Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 112(39): 655-62, 2015 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26479485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 5-10% of schoolchildren in Germany are absent from school without an excuse more than five times per year. We investigate the effectiveness of manual-based, multimodal cognitive behavioral therapy focusing on school-avoidant behavior and on the underlying mental disorders. METHODS: 112 school avoiders were recruited from an outpatient child and adolescent psychiatric clinic and adaptively randomized into two treatment groups. The first group received manual-based multimodal treatment (MT), the second group treatment as usual (TAU) in the child and adolescent mental health care system. The primary outcome of the study was the percentage of classes attended in the five days prior to first measurement (before the intervention), as well as 6 and 12 months afterward. In each of these periods, school attendance was characterized as regular, partial, or none. Secondary outcomes were the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and quality of family life. RESULTS: In both treatment arms, the percentage of regular school attenders rose to about 60% in 6 months, regardless of the intervention (MT 60.6%, TAU 58.3%; odds ratio [OR] for changes over baseline 6.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.98-12.12, p< 0.001; OR for MT versus TAU 1.05, 95% CI 0.58-1.90, p = 0.875). The improvement persisted 12 months after inclusion. CONCLUSION: In accordance with earlier studies, we found that manual-based multimodal treatment did not improve school avoidance to any greater extent than treatment as usual. Future studies should focus on the conditions for successful reintegration in school and on the differential indicators for outpatient versus inpatient treatment.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Child Behavior Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Avoidance Learning , Child , Child Behavior/psychology , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child, Preschool , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 23(9): 753-64, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585346

ABSTRACT

Only a limited number of national surveys have investigated both somatic and mental health service use in children and adolescents. The current study aimed to assess service use in Germany as based on at least a single contact with a somatic (pediatrician, general practitioner, nonmedical practitioner) and/or mental health (psychiatrist, psychologist, youth welfare) care specialist within the last 12 months. Questionnaire responses of 6,475 children and adolescents aged 11.0-17.9 years and their parents were analyzed based on data ascertained by the German Child and Adolescent Health Survey (KiGGS) conducted between 2003 and 2006. For assessment of mental symptom loading the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was completed by parents, thus allowing the determination of the relationship between symptom loading and service use. ANOVA and logistic regression were performed to determine help-seeking behavior overall and of different health professional groups upon inclusion of the SDQ Total Difficulties score, gender, age and socio-economic status (SES). A total of 81.9 % of all children and adolescents had used any kind of service within the past 12 months. Seventy-seven percent and 0.8 % used only the somatic and mental health services, respectively; 4.1 % had frequented both services. Amongst youths with a 'borderline' and 'abnormal' Total Difficulties score, 11.8 and 18.6 %, respectively, sought help from mental health partners. Age, SES and Total Difficulties score were predictors of any service use; the logistic regression model explained 7.6 % of the variance. Use of mental health service was significantly predicted by only age and Total Difficulties score, the respective model explained 26.2 % of the variance. The comparison of health services use on an international level is rendered difficult by national differences in health-care provision. Nevertheless, several of our findings are similar to results obtained in other nationally representative surveys.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Analysis of Variance , Child , Child Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...