Colorectal anastomotic leakage corrected by transanal laparoscopy.

AIM: Interest in transanal laparoscopy has increased in the last decade. This approach can allow primary procedures such as polypectomy, total mesorectal excision and the treatment of postoperative complications such as bleeding, leakage and fistula formation. METHOD: Two patients treated by transanal repair for leakage of a colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum are reported. The first developed leakage immediately during the surgery and in the second leakage presented at 4 weeks. A new transanal platform according to DAPRI (Karl Storz-Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany), formed by a reusable port and reusable monocurved instruments was developed to permit manipulation of sutures introduced via the anus in a maximally ergonomic manner. Laparoscopic suturing was performed transanally and a protective ileostomy was added as well. RESULTS: The transanal procedures took 60 and 45 min and the patients were discharged after 5 days and 2 days. At 2 months both defects were found to be healed on contrast radiology and endoscopy; therefore the ileostomy was closed. Anal function was satisfactory with a frequency of two and one times per 24 h with no incontinence or evidence of sepsis. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative or late leakage of colorectal anastomosis can be safely treated by transanal laparoscopy. This new transanal platform offers the surgeon the possibility to work in ergonomic positions, without increasing the cost of the procedure thanks to the reusable nature of the material used.

To eat or not to eat: facilitating early oral intake after elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It was shown that patients in the Netherlands remain exposed to unnecessarily prolonged starvation after abdominal surgery. The present study examined whether a structured collaborative effort would help to implement the early start of oral nutrition after colorectal surgery. METHODS: In 2006, twenty-six Dutch hospitals signed up to a "breakthrough project" concerning the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme with early oral feeding as one of the key elements. Each hospital determined the usual start of food intake by analyzing 50 patients who underwent a colorectal resection in 2004 (n=1126). Subsequently, over the course of one year 861 colorectal surgery patients were treated according to the ERAS programme. The first day that patients were eating before and after the breakthrough project was compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients treated according to the ERAS programme were eating 3 days earlier than the patients traditionally treated (p<0.000). Two days after surgery 65% of the ERAS patients were eating normal food versus 7% of the pre-ERAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present nationwide collaborative effort was successful in implementing a change towards an early start of oral nutrition after abdominal surgery.

Life and death of the nasogastric tube in elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is abundant evidence that the routine use of nasogastric decompression following elective abdominal surgery is ineffective in achieving any goals it is intended for. Nevertheless its use is still standard of care. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether it is possible to ban nasogastric decompression after elective colonic surgery. METHODS: At first baseline measurements concerning elements of perioperative care, including nasogastric tubes, were recorded retrospectively over the year 2004. In 2006-2007 the implementation of a fast-track colonic surgery project was guided by the Dutch Institute for Quality of Healthcare CBO, using Berwick's Breakthrough approach. RESULTS: A total of 2007 patients were enrolled. The baseline measurement showed that the use of nasogastric drainage is still common practice in the Netherlands. 953 patients (88.3%) had a nasogastric tube postoperatively. That tube was removed after a median of 2.5 days (range 1-3 days). After the implementation of the Perioperative Care Breakthrough project the percentage of patients having a nasogastric tube postoperatively dropped to 9.6% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show using the Breakthrough Methodology it is possible to eradicate the inappropriate routine use of NG tubes.

Changes in outcome during implementation of a fast-track colonic surgery project in a university-affiliated general teaching hospital: advantages reached with ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery project) over a 1-year period.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes can be accomplished rapidly after implementing a fast-track colonic surgery project at a university-affiliated general teaching hospital. METHODS: In 2004 and 2005 all colonic surgery patients were recorded for a number of pre-, per- and postoperative care elements. In 2006, during the implementation of a fast-track program, changes were recorded. RESULTS: Before the implementation of the fast-track regime at our hospital, 97% of the patients (n = 89/92) received mechanical bowel preparation, in contrast to 3% (n = 1/36) afterwards (p < 0.0001). The application of thoracic epidural analgesia rose from 46% (n = 42/92) in 2004 and 2005 to 94% (n = 34/36) in 2006 (p < 0.0001). The use of nasogastric tubes postoperatively almost disappeared. 77% (n = 28/36) enjoyed a small meal on the 1st day after operation, compared to 0% (n = 0/92) in 2004 and 2005 (p < 0.0001). Median hospital stay was 6 (range 3-27) nights in 2006 compared to 9 (range 3-25) nights in 2005 and 9.5 (range 7-64) nights in 2004 (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that also at a district general teaching hospital advantages can be reached rapidly and safely by implementing fast-track surgery; especially a faster recovery.