Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program.

PURPOSE: To examine the characteristics of US medical students applying for ophthalmology residency and to determine the predictors of matching. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3435 medical students from the United States who applied to an ophthalmology residency program from 2003 to 2008 were included. METHODS: Matched and unmatched applicants were compared and stratified by predictor variables, including United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status, medical school reputation, and medical school geographic region. Differences in proportions were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of successful matching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful matching to an ophthalmology program. RESULTS: The majority of applicants (72%, 2486/3435) matched in ophthalmology. In multivariate analysis, AOA membership (odds ratio [OR], 2.6, P<0.0001), USMLE score (OR, 1.6; P<0.0001), presence of an ophthalmology residency at medical school (OR, 1.4; P = 0.01), top 25 medical school (OR, 1.4; P<0.03), top 10 medical school (OR, 1.6; P<0.02), and allopathic degree (OR, 4.0; P<0.0001) were statistically significant predictors of matching. Approximately 60% (1442/2486) of applicants matched to the same geographic region as their medical school. Applicants were more likely to match at a program in the same geographic region as their medical school than would be predicted by chance alone (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, higher USMLE score (OR, 0.9; P<0.0001) and top 10 medical school (OR, 0.7; P = 0.027) were statistically significant predictors of matching to outside the geographic region as one's medical school. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of applicants applying for an ophthalmology residency position match successfully. Higher performance on quantitative metrics seems to confer an advantage for matching. The majority of applicants match at a residency program within the same geographic region as one's medical school.

Anesthesia care for living-related liver transplantation for infants and children with end-stage liver disease: report of our initial experience.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience of the perioperative anesthetic care provided to pediatric recipients during living-related liver transplantation. DESIGN: Cohort review of the perioperative anesthetic care for living-related liver transplantation. SETTING: Tertiary referral and postgraduate teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 27 children (20 males, 7 females) with end-stage hereditary metabolic liver disease requiring living-related liver transplantation. INTERVENTION: Perioperative care was administered during living-related liver transplantation. MEASUREMENTS: The major intraoperative physiologic events and concerns are described, as well as the anesthesia technique for pediatric living-related liver transplantation anesthesia. Intraoperative changes in physiologic parameters and the intraoperative requirements in our series are also reported. MAIN RESULTS: During a 30-month period, 27 children (20 males and 7 females) were scheduled for transplantation with an hepatic graft from a living-related donor. Twenty-six children received a graft from a living-related donor, and one was retransplanted with a cadaveric graft because of graft failure, and one child received a cadaveric graft because of the lack of a suitable donor. All patients received intravenous (IV) anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and cisatracurium, and were ventilated with oxygen/air. Mean induction and presurgical preparation time was 1.18 hours, with a surgical time of 6.55 hours. All but one patient was extubated on the evening of the operating day after receiving a mean dose of 8.67 microg kg(-1) hr(-1) of fentanyl and a mean dose of 0.124 mg kg(-1) hr(-1) midazolam. The need for crystalloid infusion was 24.0 mL kg(-1) hr(-1), fresh frozen plasma (FFP)16.63 mL kg(-1) hr(-1), and red blood cells 7.98 mL kg(-1) hr(-1). There was no mortality and no anesthetic-related morbidity in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Total IV anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and cisatracurium, after preoperative optimization, is a well-tolerated approach for children undergoing living-related liver transplantation and offers quick recovery. This anesthetic technique was aimed at minimizing the effects on the cardiovascular system, and also any consequences related to the possible occurrence of a reperfusion syndrome. Fluid balance was aimed at optimizing flow through the hepatic graft and preventing thrombosis of vascular anastomoses.