Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we analyzed the impact of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity in a tertiary care medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the productivity of two diagnostic CT scanners during the periods January 1 to August 31, 1999 (when both scanners had single-slice CT capability) and January 1 to August 31, 2000 (when one of these scanners was replaced with a multislice CT scanner). The scanners were used primarily for outpatients during the day shift and for inpatients during the evening shift; the demand for CT services was stable. For this analysis, we queried the hospital's radiology information system and identified the number of CT examinations performed during the two analysis periods. We also determined the examination mix, including proportion of enhanced and unenhanced examinations and the anatomic region examined, to ensure comparable patient populations. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of CT studies performed on the two scanners increased by 1772 (13.1%) from 13,548 (before multislice CT) to 15,320 (when multislice CT was available). The number of examinations enhanced with contrast media increased from 52% to 65%. Between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., the number of CT examinations was similar on the single-slice scanners in the two periods (p > 0.05). However, in the period when multislice CT was available, the number of studies performed on the multislice scanner (5919) was 51.9% higher than those performed using the single-slice scanner (3896) (p < 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Using a multislice CT scanner leads to an increase in CT productivity, even though multislice studies are performed using more complicated protocols than are used on a single-slice CT scanner.

Technical cost of CT examinations.

PURPOSE: To measure the technical cost of different categories of computed tomographic (CT) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For fiscal year 1997, the technical costs of performing CT examinations in a tertiary care academic medical center were measured. Costs were divided into labor and nonlabor categories. Indirect departmental costs were fully allocated according to activity-based methods. Hospital overhead costs were set at 85% of the departmental budget. Physician costs, including those related to image interpretation were not included. The technical cost of CT was determined on a per technical relative value unit (RVU) basis and on a per examination basis. For the latter, the technical cost of nonenhanced CT, contrast material-enhanced diagnostic CT, and interventional CT procedures were determined. RESULTS: In fiscal year 1997, 45,599 examinations (22,158 [48.6%] abdominal and/or pelvic, 12,115 [26.6%] head and neck, 6,572 [14.4%] thoracic, 1,593 [3.5%] interventional, and 3,161 [6.9%] other) were performed with five CT scanners for a technical RVU output of 254,461. Of 45,599 examinations, 31,007 (68%) were performed with intravenously administered contrast medium. Overall labor costs were $1,744,653, and nonlabor costs were $2,912,282. The cost of a hypothetical CT examination with a mean technical RVU of 5.58 was $189. The overall cost per examination was $150 for nonenhanced CT, $237 for contrast-enhanced CT, and $462 for interventional CT. CONCLUSION: Although CT is based on sophisticated technology, the mean technical cost of a diagnostic CT examination is less than $200.

Technical cost of radiologic examinations: analysis across imaging modalities.

PURPOSE: To determine the individual technical costs of general diagnostic radiographic, ultrasonographic (US), computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and scintigraphic examinations and interventional radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiology Cost and Productivity Benchmarking Study method of the University HealthSystem Consortium, a cooperative group of academic medical centers, was modified and extended to the six imaging modalities in a tertiary care academic setting. Hospital billing and cost records were analyzed for fiscal year 1996. Costs were divided into labor and nonlabor categories and were allocated to individual imaging modalities on the basis of resources consumed. Physician cost and hospital overhead were not included. Unit costs were analyzed per technical relative value unit (RVU) and per examination. RESULTS: The costs per technical RVU for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $65. 06, $28.74, $20.95, $17.69, $42.19, and $89.03, respectively. The technical costs per examination for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $41.92, $50.28, $112.32, $266.96, $196.88, and $692.60, respectively. CONCLUSION: The method of unit cost analysis for individual imaging modalities was successfully tested in a tertiary care setting. The method should be adopted to allow cost comparison across many institutions, which will permit the promotion of best practices.