Time-Action Profile of Technosphere Insulin in Children with Type 1 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Technosphere insulin (TI) is an inhaled dry powder ultra-rapid-acting insulin. This report describes the results of the first study of TI in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics (PK) of TI and the effect of TI on circulating glucose concentrations were evaluated in a single-arm study that enrolled children ages 8-17 years with T1D for more than 1 year, on a stable multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) regimen, and meeting pre-defined pulmonary function testing criteria (at least 70% predicted). To assess PK, subjects received an individualized single preprandial dose of TI (4-12 U, in 4-U increments) via oral inhalation, based on their usual meal-time subcutaneously injected rapid-acting insulin dose and meal content. Serum insulin and blood glucose were measured at - 30 to 250 min relative to dosing. RESULTS: Twenty-seven children with T1D participated in this single-dose PK study. Mean subject age was 13.3 years (59% female; 81.5% White). Mean serum insulin Cmax (maximum concentration) was 77.3, 119.15, and 207.7 µU/mL for doses of 4, 8, and 12 U, respectively. Tmax occurred at 10.5, 13.9, and 14.6 min post-dose for 4, 8, and 12 U. Glucose lowering 30-60 min post-dose was consistent with the PK profile. CONCLUSION: Serum insulin rapidly increased post-dose and returned to baseline by 120 min. The data suggests the PK of TI in youth with T1D ages 8-17 years was similar to that seen in previous adult studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02527265.

"High-risk" host cell proteins (HCPs): A multi-company collaborative view.

Host cell proteins (HCPs) are process-related impurities that may copurify with biopharmaceutical drug products. Within this class of impurities there are some that are more problematic. These problematic HCPs can be considered high-risk and can include those that are immunogenic, biologically active, or enzymatically active with the potential to degrade either product molecules or excipients used in formulation. Some have been shown to be difficult to remove by purification. Why should the biopharmaceutical industry worry about these high-risk HCPs? What approach could be taken to understand the origin of its copurification and address these high-risk HCPs? To answer these questions, the BioPhorum Development Group HCP Workstream initiated a collaboration among its 26-company team with the goal of industry alignment around high-risk HCPs. The information gathered through literature searches, company experiences, and surveys were used to compile a list of frequently seen problematic/high-risk HCPs. These high-risk HCPs were further classified based on their potential impact into different risk categories. A step-by-step recommendation is provided for establishing a comprehensive control strategy based on risk assessments for monitoring and/or eliminating the known impurity from the process that would be beneficial to the biopharmaceutical industry.

RESULTS OF A 24-WEEK TRIAL OF TECHNOSPHERE INSULIN VERSUS INSULIN ASPART IN TYPE 2 DIABETES.

OBJECTIVE: To compare glycemic efficacy of Technosphere insulin (TI) versus that of insulin aspart (IA), each added to basal insulin, in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This randomized, 24-week trial included subjects aged from 18 to 80 years who were treated with subcutaneous insulin for 3 months and had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of 7.0% to 11.5%. After receiving stabilized insulin glargine doses during a 4-week lead in, the subjects were randomized to TI or IA. The primary end point was an HbA1C change from baseline, with the differences analyzed by equivalence analyses. RESULTS: In the overall cohort (N = 309; males, 23.3%), mean (SD) age was 58.5 (8.4) years, body mass index was 30.8 (4.7) kg/m2, weight was 82.2 (13.6) kg, and duration of diabetes was 12.2 (7.1) years. An intention-to-treat cohort had 150 subjects randomized to TI (mean [SD] HbA1C: 8.9% [1.1%]) and 154 randomized to IA (mean [SD] HbA1C: 9.0% [1.3%]). At 24 weeks, mean (SD) HbA1C value declined to 7.9% (1.3%) and 7.7% (1.1%) in the TI and IA cohorts, respectively. A treatment difference of 0.26% was not statistically significant, but the predefined equivalency margin was not met. Subjects receiving TI lost 0.78 kg compared to baseline; subjects receiving IA gained 0.23 kg (P =.0007). The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was lower for the TI cohort, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Both TI and IA resulted in significant and clinically meaningful HbA1C reductions. TI also resulted in significant and clinically meaningful weight reductions. These data support the use of inhaled insulin as a treatment option for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Understanding inhaled Technosphere Insulin: Results of an early randomized trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an inhaled insulin. Studies comparing TI with short-acting insulin analogues provide important insights on efficacy, dosing, and time course of action. METHODS: Planned enrollment of 230 subjects was limited to 138 due to premature study discontinuation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a noninferiority of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 0.4% for TI compared with insulin lispro (LIS) in a 16-week phase 3 randomized clinical trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: HbA1c values were similar in the TI and LIS groups at the beginning of the trial (7.8% and 7.6%, respectively) and at trial endpoint (7.7% and 7.6%, respectively). Least squares mean changes from baseline were similar between study groups. Glucose values after a standard meal were significantly lower with TI in the first 90 minutes post meal compared with LIS. Mild or moderate hypoglycemia event rates were also significantly lower with TI compared with LIS (5.97 vs 8.01, respectively; P = .0269). Cough was the most commonly reported adverse event with TI. Pulmonary function as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second was not different between groups at baseline, 16 weeks, or 4 weeks off study drug. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c was unchanged and overall glucose control was comparable between groups. Treatment with TI resulted in improved post-meal glucose and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with LIS.

Improving Chinese hamster ovary host cell protein ELISA using Ella®: an automated microfluidic platform.

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are a mammalian cell line used in the production of therapeutic proteins. Host cell proteins (HCPs) are process-related impurities that are derived from the host cell expression system. During biopharmaceutical drug development, removal of HCPs is required. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a common technique to quantitate HCPs, but is a labor-intensive process that takes up to 7 h. Ella® is an automated instrument that utilizes microfluidics and glass nanoreactors to quantitate HCPs in 75 min using similar ELISA reagents. The antibodies and antigens are captured on three distinct glass nanoreactors, resulting in sensitive reproducible data. Our results indicate that Ella quantitates CHO HCPs with precision, accuracy, sensitivity and trends comparable with our traditional CHO HCP ELISA.

A novel method for removing polyethyleneimine from biopharmaceutical samples: improving assay sensitivity of residual DNA qPCR.

Polyethyleneimine (PEI) is a flocculent that is widely used in the downstream purification of monoclonal antibodies. It is an in-process residual that is carried through the drug purification process and strongly inhibits residual DNA quantitation by real-time quantitative PCR assay. Very high sample dilutions (e.g., 1:10,000) can overcome the interference of PEI, but at the cost of DNA assay sensitivity. Diluting samples poses a significant risk to the assay sensitivity needed to satisfy regulatory requirements on the quantitation of residual genomic DNA present per dose (i.e., 10 ng/dose). Removing PEI while retaining DNA, by the use of sodium dodecyl sulfate, heparin and/or sarkosyl can overcome the interference of PEI and allow a more accurate quantitation of residual DNA.

Host Cell Proteins: The Hidden Side of Biosimilarity Assessment.

One major concern with biosimilars is that small differences compared with reference products might lead to unforeseen immunogenicity, thus affecting patient safety and drug efficacy. Differences could be due to either post-translational modifications of the therapeutic protein and/or to traces of impurities from the manufacturing process. The results presented in this communication illustrate the efforts to assess "biosimilarity" of a biosimilar candidate to a reference product for a specific group of process-related impurities, the host cell proteins (HCP). Extensive characterization of HCP in the drug substance of a biosimilar candidate revealed the identity of HCP copurifying with the protein of interest and guided process development to improve overall HCP clearance in the downstream process. The data presented illustrate the challenge of matching the reference product on either quantitative or qualitative aspects of HCP impurities.

Incremental impact of breast cancer SNP panel on risk classification in a screening population of white and African American women.

Breast cancer risk prediction remains imperfect, particularly among non-white populations. This study examines the impact of including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles in risk prediction for white and African American women undergoing screening mammogram. Using a prospective cohort study, standard risk information and buccal swabs were collected at the time of screening mammography. A 12 SNP panel was performed by deCODE genetics. Five-year and lifetime risks incorporating SNPs were calculated by multiplying estimated Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) risk by the total genetic risk ratio. Concordance between the BCRAT and the combined model (BCRAT + SNPs) in identifying high-risk women was measured using the kappa statistic. SNP data were available for 810 women (39 % African American, 55 % white). The mean BCRAT 5-year risk was 1.71 % for whites and 1.18 % for African Americans. Mean genetic risk ratios were 1.09 in whites and 1.29 in African Americans. Among whites, three SNPs had higher frequencies, and among African Americans, seven SNPs had higher and four had lower high-risk allele frequencies than previously reported. Agreement between the BCRAT and the combined model was relatively low for identifying high-risk women (5-year κ = 0.54, lifetime κ = 0.36). Addition of SNPs had the greatest effect among African Americans, with 12.4 % identified as having high-5-year risk by BCRAT, but 33 % by the combined model. A greater proportion of African Americans were reclassified as having high-5-year risk than whites using the combined model (21 vs. 10 %). The addition of SNPs to the BCRAT reclassifies the high-risk status of some women undergoing screening mammography, particularly African Americans. Further research is needed to determine the clinical validity and utility of the SNP panel for use in breast cancer risk prediction, particularly among African Americans for whom these risk alleles have generally not been validated.

Safe aortic arch clamping in patients with patent internal thoracic artery grafts.

In patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass with a left internal thoracic artery graft, clamping the aorta proximal to the left subclavian artery during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair can precipitate major cardiac complications. Many centers use hypothermic circulatory arrest to obviate the need for aortic clamping in these cases. Herein, we describe the successful application of an alternative approach to this problem: performing left carotid-subclavian bypass before aneurysm repair. This technique allows aortic cross-clamping proximal to the left subclavian artery, prevents major intraoperative cardiac complications, and avoids cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Randomized comparison of cold blood and cold crystalloid renal perfusion for renal protection during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: More effective adjuncts are needed to reduce the incidence of acute renal injury after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. The purpose of this randomized trial was to determine whether renal perfusion with cold blood provides better protection against renal ischemia than perfusion with cold crystalloid in patients undergoing TAAA repair with left heart bypass. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled. Strict inclusion criteria were used, including planned Crawford extent II or III TAAA repair with left heart bypass. The patients were randomly assigned to receive intermittent renal perfusion with either 4 degrees C lactated Ringer's solution (n = 86) or 4 degrees C blood (n = 86). Renal complications within 10 days of operation were stratified by renal dysfunction score (RDS). Postoperative changes in the levels of five urinary biomarkers-retinol binding protein, alpha-1 microglobulin, microalbumin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and intestinal alkaline phosphatase-were compared to assess potential differences in subclinical renal injury. RESULTS: Although total ischemic times were longer in the cold blood group, unprotected ischemic times were similar between the two groups. Twenty-seven patients in the cold blood group (31%) and 21 patients in the cold crystalloid group (24%) had peak RDS >or=2 (serum creatinine >50% above baseline; P = .4). There were no differences between the cold blood and cold crystalloid groups in the incidence of early death (7/86 [8%] vs 5/86 [6%], respectively; P = .8) or renal failure requiring hemodialysis (3/86 [3%] in both groups). Changes in renal biomarker levels were also similar in the two groups. Spinal cord deficits developed in 5 patients in the cold blood group (6%); there were no such deficits in the cold crystalloid group (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Cold renal perfusion during TAAA repair provides effective protection against renal injury. Using cold blood instead of cold crystalloid does not enhance renal protection.