a more sophisticated understanding of labour pain this exploratory study aimed to examine women's experiences of labour pain within the perspective of modern pain science. An improved understanding of labour pain will assist in informing and enhancing pain management approaches. DESIGN: a qualitative study was performed using phenomenology as the theoretical framework. Data were collected from telephone interviews. Thematic analysis of transcripts was performed. SETTING: Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: a diverse sample of 19 women who gave birth in a large maternity hospital was interviewed in the month following labour. FINDINGS: the data suggest that a woman's state of mind during labour may set the stage for the cognitive and evaluative processes that construct and give meaning to her pain experience. Women's descriptions of their pain experiences suggested two states of mind. The first was characterised by the mind remaining focussed, open and accepting of the inner experience, including pain. This state tended to be accompanied by a more positive reporting of the labour experience. The second was characterised by the mind being distracted and thought processes featured pain catastrophising, self-judgment and a negative evaluation of pain. Although these two mind states appeared to be distinct, women could shift between them during labour. Women's evaluations of their pain were further influenced by their personal beliefs, desires, the context and the social environment. KEY CONCLUSIONS: women's state of mind during labour may set the stage for the cognitive and evaluative processes that construct and give meaning to their pain experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: developing interventions for labour pain that promote positive evaluative processes and cultivate a state of mind focussing on the present may improve women's experiences of labour pain.


Subject(s)
Labor Pain/psychology , Adult , Catastrophization/psychology , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Mindfulness , Pain Management/psychology , Pregnancy
14.
Man Ther ; 19(3): 270-6, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24582733

ABSTRACT

Pain is no longer considered to be simply the transmission of nociception, but rather an output subsequent to the complex interactions of homeostatic systems. Manual therapists' clinical reasoning needs to incorporate this complexity in order to develop individualised effective treatment plans. Pain classification strategies attempting to assist clinical reasoning traditionally define multiple types of pain - nociceptive, neuropathic, centrally sensitised - potentially fitting elements of the pain experience to linear independent systems, rather than embracing the multiple dimensions. It is our contention that pain should not be classified unidimensionally. In all pain states consideration should be given to the combined influence of physiological, cognitive, emotional and social inputs, all of which have the potential to influence nociception. The Pain and Movement Reasoning Model presented in this paper attempts to capture the complexity of the human pain experience by integrating these multiple dimensions into a decision making process. Three categories have been created to facilitate this - central modulation, regional influences, and local stimulation. The Model allows for the identification of a predominant element to become the focus of treatment but also for the identification of changes to clinical presentation, where new treatment targets can emerge.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Musculoskeletal Pain/classification , Nociceptive Pain/classification , Pain Measurement/methods , Decision Making , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Movement , Musculoskeletal Pain/rehabilitation , Nociceptive Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Management/methods , Pain Perception/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology
15.
Man Ther ; 17(5): e14; author reply e15, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22796391
18.
Physiotherapy ; 97(1): 55-8, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21295238

ABSTRACT

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was adopted as one of the key models to support early health professional learning across a suite of new preregistration health science courses. It was decided that an online resource should be developed to enable students, course designers and teaching staff, across all disciplines, to have access to the same definitions, government policies and other supporting information on disability. As part of the comprehensive curriculum review, enquiry-based learning was adopted as the educational approach. Enquiry-based learning promotes deeper learning by encouraging students to engage in authentic challenges. As such, it was important that the online resource was not merely a site for accessing content, but enabled students to make decisions about where else to explore for credible information about the ICF. The selection of a host location that all students and staff could access meant that the resource could not be located in the existing online learning management system. Construction using software being trialled by the library at La Trobe University allowed for the required access, as well as alignment with an enquiry-based learning approach. Consultation for the content of the online resource included formal and informal working groups on curriculum review. The published version included resources from the World Health Organization, examples of research completed within different disciplines, a test of knowledge and a preformatted search page. The format of the online resource allows for updating of information, and feedback on the utilisation of the software has been used to enhance the student experience. The key issues for the development of this online resource were accessibility for students and staff, alignment with the adopted educational approach, consultation with all disciplines, and ease of modification of information and format once published.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Internet , Physical Therapy Specialty/education , Physical Therapy Specialty/methods , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Education, Distance/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...