Clinical manifestations and outcome of anti-PL7 positive patients with antisynthetase syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to determine both clinical manifestations and outcome of anti-PL7 patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS). METHODS: The medical records of 15 consecutive anti-PL7 patients with biopsy proven ASS were retrospectively analyzed without prior selection. RESULTS: Anti-PL7 patients exhibited polymyositis (n=14) and dermatomyositis (n=1); extra-pulmonary manifestations of ASS included: Raynaud's phenomenon (40%), mechanic's hands (33.3%), joint impairment (26.7%), pericardial effusion (20%) and esophageal/gastrointestinal involvement (20%). The outcome of myositis was as follows: remission/improvement (91.7%) and deterioration (8.3%). Fourteen patients (93.3%) experienced interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILD preceded ASS diagnosis (n=5), was identified concomitantly with ASS (n=8) and occurred after ASS diagnosis (n=1). Patients could be divided into 3 groups according to their presenting lung manifestations: acute onset of lung disease (n=1), progressive onset of lung signs (n=11) and asymptomatic patients exhibiting abnormalities consistent with ILD on PFT and HRCT-scan (n=2). No patient had resolution of ILD, whereas 64.3% and 35.7% experienced improvement and deterioration of ILD, respectively. ILD resulted in respiratory insufficiency requiring O2 therapy in 14.3% of cases. Two patients died. Predictive parameters of ILD deterioration were: DLCO<45% at ILD diagnosis and HRCT-scan pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). CONCLUSION: Our series mainly underscores that ILD is frequent in anti-PL7 patients, leading to high morbidity. Our study further suggests that patients with predictive factors of ILD deterioration may require more aggressive therapy, especially the group of patients with DLCO<45% at ILD diagnosis and UIP pattern on HRCT-scan.

Interstitial lung disease in anti-Jo-1 patients with antisynthetase syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in anti-Jo-1 patients with antisynthetase syndrome, determine predictive variables of ILD deterioration in these patients, and compare features of anti-Jo-1 patients with and without ILD. METHODS: Ninety-one anti-Jo-1 patients were identified by medical records search in 4 medical centers. All of these patients had undergone pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (72.5%) had ILD. Patients could be divided into 3 groups according to their presenting lung manifestations: acute onset of lung disease (n = 12), progressive onset of lung signs (n = 35), and asymptomatic patients exhibiting abnormalities consistent with ILD on PFTs and HRCT scans (n = 19). Sixteen patients had resolution of ILD; 39 and 11 patients experienced improvement and deterioration of ILD, respectively. ILD led to decreased functional status, since 29.8% of patients exhibited a marked reduction of activities due to ILD and 13.6% had respiratory insufficiency requiring oxygen therapy; 5 of 6 patients died due to ILD complications. Predictive parameters of ILD deterioration were HRCT scan pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, respiratory muscle involvement, and age ≥55 years. Furthermore, anti-Jo-1 patients with ILD, compared with those without, more frequently exhibited mechanic's hands and lower creatine kinase levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that ILD is a frequent complication in anti-Jo-1 patients, resulting in high morbidity. We suggest that patients with predictive factors of ILD deterioration may require more aggressive therapy. Finally, anti-Jo-1 patients with ILD, compared with those without, may exhibit a particular clinical phenotype.

Comparison of long-term outcome between anti-Jo1- and anti-PL7/PL12 positive patients with antisynthetase syndrome.

The aims of the present study were to: compare the characteristics between antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) patients with anti-Jo1 antibody and those with anti-PL7/PL12 antibody. The medical records of 95 consecutive patients with ASS were reviewed. Seventy-five of these patients had anti-Jo1 antibody; the other patients had anti-PL7 (n=15) or anti-PL12 (n=5) antibody. At ASS diagnosis, the prevalence of myalgia (p=0.007) and muscle weakness (p=0.02) was significantly lower in the group of anti-PL7/PL12-positive patients than in those with anti-Jo1 antibody; median value of CK (p=0.00003) was also lower in anti-PL7/PL12 patients. Anti-Jo1 positive patients developed more rarely myositis resolution (21.3% vs. 46.2%); in addition, the overall recurrence rate of myositis was higher in anti-Jo1 positive patients than in patients with anti-PL7/PL12 antibody (65.9% vs. 19.4%). Anti-Jo1-positive patients, compared with those with anti-PL7/PL12 antibody, more often experienced: joint involvement (63.3%vs. 40%) and cancer (13.3% vs. 5%). By contrast, anti-PL7/PL12 positive patients, compared with those with anti-Jo1 antibody, more commonly exhibited: ILD (90% vs. 68%); in anti-PL7/PL12 positive patients, ILD was more often symptomatic at diagnosis, and led more rarely to resolution of lung manifestations (5.6% vs. 29.4%). Finally, the group of anti-PL7/PL12 positive patients more commonly experienced gastrointestinal manifestations related to ASS (p=0.02). Taken together, although anti-Jo1 positive patients with ASS share some features with those with anti-PL7/PL12 antibody, they exhibit many differences regarding clinical phenotype and long-term outcome. Our study underscores that the presence of anti-Jo1 antibody results in more severe myositis, joint impairment and increased risk of cancer. On the other hand, the presence of anti-PL7/PL12 antibody is markedly associated with: early and severe ILD, and gastrointestinal complications. Thus, our study interestingly indicates that the finding for anti-Jo1 and anti-PL7/PL12 antibodies impacts both the long-term outcome and prognosis of patients with ASS.

[TRAPS: clinical significance of genotype. A report of two cases]. / TRAPS : influence du génotype sur l'expression de la maladie. À propos de deux observations.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) is defined as recurrent attacks of generalized inflammation for which no infectious or auto-immune cause can be identified; it is caused by dominantly inherited mutations in the gene encoding the first TNF receptor. We report two additional cases of patients with TRAPS, suggesting that mutation pattern of TNFRSF 1A gene may influence the TRAPS phenotype. CASE REPORTS: The first patient, with a C30S mutation, exhibited severe digestive clinical manifestations; because the patient required high-dose corticosteroids regimen to improve TRAPS manifestations, he was further given successfully etanercept. The second patient, with a R92Q mutation of TNFRSF 1A gene, presented with moderate symptoms; TRAPS outcome was favourable after corticosteroid therapy initiation. CONCLUSION: Therefore, R92Q may be associated with a mild disease phenotype. On the other hand, C30S mutation appears to be associated with a severe phenotype, leading to an increased risk of amyloidosis. These findings suggest that these latter patients may require a closer follow-up.

Controlled release of bisphosphonate from a calcium phosphate biomaterial inhibits osteoclastic resorption in vitro.

Calcium phosphate biomaterials such as calcium deficient apatite (CDA) have been contemplated as carrier for delivery of bisphosphonate in bone tissues. In the present work, we have investigated the in vitro biological properties of Zoledronate-loaded CDA. CDA was loaded with zoledronate according to a previously described coating process. 31P MAS NMR spectra demonstrated the effective loading of zoledronate onto CDA. Using 14C labeled zoledronate, we then demonstrated the in vitro release of zoledronate from CDA. In a first set of experiments, we confirmed that Zoledronate reduced the number of TRAP-, vitronectin receptor-, and F-actin ring-positive cells as well as the resorption activity of osteoclasts obtained from a total rabbit bone cell culture. Interestingly, Zoledronate-loaded CDA and its extractive solutions decreased the osteoclastic resorption. Finally, zoledronate-loaded CDA did not affect the viability and alkaline phosphatase activity of primary osteoblastic cells. These data demonstrate that CDA is effective for loading and release of zoledronate. The released zoledronate inhibited osteoclastic resorption without affecting osteoblasts. Our findings therefore suggest that such a drug delivery system would allow an increase in the efficiency of bisphosphonates by being locally available. Further experiments are now required to evaluate the in vivo antiresorptive activity of this concept.

Synthesis of thiaazaheterocycle nucleoside analogues.

The syntheses of thiazinone, thiazinedione and thiazolinone base modified nucleoside analogues have been discussed in both the deoxy- and ribosyl series. Both inter- and intramolecular N-glycosylations were evaluated.

Effect of alfacalcidol on natural course of renal bone disease in mild to moderate renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether alfacalcidol--used in management of overt renal bone disease--may safely prevent renal bone disease when used earlier in course of renal failure. DESIGN: Double blind, prospective, randomised, placebo controlled study. SETTING: 17 nephrology centres from Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 176 patients aged 18-81 with mild to moderate chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance 15-50 ml/min) and with no clinical, biochemical, or radiographic evidence of bone disease. INTERVENTIONS: Alfacalcidol 0.25 micrograms (titrated according to serum calcium concentration) or placebo given for two years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative histology of bone to assess efficacy of treatment and renal function to assess safety. RESULTS: 132 patients had histological evidence of bone disease at start of study. Biochemical, radiographic, and histological indices of bone metabolism were similar for the 89 patients given alfacalcidol and the 87 controls given placebo. After treatment, mean serum alkaline phosphatase activity and intact parathyroid hormone concentration had increased by 13% and 126% respectively in controls but had not changed in patients given alfacalcidol (P < 0.001). Hypercalcaemic episodes occurred in 10 patients given alfacalcidol (but responded to decreases in drug dose) and in three controls. Histological indices of bone turnover significantly improved in patients given alfacalcidol and significantly deteriorated in controls: among patients with abnormal bone histology before treatment, bone disease resolved in 23 (42%) of those given alfacalcidol compared with two (4%) of the controls (P < 0.001). There was no difference in rate of progression of renal failure between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Early administration of alfacalcidol can safely and beneficially alter the natural course of renal bone disease in patients with mild to moderate renal failure.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following repeated doses in hemodialyzed uraemic patients.

Zolpidem, an imidazopyridine derivative, is a chemically novel, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent. Many uraemic patients complain of sleep disorders and ask for hypnotic medication which is well tolerated both clinically and biologically in such patients. We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem in 12 end-stage renal patients regularly treated by hemodialysis three times a week. Zolpidem (10 mg) was given orally for 14 or 21 days. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations were repeated at the end of the study on day 14 or day 21. Cmax, Tmax, t1/2 and the area under the curve were not modified in hemodialyzed patients. After daytime dosing, zolpidem induced the same level of sleepiness after the first and last dose and was well tolerated as a hypnotic agent after the night-time dosing. From these results, it can be said that zolpidem may be administered safely to patients with severe renal impairment without any modification of the dosage regimen.