Safety and immunogenicity of a 4-component GMMA-based Shigella vaccine in healthy European adults: Stage 1 of a randomized, controlled phase I/II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We report data from Stage 1 of an ongoing two-staged, phase I/II randomized clinical trial (NCT05073003) with a 4-component Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens-based vaccine against Shigella sonnei and S. flexneri 1b, 2a and 3a (altSonflex1-2-3, GSK). METHODS: 18-50-year-old Europeans (N=102) were randomized (2:1) to receive two injections of altSonflex1-2-3 or placebo at 3- or 6-month interval. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed at pre-specified timepoints. RESULTS: The most common solicited administration-site event (until 7 days post-each injection) and unsolicited adverse event (until 28 days post-each injection) were pain (altSonflex1-2-3: 97.1%; Placebo: 58.8%) and headache (32.4%; 23.5%), respectively. All serotype-specific functional IgG antibodies peaked 14-28 days post-injection 1 and remained substantially higher than pre-vaccination at 3 or 6 months post-vaccination; the second injection did not boost but restored the initial immune response. The highest seroresponse rates (≥4-fold increase in titers over baseline) were obtained against S. flexneri 2a (ELISA: post-injection 1: 91.0%; post-injection 2 [Day {D}113; D197]: 100%; 97.0%; serum bactericidal activity (SBA): post-injection 1: 94.4%; post-injection 2: 85.7%; 88.9%) followed by S. sonnei (ELISA: post-injection 1: 77.6%; post-injection 2: 84.6%; 78.8%; SBA: post-injection 1: 83.3%; post-injection 2: 71.4%; 88.9%). Immune responses against S. flexneri 1b and S. flexneri 3a, as measured by both ELISA and SBA, were numerically lower compared to those against S. sonnei and S. flexneri 2a. CONCLUSIONS: No safety signals or concerns were identified. altSonflex1-2-3 induced functional serotype-specific immune responses, allowing further clinical development in the target population.

What is the context? Shigella bacteria cause severe and often bloody diarrhea, called shigellosis, that affects mostly young children and can be life-threatening. Shigellosis is particularly common in low- and middle-income countries due to inadequate sanitation and limited access to healthcare. Since the immune response to Shigella is serotype-specific, an ideal vaccine should include multiple Shigella serotypes to ensure broad protection. What is new? We developed a novel vaccine against Shigella that includes Shigella sonnei and three prevalent Shigella flexneri serotypes. In Stage 1 (phase I) of the study, healthy European adults received two vaccine injections given 3 or 6 months apart. We found that: The vaccine was well tolerated, and no safety signals or concerns were identified.Regardless of the interval between injections, specific antibodies were elicited against all four Shigella serotypes, with highest levels against Shigella flexneri 2a and Shigella sonnei.Functional antibody levels peaked after the first injection, remaining higher than the baseline up to 6 months. A second injection did not boost responses but restored functional antibody levels to those after the first injection. What is the impact? The vaccine can now be tested in Stage 2 (phase II) of the study in Africa, a region highly affected by shigellosis.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating Study Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Epitope-Specific Chemically Defined Nanoparticle RSV Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: V-306 is a virus-like particle-based vaccine candidate displaying respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F site II protein mimetics (FsIIm) as an antigenic epitope. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalating, first-in-human study, conducted in 60 women aged 18-45 years. Twenty subjects per cohort (15 vaccine and five placebo) received two V-306 intramuscular administrations on Days 0 and 56 at 15 µg, 50 µg, or 150 µg. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed after each vaccination and for 1 year in total. RESULTS: V-306 was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, with no increase in reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events between the first and second administrations. At 50 µg and 150 µg, V-306 induced an increase in FsIIm-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers, which lasted at least 4 months. This did not translate into an increase in RSV-neutralizing antibody titers, which were already high at baseline. No increase in the anti-F protein-specific IgG titers was observed, which were also high in most subjects at baseline due to past natural infections. CONCLUSIONS: V-306 was safe and well-tolerated. Future modifications of the vaccine and assay conditions will likely improve the results of vaccination.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a plant-produced, bivalent, recombinant norovirus-like particle vaccine.

Noroviruses (NoV) are the leading cause of epidemic acute gastroenteritis in humans worldwide and a safe and effective vaccine is needed. Here, a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed in 60 healthy adults, 18 to 40 years old. Safety (primary objective) and immunogenicity (secondary and exploratory objectives) of a bivalent (GI.4 and GII.4), plant-produced, virus-like particle (VLP), NoV vaccine candidate formulation were investigated at two dose levels (50 µg + 50 µg and 150 µg + 150 µg) without adjuvant. Overall, 13 subjects (65.0%) in the 50 µg group, 16 subjects (80.0%) in the 150 µg group, and 14 subjects (70.0%) in the placebo group reported at least 1 solicited local or general symptom during the 7-day post-vaccination periods following each dose. Severe solicited adverse events (AEs) were rare (2 events in the 50 µg group). A total of 8 subjects (40.0%) in each group reported at least one unsolicited AE during the 28-day post-vaccination periods. Immunogenicity was assessed on days 1, 8, 29, 57, 183 and 365. All subjects were pre-exposed to norovirus as indicated by baseline levels of the different immunological parameters examined. Vaccine-specific humoral and cellular immune responses increased after the first dose but did not rise further after the second vaccination. Increased GI.4- and GII.4-specific IgG titers persisted until day 365. The vaccine elicited cross-reactive IgG antibodies against non-vaccine NoV VLPs, which was more pronounced for NoV strains of the same genotype as the GII.4 vaccine strain than for non-vaccine genotypes. Significant blocking anti-GI.4 and anti-GII.4 VLP titers were triggered in both dose groups. Lymphoproliferation assays revealed strong cell-mediated immune responses that persisted until day 365. In conclusion, both dose levels were safe and well-tolerated, and no higher incidence of AEs was observed in the higher dose group. The data show that a single dose of the vaccine formulated at 50 µg of each VLP is sufficient to reach a peak immune response after 8 to 28 days. The results of this Phase I study warrant further evaluation of the non-adjuvanted vaccine candidate. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT05508178, identifier (NCT05508178).

The role of cell-mediated immunity against influenza and its implications for vaccine evaluation.

Influenza vaccines remain the most effective tools to prevent flu and its complications. Trivalent or quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines primarily elicit antibodies towards haemagglutinin and neuraminidase. These vaccines fail to induce high protective efficacy, in particular in older adults and immunocompromised individuals and require annual updates to keep up with evolving influenza strains (antigenic drift). Vaccine efficacy declines when there is a mismatch between its content and circulating strains. Current correlates of protection are merely based on serological parameters determined by haemagglutination inhibition or single radial haemolysis assays. However, there is ample evidence showing that these serological correlates of protection can both over- or underestimate the protective efficacy of influenza vaccines. Next-generation universal influenza vaccines that induce cross-reactive cellular immune responses (CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cell responses) against conserved epitopes may overcome some of the shortcomings of the current inactivated vaccines by eliciting broader protection that lasts for several influenza seasons and potentially enhances pandemic preparedness. Assessment of cellular immune responses in clinical trials that evaluate the immunogenicity of these new generation vaccines is thus of utmost importance. Moreover, studies are needed to examine whether these cross-reactive cellular immune responses can be considered as new or complementary correlates of protection in the evaluation of traditional and next-generation influenza vaccines. An overview of the assays that can be applied to measure cell-mediated immune responses to influenza with their strengths and weaknesses is provided here.