Evaluation of a toolkit for standardizing clinical measures of muscle tone.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new portable toolkit for quantifying upper and lower extremity muscle tone in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS). APPROACH: Cross-sectional, multi-site, observational trial to test and validate a new technology. SETTING: Neurorehabilitation clinics at tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Four cohorts UMNS patient, >6 mo post acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy, and a sample of healthy age-matched adult controls. MEASURES: Strength: grip, elbow flexor and extensor, and knee extensor; range of motion (ROM): passive ROM (contracture) and passive-active ROM (paresis); objective spasticity: stretch-reflex test for elbow, and pendulum test for knee; subjective spasticity: modified Ashworth scale scores for elbow and knee flexors and extensors. RESULTS: Measures were acquired for 103 patients from three rehabilitation clinics. Results for patient cohorts were consistent with the literature. Grip strength correlated significantly with elbow muscle strength and all patient populations were significantly weaker in upper- and lower-extremity compared to controls. Strength and paresis were correlated for elbow and knee but neither correlated with contracture. Elbow spasticity correlated with strength and paresis but not contracture. Knee spasticity correlated with strength, and subjective spasticity correlated with contracture. SIGNIFICANCE: The BioTone™ toolkit provided comprehensive objective measures for assessing muscle tone in patients with UMNS. The toolkit could be useful for standardizing outcomes measures in clinical trials and for routine practice.

Predictive value of the pendulum test for assessing knee extensor spasticity.

BACKGROUND: The pendulum test is commonly used to quantify knee extensor spasticity, but it is currently unknown to what extent common pendulum test metrics can detect spasticity in patients with neurological injury or disease, and if the presence of flexor spasticity influences the test outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 131 knees, from 93 patients, across four different patient cohorts. Clinical data included Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores for knee extensors and flexors, and years since diagnosis. BioTone™ measures included extensor strength, passive and active range of motion, and pendulum tests of most affected or both knees. Pendulum test metrics included the relaxation index (RI), 1st flexion amplitude (F1amp) and plateau angle (Plat), where RI=F1amp/Plat. Two-way ANOVA tests were used to determine if pendulum test metrics were influenced by the degree of knee flexor spasticity graded by the MAS, and ANCOVA was used to test for confounding effects of age, years since injury, strength and range of motion (ROM). In order to identify the best pendulum test metrics, Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis and logistic regression (LR) analysis were used to classify knees by spasticity status (none or any) and severity (low/moderate or high/severe). RESULTS: Pendulum test metrics for knee extensors were not influenced by degree of flexor spasticity, age, years since injury, strength or ROM of the limb. RI, F1amp and Plat were > 70% accurate in classifying knees by presence of clinical spasticity (from the MAS), but were less accurate (< 70%) for grading spasticity level. The best classification accuracy was obtained using F1amp and Plat independently in the model rather than using RI alone. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the pendulum test has good predictive value for detecting the presence of extensor spasticity, independent of the existence of flexor spasticity. However, the ability to grade spasticity level as measured by MAS using the RI and/or F1amp may be limited. Further study is warranted to explore if the pendulum test is suitable for quantifying more severe spasticity.

Elbow spasticity during passive stretch-reflex: clinical evaluation using a wearable sensor system.

BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a prevalent chronic condition among persons with upper motor neuron syndrome that significantly impacts function and can be costly to treat. Clinical assessment is most often performed with passive stretch-reflex tests and graded on a scale, such as the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). However, these scales are limited in sensitivity and are highly subjective. This paper shows that a simple wearable sensor system (angle sensor and 2-channel EMG) worn during a stretch-reflex assessment can be used to more objectively quantify spasticity in a clinical setting. METHODS: A wearable sensor system consisting of a fibre-optic goniometer and 2-channel electromyography (EMG) was used to capture data during administration of the passive stretch-reflex test for elbow flexor and extensor spasticity. A kinematic model of unrestricted passive joint motion was used to extract metrics from the kinematic and EMG data to represent the intensity of the involuntary reflex. Relationships between the biometric results and clinical measures (MAS, isometric muscle strength and passive range of motion) were explored. RESULTS: Preliminary results based on nine patients with varying degrees of flexor and extensor spasticity showed that kinematic and EMG derived metrics were strongly correlated with one another, were correlated positively (and significantly) with clinical MAS, and negatively correlated (though mostly non-significant) with isometric muscle strength. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a wearable sensor system used in conjunction with a simple kinematic model can capture clinically relevant features of elbow spasticity during stretch-reflex testing in a clinical environment.