ABSTRACT
Background: Unicystic ameloblastoma is a rare, benign, locally invasive odontogenic neoplasm of young age that shows clinical, radiographic, or gross features of an odontogenic cyst but histologically shows typical ameloblastomatous epithelium lining part of the cyst cavity, with or without luminal and/or mural tumor growth. Aim: To report a case of an asymptomatic unicystic ameloblastoma in a 12-year-old child, along with its management and follow-up. Case description: A 12-year-old boy presented with swelling with respect to the left body of the mandible. The orthopantomogram (OPG) and computed tomography scan revealed a large unilocular radiolucency in the left mandible associated with the primary second mandibular molar. Complete enucleation of the cyst and extraction of the associated primary teeth and underlying permanent teeth were done under general anesthesia. Carnoy's solution was applied in the bone cavity for 3 minutes with cotton applicators. Postoperative healing was uneventful. Prosthetic rehabilitation was done during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Unicystic ameloblastoma is rarely seen in younger children, so a pediatric dentist must be cautious while diagnosing an intraoral swelling. Timely intervention and conservative surgical treatment, along with a proper follow-up, improved the treatment outcome and prevented potential complications in the future. Clinical significance: This report highlights the salient features of unicystic ameloblastoma to be able to accurately diagnose and manage the lesion. How to cite this article: Peter J, Emmatty TB, Jose B, et al. Unicystic Ameloblastoma Associated with Primary Mandibular Second Molar: A Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-3):S335-S338.
ABSTRACT
Apert syndrome is a developmental malformation characterised by craniosynostosis (premature fusion of cranial sutures), midface hypoplasia, and syndactyly of hands and feet. Early synostosis of the coronal suture, cranial base, as well as agenesis of the sagittal suture, result in characteristic appearance and dental features like maxillary transverse and sagittal hypoplasia with concomitant dental crowding, a pseudo-cleft palate, and skeletal and dental anterior open bite. In this report, we discuss a case of Apert syndrome, with special emphasis on craniofacial characteristics, a multidisciplinary approach to its treatment, and the dentist's role in management.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Formocresol remains to be the preferred medicament in pulpotomy, despite the concerns regarding tissue devitalization and systemic toxicity. Several materials were used as alternatives, but none proved significantly advantageous. Of recent, calcium phosphate cement (CPC) has been projected as an ideal pulpotomy material considering its tissue compatibility and dentinogenic properties. This study explores the suitability of a CPC formulation for pulpotomy, in comparison with formocresol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comparative case study included 10 children (8-12 age group) having a pair of non-carious primary canines (both maxillary and mandibular) posted for extraction. Pulpotomy was performed with CPC in the right canines and formocresol in the left and sealed with IRM ® (Dentsply). The teeth were extracted at 70 ± 5 days and sectioned and stained for the histopathological evaluation. Parameters such as pulpal inflammation, tissue reaction to material, dentine bridge formation, location of dentine bridge, quality of dentine formation in bridge, and connective tissue in bridge etc. were evaluated. RESULTS: The histological assessment after 70 days showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the parameters. However, CPC gave more favorable results in pulpal inflammation, with a lower score of 1.6 against 2.6 for formocresol. CPC samples showed better formation of dentine bridge in quantity and quality. The mean scores for CPC for the extent of dentine bridge formation, quality of dentine bridge and connective tissue in the bridge, were 2.0, 1.4, and 1.2 respectively, whereas the corresponding values for formocresol were 0.8, 0.2, and 1.0. CONCLUSION: CPC is more compatible to pulp tissues than formocresol and it shows good healing potential. CPC is capable of inducing dentine formation without an area of necrosis.
