Providing dust mite-proof covers improves adherence to dust mite control measures in children with mite allergy and asthma.

INTRODUCTION: The most critical dust mite avoidance technique for asthmatic children with mite allergy is the use of dust mite-proof bedding covers. Adherence to allergen control measures is poor due to cost. The purpose of this study was to determine whether giving families mite-proof bedding encasings at the time of the diagnosis with mite allergy would improve adherence at a home visit 2 months later. METHODS: Parents of children (mean age 7.7 years) with asthma and positive skin tests for dust mite were assigned either to an intervention group, which received dust mite covers upon enrollment or a comparison group, which did not. Both groups were instructed in dust mite control measures by a medical provider and told to invest in the covers as part of standard care. Two months after enrollment, parent report and observational measures from each family were obtained during a home visit. RESULTS: The group provided allergen encasings was found to be significantly more likely to have used the casings at the home visit, t(22) = 2.77, P < 0.05. There were no differences between groups in adherence to other mite control strategies. Parenting stress was significantly related to poorer mite control compliance. The most common reason reported for nonadherence to control measures was cost. CONCLUSIONS: Providing mite bedding encasings at the time of diagnosis significantly increases compliance at a 2-month home visit. Medicaid and insurance companies should be encouraged to pay for casings as a cost effective measure to improve asthma care in children with mite allergy.

Living with a chronic illness: a measure of social functioning for children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure of social functioning in children and adolescents with chronic medical conditions, Living with a Chronic Illness (LCI), designed to distinguish social difficulties related to the illness from those social difficulties associated with other factors (e.g., limited income). METHODS: Parents (n = 108) and youths (n = 115) completed the LCI, along with other psychological measures (e.g., Youth Self-Report). Teachers completed the Teacher Report Form and provided grade and absence data. Health care utilization data were obtained from medical charts. RESULTS: Statistical analyses supported the internal consistency and initial validity of LCI scores. Correlational results strongly point to the distinction made between illness-related and non-illness-related social difficulties and suggest that the LCI has some relation to existing measures (e.g., Child Behavior Checklist), while still providing a unique perspective on children's social functioning. Univariate and regression analyses revealed significant relations between LCI scores and health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the initial psychometric properties and clinical utility of the LCI scores. We discuss strengths and limitations of this study, as well as potential clinical applications for the LCI questionnaire.

Parental correlates of unintentional burn injuries in infancy and early childhood.

The main purpose of this paper is to review parental factors associated with unintentional burns in early childhood. The problem and characteristics of early childhood burns are discussed. Child injury prevention strategies and models are presented. Parental correlates of pediatric injuries in general and specific to burns are reviewed. In conclusion, the authors recommend greater examination of parental variables potentially amenable to treatment, such as psychological functioning, and improved methodology including the use of prospective analyses, multiple methods and informants, and comparison groups. These efforts should enable greater understanding of parental factors related and causal to early childhood burns and, in turn, guide prevention initiatives.