Large within-day variation in cyclosporine absorption: circadian variation or food effect?

With the recent focus of monitoring cyclosporine (CsA) therapy using measures of CsA absorption, it is important to understand published reports of diurnal variation in CsA exposure. In 10 renal transplant patients, CsA concentrations were measured 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after both the morning and the evening doses and in a repeat session at least 1 wk later. Both area under the curve for the final 4 h after cyclosporine dose and cyclosporine concentrate 2 h after the cyclosporine dose were more than two-fold higher after the morning dose in both sessions. Because the morning levels were collected in a fasted condition and the evening ones in a fed condition, the study was extended to collect evening levels after fasting. The area under the curve for the final 4 h after cyclosporine dose and cyclosporine concentrate 2 h after the cyclosporine dose values observed now were comparable to the morning fasted values. That the large diurnal variation was due to variation in food consumption, as opposed to a biologic circadian rhythm affecting CsA absorption, has significant implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine reduction in stable patients greater than 12 months after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: For stable kidney-transplant recipients receiving triple drug therapy with cyclosporine (CsA), prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), it remains unclear what is the optimal dose of CsA beyond the first 6 to 12 months after transplantation. Complete CsA withdrawal has been associated with a significant incidence of acute rejection and, in some studies, chronic rejection as well. METHODS: We performed an open, prospectively randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine whether CsA could be safely reduced by 50%. At 1 year or more posttransplant, 64 patients were randomized to either continue their stable-maintenance CsA dose (control group, n=32) or to lower their CsA dose by 50% over a 2 month period (CsA reduction group, n=32). All patients had stable renal-allograft function at the time of enrollment. RESULTS: Within 6 months of randomization, no episode of acute rejection or graft loss occurred in either group. Patients in the CsA reduction group had a slight but significant increase in their glomerular filtration rate and a trend towards lower serum creatinine. There was also a significant decrease in mean systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and serum uric acid levels in the CsA reduction group. No significant changes in any of these parameters were observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a strategy consisting of a 50% CsA reduction is safe and is not associated with the increased risk of acute rejection observed in CsA withdrawal studies. It also has the potential to improve short-term allograft function and appears to reduce cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia.