Clinical, Functional, and Nutritional Efficacy of a Glutamine-Enriched Oligomeric Diet in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

AIMS: This work aims to evaluate the efficacy of nutritional supplementation with a glutamine-enriched oligomeric diet (GEOD) compared to a standard polymeric diet (SPD) in terms of oncology treatment-related diarrhea (OTRD) (frequency and consistency of stools), gastrointestinal toxicity, and functional and nutritional progress. METHODS: This prospective cohort study compared two groups of patients with rectal cancer in treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy who were at risk of malnutrition. Patients were randomized to receive either 400 ml of GEOD or of SPD from the start of radiotherapy to 30 days after its completion. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited, 40 per arm. The GEOD arm had improved stool consistency and a greater reduction in the number of stools compared to the SPD arm (p < 0.001). The relative risk (RR) of developing diarrhea in the GEOD arm was 0.059 (95% CI 0.015-0.229). There was a reduced risk of developing intestinal mucositis in the GEOD arm compared to the SPD arm [RR 0.202 (95% CI 0.102 - 0.399)]. The GEOD arm had greater improvements in functional and nutritional status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GEOD had a protective effect in terms of the development of gastrointestinal toxicity associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment in patients with rectal cancer.

Triptófano como suplemento dietético y tratamiento de los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio en el cáncer / L-tryptophan as dietetic supplement and treatment for hot flashes, astenia, and insomnia in cancer patients

Introducción: tanto en las mujeres con cáncer de mama y cáncer ginecológico como en los hombres con carcinoma prostático, los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio son síntomas frecuentes y molestos que alteran la calidad de vida. Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia del aporte de triptófano como tratamiento de los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio en pacientes con cáncer de próstata, de mama y cervicouterino. Materiales y métodos: estudio de intervención sin grupo de control en el Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica del HUCA, en el período de julio de 2018 a julio de 2019. Se incluyeron en total 60 pacientes con cáncer de próstata, de mama y cervicouterino que habían recibido tratamiento con radioterapia y hormonoterapia, y que presentaban sofocos, astenia e insomnio. Se administraron 3 g de L-triptófano al día. Resultados: se reportan un aumento significativo del valor del triptófano sérico al final del estudio (p < 0,001) y una disminución significativa de las puntuaciones de los síntomas estudiados; aunque no hemos hallado ninguna significación estadística entre ellos, sí se aprecia una mejoría significativa de cada uno de los síntomas, así como una mejoría de la calidad de vida (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: el estudio actual sugiere que, en los pacientes con cáncer de mama, de próstata o cervicouterino y síntomas de sofocos, astenia e insomnio, el aporte de triptófano como suplemento nutricional se tolera bien, mejora la calidad de vida y puede asociarse a una mejoría de los valores obtenidos en las escalas de los síntomas referidos, aunque no se demuestra ninguna relación estadísticamente significativa con la elevación del triptófano en sangre. (AU)

Introduction: in women with breast cancer and gynecologic cancer, as well as in men with prostate carcinoma, hot flashes, asthenia, and insomnia are common and bothersome symptoms that impair quality of life. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of tryptophan intake as a treatment for hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia in patients with prostate, breast, and uterine cervical cancer. Materials and methods: intervention study without a control group at the HUCA Radiation Oncology Service, from July 2018 to July 2019. A total of 60 patients with prostate, breast, or uterine cervical cancer who had received treatment with radiotherapy and hormone therapy, and who presented with hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia were included. L-tryptophan was administered at a dose of 3 g per day. Results: a significant increase in serum tryptophan levels at the end of the study (p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in the scores of the study symptoms were reported. Although statistical significance was not found, a significant improvement in each symptom was observed, as well as an improvement in quality of life (p < 0.001). Conclusions: the study suggests that, in patients with breast, prostate, or uterine cervical cancer, and symptoms such as hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia, the administration of tryptophan as a nutritional supplement is well tolerated, improves quality of life, and is associated with improvement in the scale scores of the symptoms of interest, although no statistically significant relationship with increased blood tryptophan levels was found. (AU)

[L-tryptophan as dietetic supplement and treatment for hot flashes, astenia, and insomnia in cancer patients]. / Triptófano como suplemento dietético y tratamiento de los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio en el cáncer.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: in women with breast cancer and gynecologic cancer, as well as in men with prostate carcinoma, hot flashes, asthenia, and insomnia are common and bothersome symptoms that impair quality of life. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of tryptophan intake as a treatment for hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia in patients with prostate, breast, and uterine cervical cancer. Materials and methods: intervention study without a control group at the HUCA Radiation Oncology Service, from July 2018 to July 2019. A total of 60 patients with prostate, breast, or uterine cervical cancer who had received treatment with radiotherapy and hormone therapy, and who presented with hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia were included. L-tryptophan was administered at a dose of 3 g per day. Results: a significant increase in serum tryptophan levels at the end of the study (p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in the scores of the study symptoms were reported. Although statistical significance was not found, a significant improvement in each symptom was observed, as well as an improvement in quality of life (p < 0.001). Conclusions: the study suggests that, in patients with breast, prostate, or uterine cervical cancer, and symptoms such as hot flushes, asthenia, and insomnia, the administration of tryptophan as a nutritional supplement is well tolerated, improves quality of life, and is associated with improvement in the scale scores of the symptoms of interest, although no statistically significant relationship with increased blood tryptophan levels was found.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: tanto en las mujeres con cáncer de mama y cáncer ginecológico como en los hombres con carcinoma prostático, los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio son síntomas frecuentes y molestos que alteran la calidad de vida. Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia del aporte de triptófano como tratamiento de los sofocos, la astenia y el insomnio en pacientes con cáncer de próstata, de mama y cervicouterino. Materiales y métodos: estudio de intervención sin grupo de control en el Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica del HUCA, en el período de julio de 2018 a julio de 2019. Se incluyeron en total 60 pacientes con cáncer de próstata, de mama y cervicouterino que habían recibido tratamiento con radioterapia y hormonoterapia, y que presentaban sofocos, astenia e insomnio. Se administraron 3 g de L-triptófano al día. Resultados: se reportan un aumento significativo del valor del triptófano sérico al final del estudio (p < 0,001) y una disminución significativa de las puntuaciones de los síntomas estudiados; aunque no hemos hallado ninguna significación estadística entre ellos, sí se aprecia una mejoría significativa de cada uno de los síntomas, así como una mejoría de la calidad de vida (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: el estudio actual sugiere que, en los pacientes con cáncer de mama, de próstata o cervicouterino y síntomas de sofocos, astenia e insomnio, el aporte de triptófano como suplemento nutricional se tolera bien, mejora la calidad de vida y puede asociarse a una mejoría de los valores obtenidos en las escalas de los síntomas referidos, aunque no se demuestra ninguna relación estadísticamente significativa con la elevación del triptófano en sangre.

OPTimizing Irradiation through Molecular Assessment of Lymph node (OPTIMAL): a randomized open label trial.

BACKGROUND: Conservative surgery followed by breast and nodal irradiation is the standard loco-regional early breast cancer (BC) treatment for patients with four or more involved lymph nodes. However, the treatment strategy when fewer nodes are involved remains unclear, especially when lymphadenectomy has not been performed. Sensitive nodal status assessment molecular techniques as the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) assay can contribute to the definition and standardization of the treatment strategy. Therefore, the OPTIMAL study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of incidental irradiation of axillary nodes in patients with early-stage BC and limited involvement of the SLN. METHODS: BC patients who underwent conservative surgery and whose SLN total tumour load assessed with OSNA ranged between 250-15,000 copies/µL will be eligible. Patients will be randomized to receive irradiation on the breast, tumour bed, axillary and supraclavicular lymph node areas (intentional arm) or only on the breast and tumour bed (incidental arm). All areas, including the internal mammary chain, will be contoured. The mean, median, D5% and D95% doses received in all volumes will be calculated. The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority of the incidental irradiation of axillary nodes compared to the intentional irradiation in terms of 5-year disease free survival. Secondary endpoints comprise the comparison of acute and chronic toxicity and loco-regional and distant disease recurrence rates. DISCUSSION: Standardizing the treatment and diagnosis of BC patients with few nodes affected is crucial due to the lack of consensus. Hence, the quantitative score for the metastatic burden of SLN provided by OSNA can contribute by improving the discrimination of which BC patients with limited nodal involvement can benefit from incidental radiation as an adjuvant treatment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02335957; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02335957.

Extreme weekly hypofractionation in breast cancer in elderly.

Breast cancer is the second cause of cancer death worldwide. One-half of new cases are diagnosed in elderly patients, with a growing global life expectancy and with age being a major risk factor for breast cancer. Radiation therapy is one of the main treatments as adjuvant treatment whenever possible and as definitive if not. Daily conventional fractionation over 5 weeks is costly and lengthy, and alternatively weekly hypofractionation could be a good option in elderly patients with comorbidities, social problems and who live far from the treatment center. The purpose of this article is to review weekly hypofractionated schedules in elderly patients published in literature, in terms of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and side effects. There are eleven studies on the topic with different treatment schedules, 87.1% of lesions were adjuvant treatments and 12.9% definitive treatments, with a range of LRRs between 0% and 16% depending on several factors. The number of acute side effects as grade 3 or grade 4 was very low, being less than 15% in all series. The most significant late side effect was fibrosis in a range between 15.1% and 39.2%. Extreme weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy seems to be a safe treatment without significant side effects.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience.

INTRODUCTION: It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

Técnica de planificación intraoperatoria en braquiterapia prostática con implantes permanentes de 125I ó 103Pd / Intraoperative planning technique for 125I or 103Pd permanent seeds prostatic branchytherapy

Objetivo: La Braquiterapia prostática con implantes permanentes de semillas de 125I ó 103Pd es una opción terapéutica en el tratamiento del cáncer prostático organoconfinado. Analizamos la técnica basada en la planificación previa (preplanificación), así como nuestro proceder actual de planificación intraoperatoria y los motivos que nos llevaron a realizar este cambio de técnica. Métodos: Los cambios observados en el volumen y en la localización espacial de la próstata, entre las imágenes obtenidas durante la preplanificación y posteriormente en el acto quirúrgico, junto a la posibilidad de dificultades para implantar las semillas por interferencia con el arco púbico, son algunos de los motivos que nos llevaron al cambio de técnica. Resultados: Previamente a la intervención calculamos el volumen prostático por ecografía transrectal; con este dato determinamos la actividad total del implante siguiendo el nomograma de Wu y cols y la actividad por semilla, por lo tanto se trata de un proceso individualizado para cada paciente. Realizamos un implante periférico situando el 75-80 por ciento de las semillas en la zona periférica de la próstata, habitualmente a través de 12-15 agujas, el resto de semillas se sitúan en la parte central de la próstata utilizando 3 ó 4 agujas como máximo, en próstatas voluminosas. El día de la intervención, tras posicionar al paciente y sondarle, comprobamos de nuevo la volumetría, transferimos las imágenes ecográficas (cada 5 cm. de base de apex) al planificador, donde se halla la distribución idónea de las semillas. Posteriormente realizamos el implante colocando la totalidad de las agujas sin cargar y, tras realizar una cistoscopia flexible para asegurarnos de que ninguna de las agujas estén en uretra o vejiga, realizamos una postplanificación intraoperatoria que nos permita comprobar la precisión del implante. Finalizaremos con la colocación de las semillas en el interior de la próstata. El tiempo total del proceso es de más o menos 90 minutos. Conclusión: La planificación intraoperatoria es un paso más en el tratamiento de los tumores prostáticos con braquiterapia de implantes permanentes, que evita las desventajas de la preplanificación y mejora la cobertura del tumor por las dosis ideales de irradiación, lo que se traducirá en un mejor control local de la enfermedad (AU)

[Technique of intraoperative planning in prostatic brachytherapy with permanent implants of 125I or 103Pd]. / Técnica de planificación intraoperatoria en braquiterapia prostática con implantes permanentes de 125I ó 103Pd.

OBJECTIVES: Prostatic brachytherapy with permanent 125I or 123Pd seeds implantation is a therapeutic option for organ-confined prostate cancer. We analyze the technique based on previous planning, our current intraoperative planning procedure and the reasons that moved us to introduce this change. METHODS: Changes in prostate volume and spatial localization observed between previous planning and intraoperative images, and possible difficulties for seed implantation due to pubic arch interference are some of the reasons that induce us to change technique. RESULTS: Before the operation, we calculate the prostatic volume by transrectal ultrasound; with this information we determine the total implant activity following Wu's nomogram, and per-seed activity; therefore, it is an individual process for each patient. We perform a peripheral implant, placing 75-80% of the seeds within the peripheral prostatic zone, generally through 12-15 needles, the rest of the seeds are placed in the central prostatic zone using a maximum of 3-4 needles in high volume prostates. The day of intervention, after positioning and catheter insertion, volumetry is re-checked. Ultrasound images (from base to apex every 5 mm) are transferred to the planner were a suitable seed distribution is determined. Implantation is then performed placing all needles unloaded, and then intraoperative post-planning to allow us to check implant precision is performed after cistoscopically check that there is no urethral or bladder penetration by any needle. We finish with the insertion of seeds into the prostate. Total time for the procedure is around 90 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative planning is an additional step for the treatment of prostate cancer with permanent seeds brachytherapy, which avoids the disadvantages of previous planning and improves tumor inclusion in the ideal irradiation dose area, which will translate into better local disease control.