CONSTIPATION SCORING SYSTEM VALIDATED FOR THE PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE (ÍNDICE DE GRAVIDADE DA CONSTIPAÇÃO INTESTINAL): IS IT RELIABLE IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF INTESTINAL CHRONIC CONSTIPATION IN OUR POPULATION?

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of valid and specific tools to measure chronic constipation severity in Brazil. AIMS: To validate the Constipation Scoring System for Brazilian spoken Portuguese. METHODS: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation itself (reliability and convergent and divergent validation). Translation: definitive version from the original version's translation and evaluation by specialists. Cultural adaptation: score content analysis of the definitive version, as an interview to patients. Interobserver reliability: application by two researchers on the same day. Intraobserver reliability: same researcher at different times, in a 7-day interval. Divergent validation: non-constipated volunteers. Convergent validation: two groups, good response to clinical treatment and refractory to treatment. RESULTS: Cultural adaptation: 81 patients, 89% female, with mean age of 55 and seven years of schooling, and overall content validity index was 96.5%. Inter and intraobserver reliability analysis: 60 patients, 86.7% female, mean age of 56 and six years of schooling, and the respective intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.991 and 0.987, p<0.001. Divergent validation: 40 volunteers, 25 male, mean age of 49 years, and the mean global score was 2. Convergent validation of patients with good response to clinical treatment: 47 patients, 39 female, mean age of 60 and six years of schooling, and the pre- and post-treatment scores were 19 and 8, respectively (p<0.001). Convergent validation of refractory to clinical treatment patients: 75 patients, 70 female, mean age of 53 and seven years of schooling, and the global average score was 22. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Scoring System (Índice de Gravidade da Constipação Intestinal) validated for the Brazilian population is a reliable instrument for measuring the severity of intestinal chronic constipation.

Constipation scoring system validated for the portuguese language (índice de gravidade da constipação intestinal): is it reliable in assessing the severity of intestinal chronic constipation in our population? / O instrumento constipation scoring system validado para a língua portuguesa (índice de gravidade da constipação intestinal): é confiável na avaliação da gravidade da constipação intestinal crônica em nossa população?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There is a lack of valid and specific tools to measure chronic constipation severity in Brazil. AIMS: To validate the Constipation Scoring System for Brazilian spoken Portuguese. METHODS: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation itself (reliability and convergent and divergent validation). Translation: definitive version from the original version's translation and evaluation by specialists. Cultural adaptation: score content analysis of the definitive version, as an interview to patients. Interobserver reliability: application by two researchers on the same day. Intraobserver reliability: same researcher at different times, in a 7-day interval. Divergent validation: non-constipated volunteers. Convergent validation: two groups, good response to clinical treatment and refractory to treatment. RESULTS: Cultural adaptation: 81 patients, 89% female, with mean age of 55 and seven years of schooling, and overall content validity index was 96.5%. Inter and intraobserver reliability analysis: 60 patients, 86.7% female, mean age of 56 and six years of schooling, and the respective intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.991 and 0.987, p<0.001. Divergent validation: 40 volunteers, 25 male, mean age of 49 years, and the mean global score was 2. Convergent validation of patients with good response to clinical treatment: 47 patients, 39 female, mean age of 60 and six years of schooling, and the pre- and post-treatment scores were 19 and 8, respectively (p<0.001). Convergent validation of refractory to clinical treatment patients: 75 patients, 70 female, mean age of 53 and seven years of schooling, and the global average score was 22. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Scoring System (Índice de Gravidade da Constipação Intestinal) validated for the Brazilian population is a reliable instrument for measuring the severity of intestinal chronic constipation.

RESUMO RACIONAL: No Brasil há escassez de instrumentos específicos e validados para a avaliação da gravidade da constipação intestinal crônica. OBJETIVOS: Validar o instrumento Constipation Scoring System para pacientes com constipação crônica. MÉTODOS: Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação propriamente dita. Tradução: versão definitiva a partir de traduções do original avaliadas por especialistas. Adaptação cultural: avaliação do conteúdo por entrevista a pacientes. Confiabilidade interobservadores: entrevista por dois pesquisadores no mesmo dia. Confiabilidade intraobservador: duas entrevistas pelo mesmo pesquisador (intervalo de 7 dias). Validação divergente: voluntários não constipados. Validação convergente: dois grupos, boa resposta e refratários ao tratamento clínico. RESULTADOS: Adaptação cultural: 81 pacientes, sendo 89% do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 55 anos e 7 anos de escolaridade. O índice de validade de conteúdo global foi de 96,5%. Confiabilidade interobservadores e intraobservador: 60 pacientes, sendo 86,7% do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 56 anos e 6 anos de escolaridade. O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse foi de 0,991 e 0,987 (p<0,001), respectivamente. Validação divergente: 40 voluntários, sendo 62,5% do sexo masculino, com média de idade de 49 anos e pontuação média: 0. Validação convergente dos pacientes com boa resposta do tratamento clínico: 47 pacientes, sendo 83% do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 60 anos e 6 anos de escolaridade. Os índices pré e pós-tratamento foram 19 e 8 (p<0,001), respectivamente. Validação convergente dos pacientes refratários ao tratamento clínico: 75 pacientes sendo 93% do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 53 anos e 7 anos escolaridade. A pontuação média foi 22. CONCLUSÕES: O Constipation Scoring System validado para população brasileira (Índice de Gravidade da Constipação Intestinal), é instrumento confiável para a aferição da gravidade da constipação intestinal crônica.

Are Obese Patients at an Increased Risk of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Compared to Non-obese Patients?

PURPOSE: Factors associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure such as chronic cough, morbid obesity, and constipation may be related to pelvic floor dysfunction. In this study, we compared anorectal manometry values and clinical data of class II and III morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery with that of non-obese patients. METHODS: We performed a case-matched study between obese patients referred to bariatric surgery and non-obese patients without anorectal complaints. The groups were matched by age and gender. Men and nulliparous women with no history of abdominal or anorectal surgery were included in the study. Anorectal manometry was performed by the stationary technique, and clinical evaluation was based on validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean age was 44.8 ± 12.5 years (mean ± SD) in the obese group and 44.1 ± 11.8 years in the non-obese group (p = 0.829). In the obese group, 65.4% of patients had some degree of fecal incontinence. Mean squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese than in non-obese patients (155.6 ± 64.1 vs. 210.1 ± 75.9 mmHg, p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference regarding mean rest pressure in obese patients compared to non-obese ones (63.7 ± 23.1 vs. 74.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.051). There were no significant differences in anorectal manometry values between continent and incontinent obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of fecal incontinence among obese patients was high regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. Anal squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese patients compared to non-obese controls.

[Prevalence of self-reported constipation in adults from the general population]. / Prevalência de constipação intestinal autorreferida em adultos da população geral.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of self-reported constipation and associated factors in the general population of a Brazilian city. METHOD: Secondary analysis of an epidemiological study, population-based, cross-sectional study, about bowel habits of Brazilian population. A total of 2,162 individuals were interviewed using two instruments: sociodemographic data and the adapted and validated Brazilian version of the "Bowel Function in the Community" tool. RESULTS: There was a prevalence of 25.2% for the self-reported constipation, 37.2% among women and 10.2% among men. Stroke and old age were associated with constipation in the three statistical models used. CONCLUSION: The prevalence found showed to be similar to the findings in the literature, although some associated factors obtained here have never been investigated.

Prevalence of self-reported constipation in adults from the general population / Prevalencia de constipación autorreferido en adultos de la población general / Prevalência de constipação intestinal autorreferida em adultos da população geral

OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of self-reported constipation and associated factors in the general population of a Brazilian city. METHOD Secondary analysis of an epidemiological study, population-based, cross-sectional study, about bowel habits of Brazilian population. A total of 2,162 individuals were interviewed using two instruments: sociodemographic data and the adapted and validated Brazilian version of the "Bowel Function in the Community" tool. RESULTS There was a prevalence of 25.2% for the self-reported constipation, 37.2% among women and 10.2% among men. Stroke and old age were associated with constipation in the three statistical models used. CONCLUSION The prevalence found showed to be similar to the findings in the literature, although some associated factors obtained here have never been investigated. .

OBJETIVO Estimar la prevalencia de estreñimiento autorreferido y los factores asociados en la población general de una ciudad brasileña. MÉTODO Análisis secundario de un estudio epidemiológico, de base poblacional y transversal, acerca del hábito intestinal en la población brasileña. Fueron entrevistados 2.162 individuos utilizándose dos instrumentos: datos sociodemográficos y hábito intestinal en la población. RESULTADOS Se logró prevalencia del 25,2% para el estreñimiento autorreferido, siendo el 37,2% para mujeres y el 10,2% entre los hombres. Accidente Vascular Encefálico y edad avanzada presentaron asociación con constipación en los tres modelos estadísticos utilizados. CONCLUSIÓN La prevalencia encontrada se mostró similar a los hallazgos de la literatura internacional, aunque algunos factores asociados aquí obtenidos nunca se hayan investigado. .

OBJETIVO Estimar a prevalência de constipação intestinal autorreferida e os fatores associados na população geral de uma cidade brasileira. MÉTODO Análise secundária de um estudo epidemiológico, de base populacional e transversal, sobre o hábito intestinal na população brasileira. Foram entrevistados 2.162 indivíduos utilizando-se dois instrumentos: dados sociodemográficos e hábito intestinal na população. RESULTADOS Obteve-se prevalência de 25,2% para a constipação autorreferida, sendo 37,2% para mulheres e 10,2% entre homens. Acidente Vascular Encefálico e idade avançada apresentaram associação com constipação nos três modelos estatísticos utilizados. CONCLUSÃO A prevalência encontrada mostrou-se similar aos achados na literatura internacional, embora alguns fatores associados aqui obtidos nunca tenham sido investigados. .

Self-reported fecal incontinence in a community-dwelling, urban population in southern Brazil.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of self-reported fecal incontinence (FI) in a sample of community-dwelling adults residing in an urban area of southern Brazil. The study also aimed to determine the demographic and clinical factors associated with FI. DESIGN: This secondary data analysis used an exploratory, descriptive, and cross-sectional design to guide data collection and analysis. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Two thousand one hundred sixty-two adults, including 1203 women (55.6%) and 979 men with a mean age of 40.6 years, were randomly selected from 390 census tracts in the city of Londrina (Paraná, Brazil) using a stratified cluster sampling design. METHODS: Subjects were interviewed; the instrument was the culturally adapted and validated Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Bowel Function in the Community. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson chi-square test, the Fisher exact test, and forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of FI was 3.6% (n= 77; women 4%; men 3%); 70.1% (54/77) of the participants with FI reported liquid stool incontinence. Predictors of FI were aged between 40 and 60 years, anal fissure, previous colorectal or urogynecologic surgery, neurological diseases, cerebral vascular accident, and diarrhea or constipation. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed prevalence rates smaller than those reported in the Brazilian and international literature. The study broadens the knowledge on the epidemiology of FI in Brazil and the world. These results may be used to guide the implementation of public health policies for the prevention and early diagnosis of FI.

Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence.

OBJECTIVE: Perineal prostatectomy has been proposed as a less invasive and safe procedure, but the risk of anal incontinence has been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perineal access on anal continence mechanisms after perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: From August 2008 to May 2009, twenty three patients underwent perineal prostatectomy. These patients were evaluated before surgery and eight months postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 65 (range, 54-72) years, and the mean prostate weight was 34.5 (range, 24-54) grams. Gleason scores ranged from 6-7, and the mean Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score (mean±standard deviation) values were 0.9±1.9 and 0.7±1.2 (p>0.05) before and after surgery, respectively. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score did not change significantly after surgery. The mean values for anal manometric parameters before and after surgery were, respectively: Resting Pressures of 64±23 mmHg and 65±17 mmHg (p = 0.763), Maximum Squeezing Pressures of 130±41 mmHg and 117±40 mmHg (p = 0.259), High Pressure Zones of 3.0±0.9 cm and 2.7±0.8 cm(p = 0.398), Rectal Sensory Thresholds of 76±25 ml and 71±35 ml (p = 0.539), Maximum Tolerated Rectal Volumes of 157±48 ml and 156±56ml (p = 0.836), and Sphincter Asymmetry Indexes 22.4±9% and 14.4±5% (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the sphincter symmetry index after perineal prostatectomy. With the exception of the sphincter asymmetry index, perineal prostatectomy did not affect anal continence parameters.

Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence

OBJECTIVE: Perineal prostatectomy has been proposed as a less invasive and safe procedure, but the risk of anal incontinence has been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perineal access on anal continence mechanisms after perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: From August 2008 to May 2009, twenty three patients underwent perineal prostatectomy. These patients were evaluated before surgery and eight months postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 65 (range, 54-72) years, and the mean prostate weight was 34.5 (range, 24-54) grams. Gleason scores ranged from 6-7, and the mean Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score (mean±;standard deviation) values were 0.9±1.9 and 0.7±1.2 (p.0.05) before and after surgery, respectively. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score did not change significantly after surgery. The mean values for anal manometric parameters before and after surgery were, respectively: Resting Pressures of 64±23 mmHg and 65±17 mmHg (p = 0.763), Maximum Squeezing Pressures of 130±41 mmHg and 117±40 mmHg (p = 0.259), High Pressure Zones of 3.0±0.9 cm and 2.7±0.8 cm(p = 0.398), Rectal Sensory Thresholds of 76±25 mland71±35 ml (p = 0.539), Maximum Tolerated Rectal Volumes of 157±48 ml and 156±56ml (p = 0.836), and Sphincter Asymmetry Indexes 22.4±9 percent and 14.4±5 percent (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the sphincter symmetry index after perineal prostatectomy. With the exception of the sphincter asymmetry index, perineal prostatectomy did not affect anal continence parameters.

Novos tratamentos para a incontinência anal: injeção de silicone melhora a qualidade de vida em 35 pacientes incontinentes / New treatment modality of anal incontinence: trans-sphincteric silicone injection improved quality of life in 35 incontinent patients

Demonstrar através do índice de incontinência e de um instrumento de qualidade de vida, o benefício da utilização do silicone como substância de preenchimento para o tratamento da incontinência anal. 35 pacientes incontinentes foram avaliados através do índice de incontinência (Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System-CCFSS) e instrumento de qualidade de vida (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life-FIQL), antes e após injeção ambulatorial trans-esfincteriana de silicone. Os critérios de inclusão foram: incontinência anal associada a defeito simples do esfíncter interno ou associado a pequeno defeito do esfíncter externo em quadrante anterior. A escala de qualidade de vida avaliada inclui quatro domínios: depressão, estilo de vida, comportamento e constrangimento. Após 3 meses de tratamento, todos os pacientes foram reavaliados através do índice de incontinência e instrumento de qualidade de vida. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente através do programa GraphPd Instat. 28 mulheres e 7 homens com idade média de 60,3 (19-80) anos foram submetidos a injeção de silicone para o tratamento de incontinência anal. O índice médio de incontinência, antes e após a injeção, foi de 11,3 e 4,3 (p<0.001). Em relação às alterações na escala de qualidade de vida, notamos significantes alterações em todos os domínios estudados antes e após a injeção: (1) estilo de vida p<0,0001;(2)comportamento p<0,0001;(3) depressão p<0,0001; (4) constrangimento p<0,0001. Em casos selecionados, a injeção trans-esfincteriana de silicone proporciona uma melhora do quadro de incontinência anal, observada pela mudança significativa dos parâmetros do índice de incontinência e instrumento de qualidade de vida.

To evaluate clinical impact and benefits of trans-sphincteric injection of silicone in patients with anal incontinence using validated incontinence score and quality of life scale. 35 incontinent patients related to internal and external anal sphincter defects were selected for ambulatorial trans-sphincteric silicone injection. Inclusion criteria were: anal incontinence associated or not to internal sphincter defects and/ or one quadrant external sphincter defects. All patients were submitted to clinical evaluation before and after injections including an incontinence scoring system (Cleveland Clinic Florida) and quality of life scale (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life) with 4 domains: depression, self-perception, embarrassment and lifestyle. Results: 28 female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 60.3(19-80) years underwent ambulatorial trans-sphincteric injection of silicone. Mean incontinence score improved significantly after injection: 11.3 to 4.3 (p<0.001). All domains in the quality of life scale demonstrated significant improvement after injection (p<0.0001). Conclusion: In selected cases, trans-sphincteric silicone injection is a valuable option for the treatment of anal incontinence, improving significantly patient's quality of life.

Rectal procidentia treatment by perineal rectosigmoidectomy combined with levator ani repair.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Perineal rectosigmoidectomy has gained acceptance as a valid alternative to treat rectal procidentia with the advantage of decreased surgical risk, shorter recovery time, and lower complication rates when compared to abdominal approaches, although controversies still exist about its recurrence rates and functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy combined with repair of the levator ani muscles to treat rectal procidentia. METHODOLOGY: Forty-four patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty for rectal procidentia between 1985 and 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were 41 women and 3 men with mean age of 76 (57 to 96) years. Mean duration of symptoms was 29.2 (1 to 40) months. Mean length of prolapsed rectum was 8.3cm and the average size of the resected segment was 21.2cm. The complication rate was 9.1% and there was no mortality associated with this procedure. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. During a minimum period of follow-up of 24 months (24-120) with a mean of 49 months, the recurrence rate was 7.1% (two patients presented recurrence of procidentia and another prolapse of the rectal mucosa). Anal continence improved in 36 (85.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal rectosigmoidectomy combined with levatorplasty is a safe procedure associated with a relatively low morbidity rate, satisfactory functional results, and an acceptably low recurrence rate.

Avaliação da qualidade de vida na incontinência anal: validação do questionário FIQL (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life) / Evaluation of quality of life in anal incontinence: validation of the questionnaire FIQL (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life)

RACIONAL: A incontinência anal acarreta incapacitação física e psicológica, determinando impacto na qualidade de vida. Para quantificar esse impacto em nosso meio, não existem instrumentos específicos validados. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a qualidade de vida na incontinência anal, através da validação do questionário "Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life" (FIQL), que é composto por 29 questões distribuídas em 4 domínios: estilo de vida, comportamento, depressão e constrangimento, sua escala de pontuação varia de 1 a 4 com exceção das questões 1 e 4 que variam de 1 a 5 e 1 a 6, respectivamente. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Após tradução e adaptação cultural, estudou-se a validação do instrumento através das propriedades de medida de reprodutibilidade e validade. Para a avaliação da reprodutibilidade aplicou-se o questionário em 50 pacientes com incontinência anal por dois examinadores, sendo reaplicado por um dos examinadores após período de 7 a 10 dias. A validade construtiva foi testada através da comparação do FIQL e o SF-36, questionário genérico de qualidade de vida e entre o FIQL e um índice de incontinência anal. O índice de incontinência anal utilizado foi o de Jorge-Wexner, que varia de 0 (continência perfeita) a 20 (incontinência total). A validade discriminativa foi avaliada através da aplicação do FIQL em dois grupos controle: indivíduos voluntários hígidos e portadores de constipação intestinal. RESULTADOS: Verificou-se que o FIQL apresentou correlação significativa com outros instrumentos (SF-36 e índice de incontinência) e que a qualidade de vida no portador de incontinência anal está comprometida em todos os domínios: estilo de vida: 2,4 comportamento: 2,0, depressão: 2,5 e constrangimento: 1,9, quando comparado com os indivíduos voluntários hígidos (3,9, 3,9, 4,1 e 4,0), e pacientes com constipação intestinal (3,7, 3,8, 3,6 e 3,8), respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: O FIQL é útil para a avaliação da qualidade de vida na incontinência anal em nossa população.

[Evaluation of quality of life in anal incontinence: validation of the questionnaire FIQL (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life)]. / Avaliação da qualidade de vida na incontinência anal: validação do questionário FIQL (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life).

BACKGROUND: Anal incontinence causes physical and psychological incapacity, determining impact on quality of life. However, there are no specific tools to quantify this impact in our population. AIM: The evaluation of quality of life in anal incontinence, through validation of the FIQL ("Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale"). FIQL is a questionnaire composed of 29 questions, grouped into four domains: lifestyle, behavior, depression and embarrassment. For each question, the scale ranges from 1 to 4, except questions 1 and 4, which ranges from 1-5 and 1-6, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHOD: FIQL scale underwent both translation and cultural adaptation processes, giving rise to a final Portuguese version. This version was then used in a validation study to test measurement properties (reproducibility and validity). The reproducibility was tested through application of FIQL questionnaire by two observers in 50 patients with anal incontinence. After a period of 7 to 10 days, the questionnaire was applied again by one of the observers. The constructive validity was assessed by correlating the FIQL questionnaire results with both, a generic questionnaire for quality of life (SF-36) and the Jorge-Wexner incontinence score results. The discriminative validity was evaluated comparing the results of the FIQL to incontinence group with two other groups: healthy volunteers and patient with chronic idiopathic constipation. RESULTS: The correlation among results domains of FIQL questionnaire and results of short form-36 and the incontinence score were statistically significant. The quality of life is impaired in all of domains of FIQL for incontinent patients: lifestyle: 2.4 behaviour: 2.0, depression: 2.5 and embarrassment: 1.9, when compared to healthy volunteers (3.9, 3.9, 4.1 and 4.0), and patients with chronic constipation (3.7, 3.8, 3.6 and 3.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: The FIQL questionnaire is effective and reproducible in its measuring properties, and it can be useful as an instrument to assess quality of life in anal incontinence in our population.

Prevalência da incontinencia anal no diabético: estudo epidemiológico com base na populaçäo atendida em regime ambulatorial no Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Säo Paulo / Prevalence of fecal incontinence in the diabetic an epidemiological study in those diabetics attended as outpatients at the \"Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo\"

O objetivo deste trabalho foi o estudo da prevalencia da incontinencia anal na populacao de diabeticos atendidos em regime ambulatorial no Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo. O metodo utilizado foi o de entrevista verbal e individual. Utilizou-se a classificacao do diabetes melito da Organizacao Mundial de Saude de 1985. Foram coletados dados referentes a sexo, idade, cor, tipo e duracao do diabetes melito, incontinencia anal, neuropatia periferica, habito intestinal (normal, constipacao e diarreia), urgencia para evacuar...

Tempo de trânsito colônico total e segmentar: análise crítica dos métodos e estudos em indivíduos normais com marcadores radiopacos / Colonic total and segmental transit times: critical analysis for study and methods in normal person with radiopaque makes

A definiçäo de funçäo colônica normal é essencial para o entendimento dos distúrbios funcionais do cólon, particularmente a obstipaçäo, e de seu planejamento terapêutico com bases mais objetivas. O estudo do tempo de trânsito colónico com marcadores radiopacos permite näo apenas a avaliaçäo do tempo de trânsito colônico total (TTT), como também o segmentar, avaliando-se independentemente a motilidade do cólon direito (TTD), cólon esquerdo (TTE) e reto-sigmoide (TTRS). Säo estudados 20 voluntários, com hábito intestinal normal, em distribuiçäo eqüitativa de sexo, com dieta habitual calculada entre 22 e 35 g/dia de fibras. As médias dos resultados obtidos foram: sexo masculino: TTT 32,5 h; TTD = 8,3 h; TTE = 15,5 h e TTRS = 8,9 h. No sexo feminino: TTT = 40,9 h; TTD = 15,7 h; TTE = 12,8 h e TTRS = 12,6 h. Na avaliaçäo global dos dois grupos, observaram-se TTT = 36,2 h; TTD = 12,0 h; TTE = 14,2 h e TTRS = 10,7 h. O método mostrou ser de fácil realizaçäo e com resultados, na populaçäo estudada, comparáveis aos relatados em outros países, caracterizando um grupo-controle para futuros estudos em nosso meio

Síndrome de Budd-Chiari: apresentaçäo de um caso

Os autores apresentam um caso de síndrome de Budd-Chiari e suas correlaçöes clínicas, radiológicas e patológicas