Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 61(2): 195-206, 2001 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11137285

ABSTRACT

This study documents the costs of heroin addiction in the United States, both to the addict and society at large. Using a cost-of-illness approach, costs were estimated in four broad areas: medical care, lost productivity, crime, and social welfare. We estimate that the cost of heroin addiction in the United States was US$21.9 billion in 1996. Of these costs, productivity losses accounted for approximately US$11.5 billion (53%), criminal activities US$5.2 billion (24%), medical care US$5.0 billion (23%), and social welfare US$0.1 billion (0.5%). The large economic burden resulting from heroin addiction highlights the importance of investment in prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Heroin Dependence/economics , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Female , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Workplace/economics
3.
Am J Manag Care ; 4(10): 1450-60, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10338737

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To design a decision analytic model to help determine the costs associated with various treatment regimens for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytic model incorporating Markov processes was developed to calculate clinical and direct economic outcomes for patients with GERD after 2 years of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used retrospective data in the Markov model to generate clinical and economic outcomes. The primary data sources were the 1993 MarketScan claims database, the 1992 National Hospital Discharge Survey, and the clinical literature. RESULTS: Patients with mild GERD (17.6% of patients) contributed 37.8% of costs, while those with moderate to severe disease (14.4% of patients) contributed 49.9% of costs. The remaining 12.3% of costs was spent on the 68% of patients with non-GERD diagnoses. The class of drugs with the highest acquisition cost--proton pump inhibitors--had the lowest total cost per case. The high level of efficacy of these drugs may explain this result. Sensitivity testing showed no evidence that our model's results depended heavily on any one probability or cost factor. CONCLUSIONS: This model showed that patients with moderate to severe GERD were the most expensive cases to treat and that proton pump inhibitors resulted in the lowest total cost per case. Further testing and manipulation of the model are required to gain a better understanding of the trade-offs involved in different options for GERD management.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Decision Support Techniques , Gastroesophageal Reflux/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Cost Allocation/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Humans , Markov Chains , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...