Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Res Vet Sci ; 133: 210-218, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017801

ABSTRACT

Delivery of local anaesthetic at the time of castration and tail docking (marking) could improve welfare outcomes in lambs. This study examined pain responses in lambs marked using rubber rings, with or without local anaesthetic precision injected using the Numnuts® instrument. On each of two commercial farms, 150 prime lambs aged 4 to 10 weeks, balanced for sex, were randomly allocated to 3 treatments: handled in a lambing cradle (Sham), handled and marked with rubber rings (Ring) or handled and marked with rubber rings and treated with 30 mg lignocaine using the Numnuts® instrument (NNLA). Time to mother up (one trial site only), acute pain related behaviours at 5, 20, 35 and 50 min, and postures at 10 min intervals from 60 to 180 min were recorded. NNLA lambs tended to mother up more quickly than Ring lambs (P = 0.09), and more slowly (P = 0.07) than Sham lambs. Acute pain behaviours were significantly more frequent in Ring and NNLA than Sham (P < 0.001) from 5 to 50 min. NNLA was significantly lower than Ring at 5 min (P < 0.001) and 20 min (P = 0.001). Ring and NNLA did not differ at 35 or 50 min. Abnormal postures were higher in Ring and NNLA than Sham at 60, 70, 80, 90 and 150 min (P < 0.048). Ring and NNLA did not differ at any time point between 60 and 180 min. Delivery of lignocaine with the Numnuts® instrument improved welfare outcome of lambs during the acute pain response caused by castration and tail docking with rubber rings.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/veterinary , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Orchiectomy/veterinary , Pain/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Tail/surgery , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Injections/veterinary , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Orchiectomy/adverse effects , Orchiectomy/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Rubber , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/etiology , Sheep, Domestic , Single-Blind Method
2.
J Comp Psychol ; 121(4): 440-6, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18085928

ABSTRACT

The ability of cows (Bos taurus) to perceive depth has never been experimentally investigated. If cows can perceive depth, the milking pit in commercial milking facilities may be fear provoking for dairy cows, as past research has shown that most land-dwelling species possess an instinctive fear of heights. In the current study, 12 dairy heifers (1-year-old cows) were exposed to a milking pit (depth-exposed group) and 13 heifers (control group) were exposed to a standard change in the environment while they moved through a milking facility over a 5-day treatment period. Heifers in the depth-exposed group showed a higher heart rate (p < .05) and stopped more often (p < .05) than did those in the control group; persistence of heart rate but not of behavioral responses on repeated exposures indicated that some habituation to the depth stimulus had occurred. Depth exposure had no effect on cortisol concentrations or on ease of handling. These results indicate that heifers responded differently to a change in depth than they did to a standard change in the environment and provide evidence of both depth perception and acute fear of heights in cows.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Depth Perception/physiology , Fear/physiology , Space Perception/physiology , Adaptation, Psychological , Animals , Avoidance Learning/physiology , Cattle/psychology , Dairying , Fear/psychology , Female
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...