ABSTRACT
Brain metastases impact on the survival of the patients, but on their quality of life as well. The objective of the management of these patients is then double. Currently, due to medical advances, survivals tend to improve, especially for some tumor subtypes. During the course of the disease, different neurological signs and symptoms can be observed according to the location, the number and the volume of the metastase(s). Patients and caregivers are especially worried about the loss of autonomy and cognitive impairments. A permanent dialogue, during the course of the disease, is mandatory, in order to adapt the management to the objectives determined by the patients and the medical team. These objectives may vary according to the objective response rates of the disease to anticancer therapies, according to the impact of the disease and its management in daily living. Anticancer therapies and supportive care must be appreciated according to their impact on the survival, on the preservation of the functional independence and the quality of life of the patient, on their abilities to preserve the neurological status and delay the apparition of new neurological signs and symptoms, and their adverse events. Supportive care, cognition and quality of life should be regularly evaluated and adapted according to the objectives of the management of brain metastases patients. Different approaches are described in this paper.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Automobile Driving , Brain Neoplasms/complications , Brain Neoplasms/psychology , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/etiology , Epilepsy/psychology , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/drug therapy , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Neurologic Examination , Neuropsychological Tests , Patient Education as Topic , Patients/psychology , Personal Autonomy , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The combination of irinotecan-bevacizumab is effective in patients with glioblastoma relapse but fatigue is a commonly reported side effect. The objective of this study was to evaluate the level and evolution of fatigue in a series of patients treated with therapeutic combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used two self-evaluation tools to quantify the physical and emotional aspects of this fatigue. The Norris Visual Analog Scale (VAS Norris) and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI) tools were undertaken by 39 patients with glioblastoma relapse treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab, initially before the first cycle and thereafter with each cycle up until tumor progression. RESULTS: Analysis of the results of the VAS Norris scale did not demonstrate an increase in emotional fatigue but did show an increase in physical fatigue that did not reach statistical significance. With regards to the MFI 20 tool, analysis of the results demonstrated a significant increase in general (P=0.0260) as well as physical (P=0.0141) fatigue but there was no difference in the other indices. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a progressive increase in physical fatigue in patients with glioblastoma relapse treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab. We suspect that this is as a direct consequence of the treatment. There are however other confounding factors: insidious tumour progression not detected on follow-up imaging or delayed side effects of the initial radiotherapy-chemotherapy.
