Comparative evaluation of toric intraocular lens alignment and visual quality with image-guided surgery and conventional three-step manual marking.

PURPOSE: To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment assisted by image-guided surgery or manual marking methods and its impact on visual quality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective comparative study enrolled 80 eyes with cataract and astigmatism ≥1.5 D to undergo phacoemulsification with toric IOL alignment by manual marking method using bubble marker (group I, n=40) or Callisto eye and Z align (group II, n=40). Postoperatively, accuracy of alignment and visual quality was assessed with a ray tracing aberrometer. Primary outcome measure was deviation from the target axis of implantation. Secondary outcome measures were visual quality and acuity. Follow-up was performed on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 30. RESULTS: Deviation from the target axis of implantation was significantly less in group II on PODs 1 and 30 (group I: 5.5°±3.3°, group II: 3.6°±2.6°; p=0.005). Postoperative refractive cylinder was -0.89±0.35 D in group I and -0.64±0.36 D in group II (p=0.003). Visual acuity was comparable between both the groups. Visual quality measured in terms of Strehl ratio (p<0.05) and modulation transfer function (MTF) (p<0.05) was significantly better in the image-guided surgery group. Significant negative correlation was observed between deviation from target axis and visual quality parameters (Strehl ratio and MTF) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Image-guided surgery allows precise alignment of toric IOL without need for reference marking. It is associated with superior visual quality which correlates with the precision of IOL alignment.

Unilateral Congenital Cataract: Clinical Profile and Presentation.

PURPOSE: To study the clinical profile and presentation of children with unilateral cataract. METHODS: In this hospital-based, observational, cross-sectional study, patients 15 years of age or younger who presented with unilateral cataract were recruited. Cases of cataract secondary to causes such as trauma or uveitis were excluded. Age at detection and presentation, distance from the treatment center, presenting complaints, cataract morphology, and biometry were noted for each case. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were recruited. Most patients presented with complaints of leukocoria. Persistent fetal vasculature accounted for 27.6% of cases and was the most common identifiable cause of cataract in this study. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups: no persistent fetal vasculature (control) and persistent fetal vasculature. A male predominance was noted in both groups. The mean age at detection was 27.58 ± 37.02 and 6.17 ± 8.42 months and the mean age at presentation was 55.613 ± 45.21 and 14.83 ± 17.75 months in the control and persistent fetal vasculature groups, respectively. In the persistent fetal vasculature group, a significant difference was noted in the axial length, keratometry, and corneal diameter between the affected and normal eyes (P = .027, .00176, and .0114, respectively). In the control group, this difference was observed only in keratometry readings (P = .0464). The mean distance traveled by patients to reach the treatment center was 211 km. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent fetal vasculature is an important and less identified cause of unilateral cataract. A significant delay is noted in the detection and presentation of unilateral cataract. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(2):107-112.].

Evaluation of Time to Donor Lenticule Apposition Using Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the time to donor lenticule apposition in cases of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT). METHODS: Thirty eyes of 27 patients planned to undergo Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty were enrolled in this prospective study. In group I (n = 10), continuous intracameral positive pressure was maintained for 8 minutes. In group II (n = 10) and group III (n = 10), external corneal massage was initiated simultaneously with positive intracameral air pressure. The external corneal massage was continued till complete resolution of interface fluid; the positive intracameral pressure was maintained for 8 minutes in group II and for 5 minutes in group III. The host-donor relationship was continuously monitored with the iOCT. The main outcome measure was time to complete donor lenticule apposition. RESULTS: In group I, the interface fluid persisted after 8 minutes of positive intracameral pressure in all eyes (10/10); hence an external corneal massage was required to achieve optimal donor adherence. In groups II and III, all eyes (20/20) had complete resolution of the interface fluid at the end of 3 minutes. In 100% of the eyes (30/30), the grafts were attached after anterior chamber decompression as seen on the iOCT. In all cases, the donor lenticules were adhered in the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: iOCT helps in understanding that the donor lenticule is well apposed within 1 to 3 minutes with the technique of simultaneous positive intracameral pressure and external corneal massage. This knowledge minimizes the waiting time for graft apposition and prevents prolonged intraocular pressure elevation.