ABSTRACT
Background: Recording large-group lectures is commonplace in higher education, allowing students to access content asynchronously and remotely. With the move towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, recording of small-group teaching sessions has also become increasingly common; however, the educational value of this practice is unknown. Methods: All medical students rotating through the Acute Medicine Department of a large teaching hospital were invited to enrol in the study. Consenting students were recorded for the second half of an online case-based learning (CBL) session. The recording was available for 6 months; viewing patterns were analysed. Students were sent a questionnaire after the session, asking them to reflect on the recorded and unrecorded halves of the session. Findings: Thirty-three students underwent recording in 12 separate groups; 31 students (94%) completed the questionnaire. All 31 respondents (100%) described the session as "useful" or "very useful". Twenty-four respondents (77%) recommended continuing to record small-group sessions and 17 (55%) reported being "likely" or "very likely" to watch the recording. Six respondents (19%) reported a negative impact of being recorded. During 6 months of follow-up, no students returned to view the recording for more than 1 minute. Conclusion: Despite positive feedback for the session and high student demand for ongoing recording, no students viewed the recording for any significant duration. One-fifth of students reported a negative impact of being recorded. The findings from this study do not support routine recording of small-group CBL sessions, even where demand for this may exist. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01837-5.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies utilising different testing criteria, and review the clinical details of a series of patients with associated autoimmune myopathy. METHODS: The incidence of anti-HMGCR antibodies in 2019 from 3 groups, South West London, Berkshire/Surrey and Southampton, were compared in the adult population. Anti-HMGCR antibodies were measured by commercial chemiluminescent and immunodot assays. The case notes of patients with anti-HMGCR antibodies were reviewed for the case series. RESULTS: The estimated incidence of anti-HMGCR antibodies in the first 2 groups was 1.94 per million adults per year, and in the third group 10.3 per million adults per year. In the first 2 groups the test criteria restricted analysis to specific clinician request for anti-HMGCR. In the third group test criteria included cases with less specific clinical features or a cytoplasmic indirect immunofluorescence anti-nuclear antibody pattern. The latter strategy had a positive predictive value of 66.1% for anti-HMGCR associated myopathy. A case series of 27 patients with anti-HMGCR antibodies revealed 19 with myopathy, oesophageal involvement in 26% and median peak CK 8000 IU/L. Response to treatment, including intravenous immunoglobulin, was good with CK normalising after median 5.5 months. In 8 cases there was no evidence of autoimmune muscle disease, 7 not statin exposed. CONCLUSIONS: Varying criteria result in a 5-fold difference in estimated incidence of anti-HMGCR antibodies, revealing positive cases without evidence of myopathy. Patients with anti-HMGCR myopathy respond well to immune suppression, supporting wider testing for these antibodies amongst patients with myopathy.
