Clinical significance of the C2 slope after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The C2 slope (C2S) is one of the parameters that can determine cervical sagittal alignment, but its clinical significance is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the C2S after multilevel cervical spine fusion. METHODS: A total of 111 patients who underwent multilevel cervical spine fusion were included in this study. The C2S, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2-7 lordosis, and T1 slope (T1S) were measured in standing lateral cervical spine radiographs preoperatively and 2 years after the surgery. Clinical outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and patient-reported subjective improvement rate (IR) percentage. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired-samples t-test and Pearson's correlation, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of C2S. RESULTS: C2S demonstrated a significant correlation with the cSVA, C2-7 lordosis, T1S, and T1S minus cervical lordosis. C2S revealed a significant correlation with the JOA, neck pain VAS, and NDI scores at 2 years after surgery. Change in the C2S correlated with postoperative neck pain and NDI scores. ROC curves demonstrated the cutoff values of C2S as 18.8°, 22.25°, and 25.35°, according to a cSVA of 40 mm, severe disability expressed by NDI, and severe myelopathy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: C2S can be an additional cervical sagittal alignment parameter that can be a useful prognostic factor after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

Relation between diameter of a lateral screw and pull-out strength in distal clavicle fracture in plates with different geometry: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Plate fixation has recently gained popularity among the various surgical methods used to treat Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. The use of a low-profile distal clavicle locking plate is logically considered a better option when there is no significant difference in the fixation strength between insertions of 3.5- and 2.7-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate any differences in fixation strength among varying sizes of screws that are used to treat distal clavicle fractures. The study was performed with 20 paired shoulder girdles from 10 fresh frozen cadavers. To create a type IIA fracture of Neer classification, osteotomy was performed perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the clavicle at the medial end point of the conoid ligament. Two custom-made fixtures designed to be attached to both upper and lower sides of the Instron were fabricated for the evaluation. The mean maximum pull-out strength for fixation using 3.5-mm diameter screws was 241.9 ± 67.8 N, whereas the mean pull-out strength in fixation with 2.7-mm diameter screws was 228.1 ± 63.0 N. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Distal fragment fixation with distal clavicle locking plates using two 2.7-mm diameter screws showed comparable biomechanical pull-out strength at the time-zero setting to fixations with a hook plate using two 3.5-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the fixation of the distal fragment with a low-profile plate and 2.7-mm screws may be preferred as an alternative option if the distal fragment of the fractured clavicle is not extremely small.