Meeting Patient Expectations: Assessing Medical Service and Quality of Care Using the SERVQUAL Model in Dermatology Patients at a Single Center in Poland.

BACKGROUND This study applied the SERVQUAL model, a widely recognized tool for assessing the quality of services, to understand the gap between patient expectations and perceptions of care quality among 413 dermatology patients at a single medical center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort included 413 patients: 195 inpatients and 218 outpatients. The SERVQUAL model's 5 dimensions - reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness, each including multiple specific items - served as our assessment criteria. Patient responses to these items measured the perceived and expected quality of service. The service quality index (SQ), calculated as the difference between perception and expectation ratings, was the study's primary outcome measure. A negative SQ score was interpreted as patient dissatisfaction. RESULTS The study results showed a negative SQ score, which signified a discrepancy between high patient expectations and the actual perceived quality of service. The largest gap was seen in the tangibility dimension. Differences emerged based on treatment setting, with inpatient and outpatient settings showing varying expectations and perceptions. Patient sex and residential location also influenced the tangibility dimension. Employed patients and patients with diminished quality of life had heightened expectations in certain dimensions, while patients below 36 years of age expressed higher expectations in responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. CONCLUSIONS The findings emphasize the critical role of care quality in shaping patients' satisfaction and perception, particularly in dermatology. Using the SERVQUAL model, this study identified the tangibility dimension as an area needing improvement. This insight serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing patient satisfaction by addressing these unmet expectations.

The Servqual Method as an Assessment Tool of the Quality of Medical Services in Selected Asian Countries.

INTRODUCTION: The Servqual (an acronym from the words "service" and "quality") method is used to assess the quality of provided services on the basis of standardised evaluation parameters. This method is based on five gaps resulting from the discrepancy between expected and received service quality. The aim of this meta-analysis and the systematic review was to view and assess the major differences in the five dimensions of the Servqual method used to evaluate the quality of delivered health care services in selected Asian countries. Another goal of the study was to confirm the use of the Servqual method as a suitable tool for assessing the quality of health care services. METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for systemic reviews and meta-analyses. The following electronic databases for medical publications were used: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published from January 2000 to April 2020. The databases were explored with original search queries containing the following terms: "Servqual", "service quality", "Servqual model", "servqual questionnaire", "health service quality", "health care services", "patients' expectation", "patients' perception", "expectation", "perception", and "health care services", in combination using "AND" and "OR". In order to minimize bias, two researchers (PK and DK) independently performed an online search for peer-reviewed papers, using the combinations of the above-mentioned words. In addition, references of eligible publications were checked. All disagreements, regarding the inclusion or exclusion of specific studies, were resolved through consultations among all the authors. RESULTS: A total of 96 reports were identified and submitted to a preliminary screening selection. As a result of the pre-screening stage, 64 papers were qualified to further evaluation. The output of the evaluation brought 15 reported studies, meeting the pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The total number of participants was 5903 (ranging from 20 to 439 in individual reports), and 54% of them were women. Eight studies (53%) were from Iran, two from Pakistan (13%) and one each from Arabia, Malaysia, South Korea, Bangladesh, and Iraq (each-about 7%). The results showed gaps between patients' expectations and perceptions in all five dimensions of Servqual in almost each analysed study. The highest and lowest values of the gaps in quality scores were associated with the dimensions of reliability, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the method of Servqual is broadly used in various medical sectors to assess the quality of medical services provided. In addition, the study demonstrated that patients had significantly higher expectations of the medical services offered in the five dimensions studied. The results, obtained through the Servqual method, may help improve and monitor the quality of services provided by different institutions.

SERVQUAL Method as an "Old New" Tool for Improving the Quality of Medical Services: A Literature Review.

The second half of the 20th century saw the development of a new trend in the management of medical services across Europe. Those shifts were associated with the transformation of various spheres of human life, both on professional and private levels. The service market then turned back to "quality", already known in antiquity. According to Aristotle, "quality" is one of the basic categories of thought and reality of the human population. The research material was obtained from literature databases, including Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and PubMed, as well as from literature reports, including monographs, research papers (e.g., doctoral dissertations), and others. The available literature was assessed with regards to the abovementioned objectives of our study and considering possible advantages from its implementation. Therefore, the applied research method was based on a bibliographic query and desktop data analysis. The adopted research methodology hinged on exploration, compilation, analysis, and processing of data and information from available sources, resulting in drawing up of summary conclusions. The obtained data were subjected to reciprocal confrontation with an attempt to evaluate new possibilities of using the method in other medical specialties. The Servqual method enables us to learn the patient's expectations, while the service provider can identify irregularities and implement corrections. It allows the executive staff of medical facilities to change elements of medical procedures, which improves the quality of the service provided and thus increases the satisfaction and compliance of patients.