ABSTRACT
Introduction: The importance of the use of contrast sensitivity (CS) tests in orthoptic practice is well established. However, despite the clinical relevance the implementation within clinical care is known to be variable. There are no known studies that investigate the use of CS tests in Orthoptic clinics in the UK, therefore the aim of this study is to gather information from Orthoptists in the UK on their opinion of CS and use of CS testing in clinical practice, now and in the future. Methods: An online survey was distributed via JISC to the British and Irish Orthoptic Journal newsletter three times over a period of four weeks in June 2021 inviting practising orthoptists in the United Kingdom to complete. The questionnaire comprised of a series of questions regarding current use with free text responses for additional information. Results: There were 84 responses to the survey. The preferred test for adult and children testing is Pelli Robson with 50% reporting use of this test. 56% felt there is a need for a new CS test for young children, 12% said no and 32% were unsure. The highest percentage (57.1%) of participants were confident to some degree that their preferred test gave them useful clinical information. Conclusion: The result of the survey demonstrates the variability of CS testing currently in orthoptic practice in the UK. It also highlights the lack of currently available tests for children for CS testing, which may be addressed by the addition of the new Double Happy CS test.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation from a burn or related injury can be a lengthy and painful process. OBJECTIVES: The present study explored the experiences of staff and patients of inpatient goal planning used on a rehabilitation ward within a regional burns centre. DESIGN: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Patients and staff were recruited from The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, South Wales, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve participants were recruited and interviewed in two phases. Phase one included six staff members who had been involved in delivering goal planning sessions and phase two included six former inpatients who had participated in goal planning during their rehabilitation in hospital. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified for staff: benefits for patients and families, process and structure and challenges of the process. For patients, the three main themes identified were: role of goal planning in rehabilitation, tailoring the programme around the patient and encountering challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the narratives of staff and patients suggest the use of goal planning in inpatient recovery and rehabilitation in a burns centre is very beneficial. Although challenges were reported, this investigation yields potential for goal planning to be a successful rehabilitation strategy.
Subject(s)
Burns , Inpatients , Humans , Goals , Burns/therapy , Motivation , Qualitative Research , Patient Outcome AssessmentABSTRACT
Androstenol has been reported to influence judgements of attractiveness and to affect participants' mood. In the present study, participants were asked to sniff androstenol or a control odour (pure ethanol) unilaterally with the left or right nostril. Subsequently, they rated the attractiveness of photographs of the opposite sex and their own feelings on four mood scales. Participants rated the photographs as significantly more attractive after sniffing androstenol compared with the control odour. This did not depend upon androstenol being perceived as pleasant. Androstenol made male participants feel more lively, and both male and female participants more sexy, when sniffed through the right compared with the left nostril. Participants rated themselves as more irritable and aggressive when exposed to androstenol through the left nostril. The findings are discussed in relation to the effects of arousal on attraction and in the context of current theories of hemispheric differences in emotion.
