What do kids think about kids in eyeglasses?

PURPOSE: Previous studies have examined how people feel about others who wear glasses, but no studies of children have been published on the subject. We conducted the Children's Attitudes about Kids in Eyeglasses (CAKE) study to determine how children feel about other children who wear glasses. METHODS: Subjects compared a series of 24 picture pairs and answered six questions regarding which child ...he or she would rather play with, looks better at playing sports, appears smarter (more intelligent), appears nicer, looks more shy and looks more honest. The children in each pair of pictures differed by gender, ethnicity and spectacle wear. Logistic regression was performed to determine the probability and confidence interval that a subject would pick a particular child. RESULTS: Eighty subjects between the ages of 6 and 10 years participated. The average (+/-SD) age of the subjects was 8.3 +/- 1.3 years, 42 (53%) were females, 51 (64%) were whites, 21 (26%) were blacks, and 30 (38%) wore glasses. The spectacle wearer appeared smarter (0.66, CI = 0.60-0.71) and more honest (0.57, CI = 0.50-0.64), and children who wore glasses looked smarter regardless of whether the child picking wore glasses. Both boys (0.66, CI = 0.68-0.79) and girls (0.77, CI = 0.71-0.82) thought that boys looked better at playing sports. DISCUSSION: The old adage 'Boys never make passes at lasses who wear glasses' may be outmoded, but glasses may tend to make children look smarter and slightly more honest to their peers.

Diabetic eye examination report.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to revise a former American Optometric Association (AOA) Diabetic Eye Examination Report form and create a standard reporting form that could be implemented easily into clinical practice. METHODS: Ohio Optometric Association (OOA) members were recruited to complete the pilot Diabetic Eye Examination Report (DEER) on 5 consecutive diabetic patients. They were then instructed to send a copy of the completed form to the comanaging physician of the patient's choice. The participating optometrists and comanaging physicians were surveyed regarding the content and format of the pilot DEER. RESULTS: The pilot DEER was revised based on the survey responses and comments from 51 participating optometrists and 75 comanaging physicians, existing diabetic retinopathy examination forms, and a literature review. In general, optometrists and comanaging physicians agreed on the importance of communication (100% in both groups, 51of 51 and 75 of 75). Eighty-eight percent (45 of 51) of optometrists and 95% (71 of 75) comanaging physicians found the form to be an adequate summary. Eighty-seven percent (65 of 75) of comanaging physicians expressed interest in receiving the pilot DEER as a standard communication form concerning their diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: The new form is now available through the OOA at www.ooa.org as an initiative of Healthy People 2010. In an electronic format, it is possible for the optometrist to type information directly onto the form, making it more professional and legible. Printed forms are also available through the AOA purchasing department.