ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Shunt-related adverse events are frequent in infants after modified Blalock-Taussig despite use of acetylsalicylic acid prophylaxis. A higher incidence of acetylsalicylic acid-resistance and sub-therapeutic acetylsalicylic acid levels has been reported in infants. We evaluated whether using high-dose acetylsalicylic acid can decrease shunt-related adverse events in infants after modified Blalock-Taussig. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, we included infants ⩽1-year-old who underwent modified Blalock-Taussig placement and received acetylsalicylic acid in the ICU. We defined acetylsalicylic acid treatment groups as standard dose (⩽7 mg/kg/day) and high dose (⩾8 mg/kg/day) based on the initiating dose. RESULTS: There were 34 infants in each group. Both groups were similar in age, gender, cardiac defect type, ICU length of stay, and time interval to second stage or definitive repair. Shunt interventions (18 versus 32%, p=0.16), shunt thrombosis (14 versus 17%, p=0.74), and mortality (9 versus 12%, p=0.65) were not significantly different between groups. On multiple logistic regression analysis, single-ventricle morphology (odds ratio 5.2, 95% confidence interval of 1.2-23, p=0.03) and post-operative red blood cells transfusion ⩾24 hours [odds ratio 15, confidence interval of (3-71), p<0.01] were associated with shunt-related adverse events. High-dose acetylsalicylic acid treatment [odds ratio 2.6, confidence interval of (0.7-10), p=0.16] was not associated with decrease in these events. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose acetylsalicylic acid may not be sufficient in reducing shunt-related adverse events in infants after modified Blalock-Taussig. Post-operative red blood cells transfusion may be a modifiable risk factor for these events. A randomised trial is needed to determine appropriate acetylsalicylic acid dosing in infants with modified Blalock-Taussig.
Subject(s)
Aspirin/administration & dosage , Blalock-Taussig Procedure/adverse effects , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Computed Tomography Angiography , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Thrombosis/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric intensivists frequently prescribe platelet transfusions to critically ill children, but there are limited data on platelet transfusion practice and platelet transfusion-related outcomes in the PICU. In this study, we evaluated the current platelet transfusion practice and platelet transfusion-related outcomes in the PICU. DESIGN: Institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study from January 2010 to March 2016. SETTING: Tertiary-level PICU. PATIENTS: Children less than 19 years old who received platelet transfusions in the PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (1,547/4,339) of platelet transfusions in the institution were given to 2.4% of PICU patients (232/9,659). The patients who received a platelet transfusion (platelet transfusions, n = 232) compared with those who did not receive platelets (no platelet transfusions, n = 9,427) were younger, had similar gender distribution, had a higher median Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score, and stayed longer in the PICU. Fifty percent of platelet transfusions were prescribed prophylactically for thrombocytopenia to patients without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. The mortality was higher for platelet transfusions group (30% vs 2.3%) with an 18 times increased unadjusted odds of mortality when compared with no platelet transfusion group (odds ratio, 18.2; 95% CI, 13.3-24.8; p < 0.0001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the predicted probability of dying for platelet transfusion group compared with no platelet transfusion group depended on the median Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score. Patients who received platelet transfusion versus no platelet transfusion have increased odds of dying at lower median Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 scores, but decreased odds of dying at higher median Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 scores. CONCLUSIONS: This PICU cohort demonstrates that the odds or predicted probability of dying change in patients who received platelet transfusions based on underlying disease severity measured by Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score compared with patients who did not receive platelet transfusions. A large, prospective trial is required to confirm this association and determine whether to consider underlying disease severity in estimating risks and benefits of prophylactic platelet transfusions in critically ill children.
