Long-term efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy combined with different antipsychotic drugs in previously resistant schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: In treatment-resistant schizophrenia a combination of ECT with antipsychotics has been reported to have superior outcomes compared to other strategies, however the results were inconsistent. We investigated the long-term effects of the combination of unilateral, non-dominant hemisphere ECT with three antipsychotics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The clinical study was a naturalistic, prospective, open-labeled, active-controlled study in adult outpatients of both genders suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia with a follow up of 2 years. The patients received sulpiride (n=17, 100-400mg/day, PO), risperidone (n=26, 2-8 mg/day, PO) or olanzapine (n=27, 5-10mg/day, PO). Unilateral ECT was applied in 1 unit (0.5A, 0.8 mS) in six single applications, once a week and further according to the clinical need, in fortnight steps. Clinical efficacy was established using the PANSS and CGI psychometric scales. RESULTS: According to the results, the most effective treatment mode was olanzapine plus ECT, then risperidone plus ECT, while sulpiride plus ECT had lower clinical efficacy. Olanzapine plus ECT was significantly superior in all scale scores vs sulpiride plus ECT, as well as risperidone plus ECT except for PANSS-P (t=1.85, p>0.05). During the study, 38 of 70 patients were withdrawn due to treatment failure (n=21), side effects (n=6) and non-compliance (n=11). CONCLUSION: The combination of novel antipsychotics and ECT can be used safely and effectively in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Effectiveness of clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine in schizophrenia during a five-year period.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of low doses of clozapine in flexible regime in comparison with haloperidol and chlorpromazine in long term. METHOD: The naturalistic study was prospective, active-controlled with 325 adult outpatients of both genders (140 females), with mean year age of 34.8 (range 21-57), suffering from chronic schizophrenia. The first onset of illness was at the mean of 27.9 years (range 17-38), and subjects had the mean year age of 4.1+/-0.5 previous relapses. The patients were allocated to receive haloperidol (105 subjects, dose range 2-15 mg), chlorpromazine (n=105, 100-400 mg) or clozapine (n=115, 75-600 mg). The scores of psychometric instruments (GWB, PANSS, CGI) were regularly assessed during 5 year period. RESULTS: The sixty-six responders were included in per-protocol analysis: 12, 10 and 16 with positive and 7, 6 and 15 with negative schizophrenic syndrome in haloperidol, chlorpromazine and clozapine group, respectively. The statistically significant differences in all psychometric scores was found, for both schizophrenic syndromes, favoring clozapine. The distribution of eighteen different types of adverse events, which we noted, were significantly different among treatment groups ( chi2=315.7, df=34, p<0.001). Clozapine was safer and had fewer adverse effects (average of 0.9 adverse events per patient) than haloperidol (2.7) and chlorpromazine (3.2). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, in low doses of flexible regime, in long term (five years) showed better effectiveness in chronic schizophrenics with positive and negative symptoms than typical antipsychotics.

Effectiveness of clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine in schizophrenia during a five-year period / Eficácia da clozapina, haloperidol e clorpromazina na esquizofrenia em um período de cinco anos

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of low doses of clozapine in flexible regime in comparison with haloperidol and chlorpromazine in long term. METHOD: The naturalistic study was prospective, active-controlled with 325 adult outpatients of both genders (140 females), with mean year age of 34.8 (range 21-57), suffering from chronic schizophrenia. The first onset of illness was at the mean of 27.9 years (range 17-38), and subjects had the mean year age of 4.1±0.5 previous relapses. The patients were allocated to receive haloperidol (105 subjects, dose range 2-15 mg), chlorpromazine (n=105, 100-400 mg) or clozapine (n=115, 75-600 mg). The scores of psychometric instruments (GWB, PANSS, CGI) were regularly assessed during 5 year period. RESULTS: The sixty-six responders were included in per-protocol analysis: 12, 10 and 16 with positive and 7, 6 and 15 with negative schizophrenic syndrome in haloperidol, chlorpromazine and clozapine group, respectively. The statistically significant differences in all psychometric scores was found, for both schizophrenic syndromes, favoring clozapine. The distribution of eighteen different types of adverse events, which we noted, were significantly different among treatment groups ( ÷2=315.7, df=34, p<0.001). Clozapine was safer and had fewer adverse effects (average of 0.9 adverse events per patient) than haloperidol (2.7) and chlorpromazine (3.2). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, in low doses of flexible regime, in long term (five years) showed better effectiveness in chronic schizophrenics with positive and negative symptoms than typical antipsychotics.

OBJETIVO: O propósito deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos de baixas doses de clozapina em regime flexível comparando com o uso de haloperidol e clorpromazina por período de 5 anos. MÉTODO: Um estudo prospectivo naturalístico, ativo-controlado foi realizado com 325 pacientes com idade média de 34,8 (variância 21-57). Todos com diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. No primeiro surto da doença os pacientes apresentavam idade média de 27,9 anos (variância 17-38) e os surtos subsequentes apareceram em média 4,1±0,5 anos após. Os pacientes foram orientados a receberem haloperidol (105 pacientes com dose entre 2 e 15 mg), clorpromazina (105 pacientes com dose entre 100 e 400 mg) e clozapina (115 pacientes com dose entre 75 e 600 mg). Os instrumentos psicométricos utilizados (GWB, PANSS e CGI) foram regularmente empregados durante os 5 anos do estudo. RESULTADOS: Os 66 pacientes respondedores ao tratamento foram incluídos no protocolo de análise: 12, 10 e 16 apresentavam síndrome esquizofrênica positiva e 7, 6 e 15 síndrome negativa esquizofrênica com haloperidol, clorpromazina e clozapina, respectivamente. Diferenças estatísticas significantes foram observadas em todas as avaliações psicométricas em ambas síndromes esquizofrênicas favorecendo a clozapina. A distribuição de 18 tipos de efeitos colaterais observados foi diferente de modo significativo entre os 3 grupos estudados. A clozapina foi a droga que apresentou menos efeitos colaterais. CONCLUSÃO: A clozapina administrada por longo termo em pequenas doses em regime flexível apresenta melhor eficácia nas síndromes esquizofrênicas quando comparada a outras drogas antipsicóticas.