Removal of heavy metals from water sources in the developing world using low-cost materials: A review.

Heavy metal contamination is a growing concern in the developing world. Inadequate water and wastewater treatment, coupled with increased industrial activity, have led to increased heavy metal contamination in rivers, lakes, and other water sources in developing countries. However, common methods for removing heavy metals from water sources, including membrane filtration, activated carbon adsorption, and electrocoagulation, are not feasible for developing countries. As a result, a significant amount of research has been conducted on low-cost adsorbents to evaluate their ability to remove heavy metals. In this review article, we summarize the current state of research on the removal of heavy metals with an emphasis on low-cost adsorbents that are feasible in the context of the developing world. This review evaluates the use of adsorbents from four major categories: agricultural waste; naturally-occurring soil and mineral deposits; aquatic and terrestrial biomass; and other locally-available waste materials. Along with a summary of the use of these adsorbents in the removal of heavy metals, this article provides a summary of the influence of various water-quality parameters on heavy metals and these adsorbents. The proposed adsorption mechanisms for heavy metal removal are also discussed.

Removal of micropollutants and NOM in carbon nanotube-UF membrane system from seawater.

One of the main problems for seawater reverse osmosis desalination is membrane fouling associated with natural organic matter. Bisphenol-A (BPA) and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) are well-known endocrine-disrupting compounds that have been detected in wastewater and seawater. In this study, the contribution of carbon nanotubes (CNTs, single-walled carbon nanotubes) to membrane fouling control and the potential adsorption mechanisms of BPA and EE2 were investigated using artificial seawater (ASW) in a bench scale ultrafiltration (UF) membrane coupled with CNTs. For high ionic strength ASW, UVA254 nm is a good alternative for highly aromatic dissolved organic carbon (DOC) determination, with a very strong linear relationship (R2 > or = 0.99) with increasing DOC concentrations. Approximately 80% of DOC in ASW was rejected by the CNT-UF system where 31% of DOC was removed due to adsorption by CNTs. The presence of CNTs shows a 20% increase in membrane flux in ASW. A strong linear correlation between retention and adsorption of BPA and EE2 was obtained. The percentage of adsorption/retention of BPA and EE2 in UF-CNTs follows the order: 94.0/96.6 (DI + CNTs, EE2) > 86.2/90.0 (ASW + CNTs, EE2) > 73.6/78.9 (DI + CNTS, BPA) > or = 74.1/77.3 (ASW + CNTS, BPA) > 29.8/29.8 (ASW, EE2) approximately equal to 27.3/27.3 (ASW, BPA) > or = 25.3/25.3 (DI, EE2) approximately equal to 24.8/24.8 (DI, BPA). This indicates that retention by the UF-CNT system is mainly due to adsorption. Overall, EE2 adsorption was greater than BPA during the UF-CNT experiments, presumably due to the higher hydrophobicity of EE2 than BPA.

Removal of bisphenol A and 17α-ethinyl estradiol from landfill leachate using single-walled carbon nanotubes.

In this study, the adsorption of bisphenol A (BPA) and 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2) from landfill leachate onto single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) was investigated. Different leachate solutions were prepared by altering the pH, ionic strength, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the solutions to mimic the varying water conditions that occur in leachate during the various stages of waste decomposition. The youngest and oldest leachate solutions contained varying DOC and background chemistry and were represented by leachate Type A (pH = 5.0; DOC = 2500 mg/L; conductivity = 12,500 µS/cm; [Ca(2+)] = 1200 mg/L; [Mg(2+)] = 470 mg/L) and Type E (pH = 7.5; DOC = 250 mg/L; conductivity = 3250 µS/cm; [Ca(2+)] = 60 mg/L; [Mg(2+)] = 180 mg/L). These solutions were subsequently combined in different ratios to produce intermediate solutions, labeled B-D, to replicate time-dependent changes in leachate composition. Overall, a larger fraction of EE2 was removed as compared to BPA, consistent with its higher log K(OW) value. The total removal of BPA and EE2 decreased in older leachate solutions, with the adsorptive capacity of SWCNTs decreasing in the order of leachate Type A > Type B > Type C > Type D > Type E. An increase in the pH from 3.5 to 11 decreased the adsorption of BPA by 22% in young leachate and by 10% in old leachate. The changes in pH did not affect the adsorption of EE2 in the young leachate, but did reduce adsorption by 32% in the old leachate. Adjusting the ionic strength using Na(+) did not significantly impact adsorption, while increasing the concentration of Ca(2+) resulted in a 12% increase in the adsorption of BPA and a 19% increase in the adsorption of EE2. DOC was revealed to be the most influential parameter in this study. In the presence of hydrophilic DOC, represented by glucose in this study, adsorption of the endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) onto the SWCNTs was not affected. In the absence of SWCNTs, hydrophobic DOC (i.e., humic acid) adsorbed 15-20% of BPA and EE2. However, when the humic acid and SWCNTs were both present, the overall adsorptive capacity of the SWCNTs was reduced. Hydrophobic (π-π electron donor-acceptor) interactions between the EDCs and the constituents in the leachate, as well as interactions between the SWCNTs and the EDCs, are proposed as potential adsorption mechanisms for BPA and EE2 onto SWCNTs.