A standardized letter of recommendation for residency application.

Emergency medicine (EM) program directors have expressed a desire for more evaluative data to be included in application materials. This is consistent with frustrations expressed by program directors of multiple specialties, but mostly by those in specialties with more competitive matches. Some of the concerns about traditional narrative letters of recommendation included lack of uniform information, lack of relative value given for interval grading, and a perception of ambiguity with regard to terminology. The Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors established a task force in 1995 that created a standardized letter of recommendation form. This form, to be completed by EM faculty, requests that objective, comparative, and narrative information be reported regarding the residency applicant.

Academic emergency medicine staffing nonacademic emergency department sites: a national survey.

UNLABELLED: Changing health care markets have threatened academic health centers and their traditional focus on teaching and research. OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of academic emergency medicine departments (AEMDs) that staff additional non-academic ED sites and to determine whether clinical reimbursement monies from those ED sites are used for academic purposes. METHODS: A two-part survey of all 119 academic EM programs listed in the 1997-1998 Graduate Medical Education Directory was conducted. Questionnaires were addressed to each AEMD chair. AEMDs and ED sites were characterized. Hiring difficulties, EM faculty academic productivity, and use of ED site reimbursement monies for academic activities were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 119 (83%) AEMDs responded. Twenty-three (23%) AEMDs staffed 28 added ED sites. These sites tended to be urban (65%), with moderate volumes (25,000-35,000 patients/year), and had an equal or better reimbursement rate than the AEMD (89%). ED sites were commonly staffed by academic EM faculty (79%) and EM residents (29%). Ninety-six percent of the AEMDs had hired additional faculty; hiring new faculty was considered easy. Academic productivity at AEMDs with added ED sites was reported as unchanged. Reimbursement monies from these ED sites were commonly used for faculty salary support, faculty development, and EM research and residency activities. CONCLUSIONS: Academic EM departments are often affiliated with nonacademic ED sites. These additional sites are commonly staffed by academic EM faculty and EM residents. Academic productivity does not appear to decrease when additional ED sites are added. Reimbursement monies from these ED sites commonly supports academic activities.

Emergency medicine in undergraduate education. SAEM Education Committee, Undergraduate Subcommittee, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Society has a right to expect that all physicians possess basic knowledge of emergency care and the skills to manage acute problems. Competency in the care of acutely ill and injured patients is one of the fundamental exit goals of most medical schools as mandated by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Several groups have called for strengthening the general components of undergraduate medical education, and surveys during the early years of the development of the field of emergency medicine (EM) showed that only a small percentage of schools required significant education in EM. This paper defines the goals and objectives of undergraduate EM education in order to help guide the development of curricular offerings as the role of EM in undergraduate medical school education increases. This paper was developed by the SAEM Education Committee and presents this committee's beliefs on what all graduating medical students should know about assessment and treatment of acutely sick and injured patients. It also suggests methods by which acquisition of this information can occur in medical school education.

Effectiveness of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered triage and trauma team activation protocol.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness, safety, and resource allocation of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered triage and trauma team activation protocol. METHODS: We conducted a 6-month retrospective analysis of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered trauma team activation system at an urban Level I trauma center. Based on prehospital data, patients with a high likelihood of serious injury were assigned to triage category 1 and patients with a low likelihood of serious injury were assigned to category 2. Category 1 patients were immediately evaluated by both emergency medicine and trauma services. Category 2 patients were evaluated initially by emergency medicine staff with a mandatory trauma service consultation. Main outcomes measured included mortality, need for emergency procedures, need for emergency surgery, complications, and discharge disposition. Potential physician-hours saved were calculated for category 2 cases. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one patients were assigned a triage classification (272 to category 1 and 289 to category 2). Category 1 patients had a higher mortality rate (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference of 15.9%, 11.1% to 20.7%, P < .0001), need for emergency surgery (10.7% versus 1.4%, 95% CI for difference of 9.3%, 5.2% to 13.4%; P < .0001), need for emergency procedures (89% of total procedures, 95% CI 83% to 95%; P < .0001), and discharges to rehabilitation facilities (95% CI for difference of 15.1%, 9.3% to 21.0%; P < .0001). The 2-tiered response system saved an estimated 578 physician-hours of time for the trauma service over the study period. CONCLUSION: This evaluation tool effectively predicts likelihood of serious injury, mortality, need for emergency surgery, and need for rehabilitation. Patients with a low likelihood of serious injury may be initially evaluated by the emergency medicine service effectively and safely, thus allowing more efficient use of surgical personnel.

Survey of out-of-hospital emergency intubations in the French prehospital medical system: a multicenter study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical characteristics of endotracheal intubation in the French emergency prehospital medical system and compare these data with those of other systems. METHODS: This study was performed in lle de France (Paris Region) in mobile ICUs staffed by physicians. This prospective, descriptive study involved completion of a questionnaire by the operator just after endotracheal intubation was performed. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-five (99.1%) of 691 consecutive prehospital intubations were performed successfully in the field. The orotracheal route was used in 96.0%, and no surgical approaches such as cricothyroidotomy were used. Mechanical complications occurred in 84 patients, at a rate of 15.9% for nonarrest patients and 8.1% for arrest patients. A wide variety of sedation protocols were used. Difficult intubations (10.8%) were comparable in incidence to the number seen in US emergency departments, not US prehospital systems. By the same token, intubation success rates (99.1%) were comparable to US EDs and much higher than US prehospital results. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of French prehospital airway management differ significantly from those of other countries. These differences may be explained by differences in approach to prehospital management rather than differences of skill.

Atypical chest pain.

The initial approach to patients with a chief complaint of chest pain is to rule out myocardial ischemia. There are, however, other life-threatening causes of chest pain, including pulmonary emobilism and aortic dissection among many others. This article reviews several of these disease processes.

Faculty development in emergency medicine.

Faculty development is an important, multifaceted topic in academic medicine. In this article, academic emergency physicians discuss aspects of faculty development, including: 1) a department chair's method for developing individual faculty members, 2) the traditional university approach to promotion and tenure, 3) faculty development in a new department, and 4) personal development.

Severe rhabdomyolysis with renal failure after intranasal cocaine use.

A case of acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis in a patient who used cocaine on a daily basis is presented. In contrast to many prior reports of renal failure occurring with cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis, our patient did not use intravenous cocaine and did not have any evidence of trauma, seizure, hypotension, hyperthermia, hyperactivity, or coma. His creatine phosphokinase peaked at 448,000 U/liter. He was treated initially with forced diuresis and i.v. furosemide, but he became oliguric, developed pulmonary edema, and required hemodialysis. He recovered fully after 3 weeks of dialysis. The literature is reviewed in an attempt to delineate a rational approach to evaluating cocaine users at risk for rhabdomyolysis.

Emergency medicine journal clubs.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the status of journal club within emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and to describe 3 currently used formats. METHODS: The directors of U.S. Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine (RRC-EM)-approved residency programs were surveyed to determine the features of their programs' journal clubs. Responses to 3 questions assessing the degree of satisfaction (5-item scales from very good to very poor) with the "current format," "resident participation," and "faculty participation" from the survey were grouped according to the program director's impressions of resident and faculty "enjoyment" (2 3-item scales) and whether the journal club is a "success" (3-item scale) to develop an overall satisfaction index. Three journal club formats currently in use at EM residencies are described in detail. RESULTS: Of the 101 directors surveyed, 91 (90%) responded. The respondents' overall satisfaction index was highest when the journal club was held in the evening (p < 0.008) or at a faculty member's home (p < 0.0004). The format of the journal club (e.g., by topic, with a statistical focus, with a research design, focus, or as a clinical practice update) was not associated with the overall satisfaction index. CONCLUSION: Journal clubs associated with EM residencies vary in format and perceived success. The 3 representative journal clubs illustrate different format options.

Evaluation of resident performance and intensive bedside teaching during direct observation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of a residency program in emergency medicine with an intensive observational evaluation of resident performance in the ED. METHODS: Each resident was directly observed and evaluated during a clinical shift four times each academic year: once by each residency codirector and twice by the resident's faculty advisor. The faculty members performed this evaluation outside of "clinical staffing time," shadowing the resident for several hours in the ED during the resident's assigned shift. The resident and assigned faculty member discussed the patients' histories and physical examination findings and developed treatment plans together. Prior to initiation of the observation, the faculty were provided with guidelines for the evaluation of specific skills. Immediate feedback of strengths and deficiencies was provided to the resident. RESULTS: Subjective evaluations by faculty suggest that new insights into resident clinical strengths and weaknesses were determined using this approach. Objective scoring of resident performance demonstrated heterogeneity of skills between residents as well as inconsistency of skills for specific residents. CONCLUSIONS: The program provided the faculty with protected teaching time, an opportunity to share clinical pearls, and unique insights into resident performance that are not obvious during standard clinical interactions.