Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 99(3): 424-434, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the process of conferring academic rank or components of the promotion packet contribute to the lack of parity in academic advancement for women and individuals underrepresented in medicine (URMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospective promotion applications to the position of associate professor or professor at Mayo Clinic from January 2, 2015, through July 1, 2019. Individuals with doctorate degrees who applied for either rank were included in the study. Data collected included demographic characteristics, curriculum vitae at time of application, committee score sheets, and deferral and approval decisions. Deferral rates for women compared with men and for URMs compared with non-URMs was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of 462 people who applied for associate professor, 10% (n=46) were deferred. Those promoted had worked longer at Mayo Clinic (median, 6 years vs 2 years; P=.01), had more mentees (median, 6 vs 4; P=.02), authored more publications (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 39 [32-52] vs 30 [24-35]; P<.001), and were more likely to be on a National Institutes of Health or institutional grant (P<.05). Of the 320 people who applied for professor, 8.8% (n=28) were deferred. Those promoted had authored more publications (median [IQR], 77 [60-99] vs 56 [44-66]; P<.001) and were less likely to hold an elected office to a professional society (22.6% vs 39.3%; P=.05). There was no significant association between deferral status and sex (P>.4) or race/ethnicity (P>.9) for either rank. CONCLUSION: The process for academic advancement for professorships does not contribute to the gap in promotion rates for women and URMs.


Subject(s)
Academic Success , Medicine , United States , Male , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Ambulatory Care Facilities
2.
J Healthc Qual ; 45(2): 91-98, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36857286

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The students at Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM) wrote a call to action to medical school leadership in June 2020. The students requested help in navigating socio-political barriers that affected one another and contributed to healthcare inequities and mistrust. Using the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) tool to assess cultural competence training, our team evaluated the baseline 2017-2018 MCASOM curriculum. There were 254 learning objectives, of which 43 (17%) were related to inclusion, diversity, antiracism, and equity (I-DARE). Mirroring the concerns of the students, the findings identified minimal content about antiracism and inclusion. By applying DMAIC principles for quality and process improvement, we aimed to increase the number of taught learning objectives about I-DARE content for the first-year and second-year medical students by 100%, from 43 to 86 objectives, without adversely affecting student satisfaction and true attendance. To address the underlying causes, we launched a virtual, multisite I-DARE medical school course and doubled the number of I-DARE-taught learning objectives from 43 to 107 (149%), compared with the baseline. The program evaluation review revealed that the students were self-reflective and provided a spectrum of experiences regarding the I-DARE course.


Subject(s)
Antiracism , Students, Medical , Humans , Quality Improvement , Schools, Medical , Curriculum
3.
Cancer ; 128(12): 2240-2242, 2022 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35403209
4.
Acad Med ; 95(12): 1791, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234824

Subject(s)
Schools, Medical
5.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 46(7): 417-426, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473966

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals have become an important venue for identifying medical patients with occult suicidality. This article describes the implementation of a quality improvement project at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIHCC) to systematically screen medical/surgical inpatients for suicide risk. METHODS: Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method, questions from the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool were deployed with medical inpatients aged 10 years and older between April 2018 and April 2019. Goals included the development of a training program, policy and procedure review, electronic medical record integration and data collection, and ongoing management and troubleshooting. RESULTS: A total of 4,284 patients were screened for suicide risk with a nurse screening compliance rate of 94.3%. Prevalence data on patients aged 10 years and older revealed an overall screen positive rate of 2.3% (97/4,284), with 3.1% of youth aged 10 to 24 years and 2.2% of adults screening positive. Of the 97 patients who screened positive, 96 were non-acute positive screens. Of the full sample, only 1 patient (0.02%) was deemed acute positive, requiring a 1:1 observer and full safety precautions. CONCLUSION: Universal suicide risk screening was successfully implemented in the NIHCC without incurring a need for additional resources. The intermediate step of a brief suicide safety assessment is a critical part of the workflow, providing guidance for determining appropriate follow-up in a safe and efficient manner that spares limited mental health and hospital resources. Given the increasing suicide rates in the general population, medical venues offer important opportunities for early detection, assessment, and referral.


Subject(s)
Suicide Prevention , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Inpatients , Mass Screening , Quality Improvement , Referral and Consultation
6.
Acad Med ; 95(3): 357-360, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567156

ABSTRACT

Diversity initiatives in U.S. medical education, following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, were geared toward increasing the representation of African Americans-blacks born in the United States whose ancestors suffered under slavery and Jim Crow laws. Over time, blacks and, subsequently, underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMs), became a proxy for African Americans, Puerto Ricans, Mexican Americans, and Native Americans, thus obscuring efforts to identify and recruit specifically African Americans. Moreover, demographic shifts resulting from the recent immigration of black people from Africa and the Caribbean have both expanded the definition of "African American medical students" and shifted the emphasis from those with a history of suffering under U.S. oppression and poverty to anyone who meets a black phenotype.Increasingly, research indicates that African American patients fare better when their physicians share similar historical and social experiences. While all people of color risk discrimination based on their skin color, not all have the lived experience of U.S.-based, systematic, multigenerational discrimination shared by African Americans. In the high-stakes effort to increase URM representation in medical school classes, admissions committees may fail to look beyond the surface of phenotype, thus missing the original intent of diversity initiatives while simultaneously conflating all people of color, disregarding their divergent historical and social experiences. In this Perspective, the authors contend that medical school admissions committees must show greater discernment in their holistic reviews of black applicants if historical wrongs and continued underrepresentation of African Americans in medicine are to be redressed.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Organizational Objectives , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , United States , Young Adult
10.
J Healthc Inf Manag ; 23(1): 39-45, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19181200

ABSTRACT

Clinical decision support tools are important components of the electronic health record and can directly improve patient care outcomes and the performance of healthcare organizations. These tools can be used within order sets, electronic alerts, reference materials that are readily available, reports related to patient data, as well as clinical guidelines that were developed by regulatory agencies The development and use of CDS tools at the point of care offers clinicians the ability to analyze and work with patient data in real-time while making critical decisions. In the future, CDS tools will be important when changes in financial reimbursement related to patient care outcomes become the primary focus for many insurance-related organizations. This financial shift will have a tremendous impact on healthcare organizations bottom line. This article presents outcome data resulting from the implementation of several electronic CDS tools within a community hospital where all physicians enter orders electronically and clinical staff use electronic documentation.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Infection Control , Medical Order Entry Systems , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration
11.
Crit Care Med ; 35(4): 1099-104, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17334250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In critically ill patients, hepatic dysfunction is regarded as a late organ failure associated with poor prognosis. We investigated the incidence and prognostic implications of early hepatic dysfunction (serum bilirubin >2 mg/dL within 48 hrs of admission). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Thirty-two medical, surgical, and mixed intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 38,036 adult patients admitted consecutively over a period of 4 yrs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Excluding patients with preexisting cirrhosis (n = 691; 1.8%) and acute or acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (n = 108, 0.3%), we identified 4,146 patients (10.9%) with early hepatic dysfunction. These patients had different baseline characteristics, longer median intensive care unit stays (5 vs. 3 days; p < .001) and increased hospital mortality (30.4% vs. 16.4%; p < .001). Hepatic dysfunction was also associated with higher observed-to-expected mortality ratios (1.02 vs. 0.91; p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed an independent mortality risk of hepatic dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-2.03; p < .001), which exceeded the impact of all other organ dysfunctions. A case-control study further confirmed these results: Patients with early hepatic dysfunction exhibited significantly increased raw and risk-adjusted mortality compared with control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide strong evidence that early hepatic dysfunction, occurring in 11% of critically ill patients, presents a specific and independent risk factor for poor prognosis.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Critical Illness/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment
12.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(11): 1832-8, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16896849

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predictive of good or poor recovery of health status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 90 days after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective international multicentre study in 19 ICUs participating in the HRQOL substudy of the SAPS 3 project. INTERVENTION: The EuroQol questionnaire (EQ) was administered to discharged ICU patients 90 days after admission. A question to compare present health status with that 3 months before ICU admission (same/better/worse) was added. PATIENTS: Six hundred and eighteen patients who spent >24h in an ICU and survived for 90 days. EQ data and health comparison were available in 559 (90.5%) of them. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients reported their general level of health to be better (33.8%), the same (31.1%), or worse (35.1%) in comparison with baseline. Recovery was considered to be good for answers "better" or "the same". Regression analysis showed that transplantation surgery [odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.63], coronary artery bypass surgery without valvular repair (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.92) and being admitted to the ICU from a ward or other location (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.95) predicted good recovery of health. Predictors of poor recovery (all present at the time of ICU admission) were unplanned ICU admission, hypothermia, serum creatinine level >or=2mg/dl, pH

Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Health Status , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Argentina , Europe , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
13.
Circ Res ; 98(5): 590-2, 2006 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16484614

ABSTRACT

Understanding the mechanisms by which estrogens affect cardiovascular disease risk, including the role of variation in the gene for estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), may be key to new treatment strategies. We investigated whether the CC genotype at ESR1 c.454-397T>C is associated with increased risk among men. Study of more than 7000 whites in 5 cohorts from 4 countries provided evidence that genotype CC, present in roughly 20% of individuals, is a risk factor for nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio=1.44; P<0.0001), after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. After exclusion of younger subjects from 2 cohorts, because of age interaction, the odds ratio increased (to 1.63).


Subject(s)
Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/genetics , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
14.
Intensive Care Med ; 31(10): 1345-55, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16132892

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ICU admission data (recorded within +/-1 h) were used, describing: prior chronic conditions and diseases; circumstances related to and physiologic derangement at ICU admission. Selection of variables for inclusion into the model used different complementary strategies. For cross-validation, the model-building procedure was run five times, using randomly selected four fifths of the sample as a development- and the remaining fifth as validation-set. Logistic regression methods were then used to reduce complexity of the model. Final estimates of regression coefficients were determined by use of multilevel logistic regression. Variables selection and weighting were further checked by bootstraping (at patient level and at ICU level). Twenty variables were selected for the final model, which exhibited good discrimination (aROC curve 0.848), without major differences across patient typologies. Calibration was also satisfactory (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test H=10.56, p=0.39, C=14.29, p=0.16). Customized equations for major areas of the world were computed and demonstrate a good overall goodness-of-fit. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 admission score is able to predict vital status at hospital discharge with use of data recorded at ICU admission. Furthermore, SAPS 3 conceptually dissociates evaluation of the individual patient from evaluation of the ICU and thus allows them to be assessed at their respective reference levels.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Risk
15.
Intensive Care Med ; 31(10): 1336-44, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16132893

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0-3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 study was able to provide a high-quality multinational database, reflecting heterogeneity of current ICU case-mix and typology. The poor performance of SAPS II in this cohort underscores the need for development of a new risk adjustment system for critically ill patients.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
16.
J Trauma ; 57(2): 375-80, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15345988

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test (a) the prognostic performance of TRISS and SAPS II scoring systems in a large sample of trauma patients admitted to Austrian ICUs, and (b) the hypothesis that the prognostic performance of TRISS could be improved by adding SAPS II. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study comprising 5,538 trauma patients out of 35,637 patients admitted to 31 ICUs in Austria over a 4-year period. RESULTS: Separately, TRISS and SAPS II showed lack of calibration in the cohort of trauma patients. The database was then split into two equal samples, development and validation. Using the development sample, a new scoring system was developed, with vital status at hospital discharge as the dependent variable and TRISS and SAPS II as independent variables. The prognostic performance of the new TRISS-SAPS system was then assessed in the validation cohort: Both, discrimination (as shown by area under the ROC curve), and calibration (using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics) was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: We improved risk adjustment in critically ill trauma patients by combining TRISS and SAPS II. This new scoring system might aid in evaluating and comparing specialized trauma ICUs.


Subject(s)
APACHE , Critical Illness , Multiple Trauma , Risk Adjustment/methods , Trauma Severity Indices , Adult , Aged , Austria/epidemiology , Calibration , Comorbidity , Critical Illness/classification , Critical Illness/mortality , Discriminant Analysis , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , ROC Curve , Risk Adjustment/standards , Survival Analysis
17.
Intensive Care Med ; 30(8): 1586-93, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14991099

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The organizational structure of health care facilities has been shown to affect outcome in critically ill patients. We evaluated the association between structures, treatments and outcomes in a large cohort of critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 26,186 patients consecutively admitted to 31 intensive care units (ICUs) in Austria from January 1998 through December 2000. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The ICUs were divided into three groups according to the size and function of the hospital: community hospitals and specialized trauma centers (group A); central referral hospitals (group B); and teaching hospitals (group C). Group C patients exhibited a significantly higher risk-adjusted mortality (O/E ratio). Although severity of illness at admission in groups B and C was similar, group C patients received significantly more invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions throughout their ICU stay: For 7 of 10 invasive interventions identified, odds ratios for group C vs group B patients were significantly increased, even after adjustment for age, gender, severity of illness and reason for admission (odds ratios 1.2-13.1; all 95% CIs >1). Risk-adjusted multivariate analysis confirmed that six of these invasive interventions were independently associated with mortality. Furthermore, nurse-to-patient ratios did not differ between groups, leading to a significantly increased nursing workload in group C ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Several invasive interventions were independently associated with increased mortality. Our results provide strong evidence that this association was responsible in part for the increased risk-adjusted mortality in group C patients.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Austria , Benchmarking , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Statistics, Nonparametric
18.
J Aging Phys Act ; 12(4): 497-510, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15851822

ABSTRACT

Where strength training has been used in conjunction with functional-task training in older people, not only have there been improvements in leg strength but also improved function has been measured (e.g., Skelton & McLaughlin, 1996). Many studies use participants from care homes rather than community dwellers. We investigated changes in leg power, balance, and functional mobility in community-dwelling sedentary men and women over 70 years of age (n = 6 for training group [TR]; n = 10 for control group [CN]). Progressive training took place over 24 weeks using seated and nonseated exercise. For TR, leg power increased 40%, from 108 +/- 40 to 141 +/- 53 W (p < .01); dynamic balance increased 48%, from 22.3 +/- 7.9 to 33.1 +/- 6.1 cm (p < .01; functional reach); and functional mobility increased 12%, from 7.46 +/- 1.32 to 6.54 +/- 1.41 s (p < .05; timed walk). CN showed no significant change. In conclusion, a community-based exercise program led to large improvements in leg-extensor power, dynamic balance, and functional mobility.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Aged/physiology , Leg/physiology , Physical Education and Training/methods , Postural Balance/physiology , Walking/physiology , Body Size/physiology , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Crit Care Med ; 31(7): 1901-7, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12847381

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender-related differences exist in the provided level of care and outcome in a large cohort of critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study with data collection from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2000. SETTING: Thirty-one intensive care units in Austria. PATIENTS: A total of 25,998 adult patients, consecutively admitted to 31 intensive care units in Austria. INTERVENTIONS: We assessed severity of illness, level of provided care, and vital status at hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 25,998 patients, 58.3% were male and 41.7% were female. Hospital mortality rate was slightly higher in women (18.1%) than in men (17.2%), but severity of illness-adjusted mortality rate was not different. Men received an overall increased level of care and had a significantly higher probability of receiving invasive procedures, such as mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.28), single vasoactive medication (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24), multiple vasoactive medication (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.28), intravenous replacement of large fluid losses (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20), central venous catheter (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), peripheral arterial catheter (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22), pulmonary artery catheter (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34-1.62), renal replacement therapy (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.42), and intracranial pressure measurement (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.53). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of critically ill patients, no differences in severity of illness-adjusted mortality rate between men and women were found. Despite a higher severity of illness in women, men received an increased level of care and underwent more invasive procedures. This different therapeutic approach in men did not translate into a better outcome.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Critical Illness/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Prejudice , Quality Assurance, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Austria , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Life Support Care/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...