Mitochondrial Function of CKS2 Oncoprotein Links Oxidative Phosphorylation with Cell Division in Chemoradioresistant Cervical Cancer.

CDK regulatory subunit 2 (CKS2) has a nuclear function that promotes cell division and is a candidate biomarker of chemoradioresistance in cervical cancer. The underlying mechanisms are, however, not completely understood. We investigated whether CKS2 also has a mitochondrial function that augments tumor aggressiveness. Based on global gene expression data of two cervical cancer cohorts of 150 and 135 patients, we identified a set of genes correlated with CKS2 expression. Gene set enrichment analysis showed enrichment of mitochondrial cellular compartments, and the hallmarks oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and targets of the MYC oncogene in the gene set. By in situ proximity ligation assay, we showed that CKS2 formed complex with the positively correlated MYC target, mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein SSBP1, in the mitochondrion of cervix tumor samples and HeLa and SiHa cervical cancer cell lines, indicating a role in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication and thereby OXPHOS. CDK1 was found to be part of the complex. Flow cytometry analyses of HeLa cells showed cell cycle regulation of the CKS2-SSBP1 complex consistent with mtDNA replication activity. Moreover, repression of mtDNA replication and OXPHOS by acute hypoxia decreased CKS2-SSBP1 complex abundance and expression of MYC targets. By immunohistochemistry, cytoplasmic CKS2 expression was found to add to the prognostic impact of nuclear CKS2 expression in patients, suggesting that the mitochondrial function promotes tumor aggressiveness. Our study uncovers a novel link between regulation of cell division by nuclear pathways and OXPHOS in the mitochondrion that involves CKS2 and promotes chemoradioresistance of cervical cancer.

Reference MicroRNAs for RT-qPCR Assays in Cervical Cancer Patients and Their Application to Studies of HPV16 and Hypoxia Biomarkers.

MicroRNA (miRNA) expressions in tumor biopsies have shown potential as biomarkers in cervical cancer, but suitable reference RNAs for normalization of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays in patient cohorts with different clinicopathological characteristics are not available. We aimed to identify the optimal reference miRNAs and apply these to investigate the potential of miR-9-5p as human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 biomarker and miR-210-3p as hypoxia biomarker in cervical cancer. Candidate reference miRNAs were preselected in sequencing data of 90 patients and ranked in a stability analysis by RefFinder. A selection of the most stable miRNAs was evaluated by geNorm and NormFinder analyses of RT-qPCR data of 29 patients. U6 small nuclear RNA (RNU6) was also included in the evaluation. MiR-9-5p and miR-210-3p expression was assessed by RT-qPCR in 45 and 65 patients, respectively. Nine candidates were preselected in the sequencing data after excluding those associated with clinical markers, HPV type, hypoxia status, suboptimal expression levels, and low stability. In RT-qPCR assays, the combination of miR-151-5p, miR-152-3p, and miR-423-3p was identified as the most stable normalization factor across clinical markers, HPV type, and hypoxia status. RNU6 showed poor stability. By applying the optimal reference miRNAs, higher miR-9-5p expression in HPV16- than HPV18-positive tumors and higher miR-210-3p expression in more hypoxic than less hypoxic tumors were found in accordance with the sequencing data. MiR-210-3p was associated with poor outcome by both sequencing and RT-qPCR assays. In conclusion, miR-151-5p, miR-152-3p, and miR-423-3p are suitable reference miRNAs in cervical cancer. MiR-9-5p and miR-210-3p are promising HPV16 and hypoxia biomarkers, respectively.

The diverse roles of glutathione-associated cell resistance against hypericin photodynamic therapy.

The diverse responses of different cancers to treatments such as photodynamic therapy of cancer (PDT) have fueled a growing need for reliable predictive markers for treatment outcome. In the present work we have studied the differential response of two phenotypically and genotypically different breast adenocarcinoma cell lines, MCF7 and MDA-MB-231, to hypericin PDT (HYP-PDT). MDA-MB-231 cells were 70% more sensitive to HYP PDT than MCF7 cells at LD50. MCF7 were found to express a substantially higher level of glutathione peroxidase (GPX4) than MDA-MB-231, while MDA-MB-231 differentially expressed glutathione-S-transferase (GSTP1), mainly used for xenobiotic detoxification. Eighty % reduction of intracellular glutathione (GSH) by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), largely enhanced the sensitivity of the GSTP1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells to HYP-PDT, but not in MCF7 cells. Further inhibition of the GSH reduction however by carmustine (BCNU) resulted in an enhanced sensitivity of MCF7 to HYP-PDT. HYP loading studies suggested that HYP can be a substrate of GSTP for GSH conjugation as BSO enhanced the cellular HYP accumulation by 20% in MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in MCF7 cells. Studies in solutions showed that L-cysteine can bind the GSTP substrate CDNB in the absence of GSTP. This means that the GSTP-lacking MCF7 may use L-cysteine for xenobiotic detoxification, especially during GSH synthesis inhibition, which leads to L-cysteine build-up. This was confirmed by the lowered accumulation of HYP in both cell lines in the presence of BSO and the L-cysteine source NAC. NAC reduced the sensitivity of MCF7, but not MDA-MB-231, cells to HYP PDT which is in accordance with the antioxidant effects of L-cysteine and its potential as a GSTP substrate. As a conclusion we have herein shown that the different GSH based cell defense mechanisms can be utilized as predictive markers for the outcome of PDT and as a guide for selecting optimal combination strategies.

Hypoxia-independent gene expression signature associated with radiosensitisation of prostate cancer cell lines by histone deacetylase inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) like vorinostat are promising radiosensitisers in prostate cancer, but their effect under hypoxia is not known. We investigated gene expression associated with radiosensitisation of normoxic and hypoxic prostate cancer cells by vorinostat. METHODS: Cells were exposed to vorinostat under normoxia or hypoxia and subjected to gene expression profiling before irradiation and clonogenic survival analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment with vorinostat led to radiosensitisation of the intrinsically radioresistant DU 145 cells, but not the radiosensitive PC-3 and 22Rv1 cells, and was independent of hypoxia status. Knockdown experiments showed that the sensitisation was not caused by repression of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF1 or tumour protein TP53. Global deregulation of DNA repair and chromatin organisation genes was associated with radiosensitisation under both normoxia and hypoxia. A radiosensitisation signature with expression changes of 56 genes was generated and valid for both conditions. For eight signature genes, baseline expression also correlated with sensitisation, showing potential as pretreatment biomarker. The hypoxia independence of the signature was confirmed in a clinical data set. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with HDACi may overcome radioresistance of hypoxic prostate tumours by similar mechanisms as under normoxia. We propose a gene signature to predict radiosensitising effects independent of hypoxia status.