Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dermatitis ; 27(4): 193-201, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27427821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate patch testing is reliant on proper preparation of patch test allergens. The stability of patch test allergens is dependent on several factors including vapor pressure (VP). OBJECTIVE: This investigation reviews the VP of American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergens and compares stability predictions based on VP with those established through clinical testing. METHODS: Standard references were accessed for determining VP in millimeters of mercury and associated temperature in degrees celsius. If multiple values were listed, VP at temperatures that most approximate indoor storage conditions (20°C and 25°C) were chosen. For mixes, the individual component with the highest VP was chosen as the overall VP, assuming that the most volatile substance would evaporate first. Antigens were grouped into low (≤0.001 mm Hg), moderate (<1 to >0.001 mm Hg), and high (≥1 mm Hg) volatility using arbitrary cutoff values. CONCLUSIONS: This review is consistent with previously reported data on formaldehyde, acrylates, and fragrance material instability. Given lack of testing data, VP can be useful in predicting patch test compound stability. Measures such as air-tight multidose reagent containers, sealed single-application dispensers, preparation of patches immediately before application, and storage at lower temperatures may remedy some of these issues.


Subject(s)
Allergens/chemistry , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/methods , Vapor Pressure , Humans , Societies, Medical
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 810: 464-84, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25207382

ABSTRACT

Incidence rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma has been on the rise in the United States for the past 20 years. UV radiation (UVR) exposure remains the most preventable environmental risk factor for these cancers. Aside from sun avoidance, sunscreens remain our best protection. UVR directly damages DNA and cause indirect cellular damage through the creation of reactive oxygen species, the sum of which leads to cutaneous immunosuppression and a tumorigenic milieu. The current generation of sunscreens protect from UVR through two main mechanisms: absorption and deflection. In the US, new Food and Drug Association rules require sunscreen manufacturers to evaluate their products not only on sun protection factor but also on broad spectrum UVA protection by the end of 2013. New labeling requirements will also be instituted. The American Academy of Dermatology and the American Academy of Pediatrics have provided specific recommendations for proper sun protection and sunscreen usage. Plant polyphenols such as those isolated from green tea, pomegranate, and grape seed remain an interesting avenue of research as additives to sunscreens or stand-alone products that appear to modulate the immunosuppressive effects of UVR on the skin. Additionally, although UVR induces endogenous cutaneous production of vitamin D, its damaging effects overshadow this positive benefit, especially in light of the ease of achieving recommended amounts of vitamin D through diet and supplementation.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/prevention & control , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Polyphenols/therapeutic use , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Government Regulation , Humans , Melanoma/immunology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/immunology , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Skin/immunology , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Sunscreening Agents/chemistry , Sunscreening Agents/classification , Ultraviolet Rays , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vitamin D/metabolism
4.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 79(6): 427-36, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22660875

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the major environmental risk factor for nonmelanoma skin cancer and is a suspected risk factor for melanoma. Avoiding overexposure to direct sunlight during the peak daylight hours, wearing protective clothing, and applying sunscreen are ways to protect the skin. To provide clinicians with the tools to advise patients and to answer their inquiries, including which sunscreen to use, we review UV radiation's effect on the skin, how sunscreens block UV light, current recommendations on sunscreen use, and new sunscreen labeling requirements.


Subject(s)
Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Skin/radiation effects , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Product Labeling/standards , Sunbathing , Sunscreening Agents/classification , Sunscreening Agents/standards , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Dermatol Surg ; 38(1): 51-7, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22093071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonablative fractional photothermolysis (FP) laser treatment has shown clinical efficacy on photo-aged skin. Few studies have examined the molecular responses to FP. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the dynamic alterations involved in dermal matrix remodeling after FP laser treatment. METHODS: A single multipass FP treatment was performed. Baseline, day 1, and day 7 biopsies were obtained. Biopsies were sectioned and stained for histology and immunofluorescence confocal microscopic. Heat shock protein-70 (HSP-70) and matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) expression and extracellular matrix (ECM) autofluorescence were examined. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) experiments were performed probing for collagen 1A1 (COL1A1) and COL3A1. RESULTS: All three patients were Caucasian women aged 49, 62, and 64 with Fitzpatrick skin types II, III, and IV. Transient neutrophilic infiltration found on day 1. Protein expression of HSP-70 and MMP-1 were up-regulated on day 1, reverting to baseline by day 7. ECM autofluorescence decreased from baseline to day 7. qRT-PCR showed a minor decrease in COL1A1 and COL3A1 messenger RNA 1 day after treatment. Variable results between patients receiving equal treatment were evident.


Subject(s)
Dermis/pathology , Laser Therapy , Skin Aging/radiation effects , Biopsy , Dermis/radiation effects , Extracellular Matrix/pathology , Extracellular Matrix/radiation effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Wound Healing
6.
Photochem Photobiol ; 87(4): 904-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21521233

ABSTRACT

The high prevalence of drug resistance necessitates the development of novel antifungal agents against infections caused by opportunistic fungal pathogens, such as Candida albicans. Elucidation of apoptosis in yeast-like fungi may provide a basis for future therapies. In mammalian cells, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been demonstrated to generate reactive oxygen species, leading to immediate oxidative modifications of biological molecules and resulting in apoptotic cell death. In this report, we assess the in vitro cytotoxicity and mechanism of PDT, using the photosensitizer Pc 4, in planktonic C. albicans. Confocal image analysis confirmed that Pc 4 localizes to cytosolic organelles, including mitochondria. A colony formation assay showed that 1.0 µM Pc 4 followed by light at 2.0 J cm(-2) reduced cell survival by 4 logs. XTT (2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxyanilide) assay revealed that Pc 4-PDT impaired fungal metabolic activity, which was confirmed using the FUN-1 (2-chloro-4-[2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-(benzo-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-methylidene]-1-phenylquinolinium iodide) fluorescence probe. Furthermore, we observed changes in nuclear morphology characteristic of apoptosis, which were substantiated by increased externalization of phosphatidylserine and DNA fragmentation following Pc 4-PDT. These data indicate that Pc 4-PDT can induce apoptosis in C. albicans. Therefore, a better understanding of the process will be helpful, as PDT may become a useful treatment option for candidiasis.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candida albicans/radiation effects , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Indoles/pharmacology , Organosilicon Compounds/pharmacology , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/chemistry , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/radiation effects , Candida albicans/growth & development , Candidiasis/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA Fragmentation/drug effects , DNA Fragmentation/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fluorescence , Humans , Indoles/chemistry , Light , Microscopy, Confocal , Mitochondria/drug effects , Mitochondria/metabolism , Mitochondria/radiation effects , Organosilicon Compounds/chemistry , Phosphatidylserines/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Plankton/drug effects , Plankton/growth & development , Plankton/radiation effects , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Tetrazolium Salts/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...