Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 95
Filter
2.
Am J Med ; 137(5): 442-448, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have challenged the reported causal association between acute kidney injury and iodinated contrast administration, ascribing some cases to changes in renal function that are independent of contrast administration. METHODS: We studied 1779 consecutive patients undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC) at a Veterans Administration Medical Center. We compared the incidence of acute kidney injury and of nephropathy at 3 months in veterans undergoing right and left heart catheterization and coronary angiography (R&LHC) to the incidence of acute kidney injury and of nephropathy at 3 months in patients undergoing RHC only. RESULTS: The incidence of acute kidney injury at 3 days was 47 (9.7%) in the R&LHC group and 58 (9.6%) in the RHC group (P = .99). The incidence of nephropathy at 3 months was 115 (17%) in the L&RHC group and 141 (19.2%) in the RHC group (P = 0.31). In a propensity score-paired analysis of 782 patients and after adjustment for baseline characteristics, the odds ratio for acute kidney injury at 3 days among patients undergoing R&LHC was 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-2.42; P = .50), and the odds ratio for nephropathy at 3 months was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.04; P = .08). CONCLUSION: The incidence of changes in creatinine consistent with acute kidney injury at 3 days and of nephropathy at 3 months was not significantly different in patients undergoing R&LHC compared with patients undergoing RHC only. This supports the thesis that not all changes in creatinine after procedures involving administration of contrast are caused by the contrast.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Cardiac Catheterization , Contrast Media , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Male , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Incidence , Retrospective Studies
4.
Heart Views ; 24(1): 41-49, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37124437

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most prevalent cardiovascular disease characterized by atherosclerotic plaque buildup that can lead to partial or full obstruction of blood flow in the coronary arteries. Treatment for CAD involves a combination of lifestyle changes, pharmacologic therapy, and modern revascularization procedures. Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (or beta-blockers) have been widely used for decades as a key therapy for CAD. In this review, prior studies are examined to better understand beta-adrenoceptor antagonist use in patients with acute coronary syndrome, stable coronary heart disease, and in the perioperative setting. The evidence for the benefit of beta-blocker therapy is well established for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but it diminishes as the time from the index cardiac event elapses. The evidence for benefit in the perioperative setting is not strong.

5.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 32(1): 51-57, 2023 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients undergoing liver transplantation often have significant cardiovascular risk factors and may experience cardiac-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes in this population, and to identify factors predictive of post-transplant cardiac morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We studied 261 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a single Veterans' Affairs Medical center between 1997 and 2015 to evaluate new cardiovascular events post-transplantation. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 261 patients (253 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 58.3 (± 6.5 years), mean model for end-stage liver disease score of 18.0 (±7.2), and mean Framingham risk score of 8.1 (± 4.9). After a median follow-up of 82 months a total of 75 (28.7%) patients died, with 13 deaths (17.3%) attributed to a primary cardiovascular event and 9 (12%) deaths due to a coronary-specific event. Coronary events and/ or the need for revascularization post-transplant occurred in 24 (9.2%) patients. The strongest pre-transplant predictors of mortality were age (p=0.01), Framingham risk score (p=0.01), preexisting coronary artery disease (p=0.01), and preexisting dyslipidemia (p=0.01). The strongest post-transplant predictors of mortality were new-onset hypertension (p=0.01) and new-onset diabetes mellitus (p=0.03) post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of veterans, coronary artery disease was significantly associated with mortality in the post liver transplantation population; however, the majority of deaths after transplant were attributable to other causes.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronary Artery Disease , End Stage Liver Disease , Liver Transplantation , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , End Stage Liver Disease/diagnosis , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies
6.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 37(4): 793-806, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34652581

ABSTRACT

The coexistence of cardiovascular disease and erectile dysfunction is widespread, possibly owing to underlying endothelial dysfunction in both diseases. Millions of patients with cardiovascular disease are prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors for the management of erectile dysfunction. Although the role of PDE5 inhibitors in erectile dysfunction therapy is well established, their effects on the cardiovascular system are unclear. Preclinical studies investigating the effect of PDE5 inhibitors on ischemia-reperfusion injury, pressure overload-induced hypertrophy, and chemotoxicity suggested a possible clinical role for each of these medications; however, attempts to translate these findings to the bedside have resulted in mixed outcomes. In this review, we explore the biologic preclinical effects of PDE5 inhibitors in mediating cardioprotection. We then examine clinical trials investigating PDE5 inhibition in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and ventricular arrhythmias and discuss why the studies likely have yet to show positive results and efficacy with PDE5 inhibition despite no safety concerns.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Erectile Dysfunction , Male , Humans , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5/therapeutic use , Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Heart
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(1): 85-93, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35500170

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether contrast media type is associated with outcomes in veterans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the impact of iso-osmolar contrast medium (IOCM) versus low-osmolar contrast medium (LOCM) on acute kidney injury (AKI) and other major adverse renal or cardiovascular events (MARCE) after PCI. We assessed the association between contrast media type and MARCE in patients who underwent PCI within the Veterans Administration Healthcare System. METHODS: We reviewed PCIs performed between 2009 and 2019 using data from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The primary endpoint was MARCE, a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, AKI, and dialysis onset at 30 days. RESULTS: The analysis cohort consisted of 50,389 patients of whom 25,555 received LOCM and 24,834 received IOCM. There was significant variation in contrast type across sites. After adjustment for comorbidities, no significant association between contrast media type and MARCE was observed in both site-unadjusted (odds ratio [OR] for IOCM: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08; p = 0.97) and site-adjusted (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.95-1.18; p = 0.30) analyses. Similar results were obtained when contrast volume was imputed or the data was subset to individuals with available contrast volume. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of veterans undergoing PCI, we found considerable site variation in the type of contrast media used but no significant association between contrast media type and the incidence of MARCE, both before and after adjustment for the site.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Stroke/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Veterans Health Services
11.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol ; 42(5): 553-564, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35296151

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Acute coronary syndrome as a first presentation is common and patients with established disease have a high rate of recurrent ischemic events, despite antiplatelet therapy. Over the past several years, direct oral anticoagulants have become available and have been studied in patients with coronary artery disease. These medications directly inhibit either thrombin or factor Xa which contribute to atherothrombosis. This review will summarize the clinical data regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in different patient populations with coronary disease and the balance between protection against ischemia and bleeding. Additionally, the review will summarize the available data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants periprocedurally in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The future direction of coronary artery disease and the role of direct oral anticoagulants will rely on further studies determining the optimal combination of antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant regimens that derive ischemic benefit without increased rates of bleeding. Additional upstream blockade of the coagulation cascade with factor XIIa and factor XIa inhibitors may also improve treatment in the future.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects
12.
Am J Med ; 135(5): 572-575, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861196

ABSTRACT

Patients presenting to the emergency department with consideration of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are risk-stratified with sensitive troponin assays. Among many patients who present with symptoms other than chest pain, they are admitted for observation if the troponin assay is above the upper reference limit of that specific assay. With the advent of high-sensitivity troponin assays, it is estimated that the prevalence of admissions for secondary myocardial infarctions, termed type 2 myocardial infarctions and myocardial injury, will increase by 100%. This is a heterogeneous population, and although adverse outcomes such as readmission and death are high, outcome-based therapies with guideline-directed treatments have not been advanced in this subset. As such, the clinician is often confused about the optimal treatment at hospital discharge. More studies should address the value of specific known therapies in this cohort that have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with an acute coronary syndrome or type 1 myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Myocardial Infarction , Troponin , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Biomarkers , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Troponin/blood
14.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 40: 163-171, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34952824

ABSTRACT

The transradial approach for cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and percutaneous intervention is associated with a lower risk of access site-related complications compared to the transfemoral approach. However, with increasing utilization of transradial access for not only coronary procedures but also peripheral vascular procedures, healthcare personnel are more likely to encounter radial access site complications, which can be associated with morbidity and mortality. There is significant heterogeneity in the reporting of incidence, manifestations, and management of radial access site complications, at least partly due to vague presentation and under-diagnosis. Therefore, physicians performing procedures via transradial access should be aware of possible complications and remain vigilant to prevent their occurrence. Intraprocedural complications of transradial access procedures, which include spasm, catheter kinking, and arterial dissection or perforation, may lead to patient discomfort, increased procedure time, and a higher rate of access site cross over. Post-procedural complications such as radial artery occlusion, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or nerve injury could lead to patient discomfort and limb dysfunction. When radial access site complications occur, comprehensive evaluation and prompt treatment is necessary to reduce long-term consequences. In this report, we review the incidence, clinical factors, and management strategies for radial access site complications associated with cardiac catheterization.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False , Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Radial Artery/injuries
15.
Aorta (Stamford) ; 9(4): 169-170, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861741

ABSTRACT

Statins may be associated with improved outcomes in patient with thoracic aortic aneurysms but there is little data on the role of statins in patients who have undergone thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

17.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(6): 1133-1137, 2021 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989459

ABSTRACT

Transradial access of the vascular system for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention has become the primary approach in several cardiac catheterization laboratories across the world. The paradigm shift from transfemoral access has been driven by improved outcomes in patients undergoing these cardiac procedures by transradial access. Radial artery occlusion is the most common vascular complication of transradial coronary procedures. Only a few studies have reported on the optimal treatment of radial artery occlusion, with ulnar artery compression and anticoagulation, especially with low-molecular-weight heparin, having shown the best results. In this case series, four patients who were found to have evidence of post-cardiac catheterization radial artery occlusion on ultrasound imaging were treated with a 30-day course of apixaban. Three of the four patients showed complete resolution of radial artery occlusion with addition of apixaban to current standard therapeutic strategies. This case series shows that treatment with novel oral anticoagulants can be an alternative and more convenient option compared to subcutaneous injection of low-molecular heparin for anticoagulation in patients with post-coronary angiography radial artery occlusion.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Radial Artery , Anticoagulants , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Ulnar Artery
18.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs ; 21(5): 487-497, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369717

ABSTRACT

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury has multiple definitions, but is generally described as worsening renal function after administration of iodinated contrast media. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and poor long-term survival. Furthermore, patients undergoing coronary angiography commonly have comorbidities such as hypertension or congestive heart failure, which are often treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Trials assessing the effects of these renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents on the subsequent development of contrast-associated acute kidney injury have shown conflicting data, suggesting both beneficial and harmful effects. Therefore, there are no clear guidelines on whether clinicians should discontinue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents peri-procedurally. In this article, we review the data from trials assessing the effects of peri-procedural renin-angiotensin system-blocking agent use in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral angiography and intervention. Future studies will likely focus on the extent of damage or potential benefit of these agents on renal function, cardiac function, as well as morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prior to coronary angiography.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , Coronary Angiography , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Humans
19.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 69(1): 97-99, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409914

ABSTRACT

The Starr-Edwards ball and cage valves were among the first and most commonly used mechanical valve devices. These valves offered a novel design that would become one of the mainstays for replacement of severely diseased heart valves in the early second half of the twentieth century. We describe the case of a patient with a Starr-Edwards ball and cage valve in the aortic position that was replaced 40 years earlier who was admitted with concerns for symptoms of new volume overload. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a functional mechanical aortic valve with no evidence of compromise. The patient was treated with diuretics for congestive heart failure exacerbation and on 3 years follow-up was doing well. This is one of the few cases reported of a patient with Starr-Edwards ball and cage aortic valve functioning normally extending into the fifth decade without signs of significant instability.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Adult , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Prosthesis Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...