Different probiotic strains alter human cord blood monocyte responses.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics have a protective effect on various diseases. In neonatology, they are predominantly used to prevent necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), a severe inflammatory disease of the neonatal intestine. The mechanisms by which probiotics act are diverse; little is known about their direct effect on neonatal immune cells. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the effect of probiotics on the functions of neonatal monocytes in an in vitro model using three different strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR), Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) and Bifidobacterium bifidum (BB)) and mononuclear cells isolated from cord blood. RESULTS: We show that stimulation with LR induces proinflammatory effects in neonatal monocytes, such as increased expression of surface molecules involved in monocyte activation, increased production of pro-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines and increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Similar effects were observed when monocytes were stimulated simultaneously with LPS. Stimulation with LA and BB alone or in combination also induced cytokine production in monocytes, with BB showing the least effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that probiotics increase the defence functions of neonatal monocytes and thus possibly favourably influence the newborn's ability to fight infections. IMPACT: Probiotics induce a proinflammatory response in neonatal monocytes in vitro. This is a previously unknown mechanism of how probiotics modulate the immune response of newborns. Probiotic application to neonates may increase their ability to fight off infections.

The association between intraoperative cell salvage and red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery - an observational study in a patient blood management centre.

INTRODUCTION: Cell salvage (CS) is an integral part of patient blood management (PBM) and aims to reduce allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational study analysed patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between November 2015 and October 2018. Patients were divided into a CS group (patients receiving CS) and a control group (no CS). Primary endpoints were the number of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusions and the number of RBC units transfused per patient. RESULTS: A total of 704 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were analysed, of whom 338 underwent surgery with CS (CS group) and 366 were without CS (control group). Intraoperatively, 152 patients (45%) were exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusions in the CS group and 93 patients (25%) in the control group (P < 0.001). Considering the amount of intraoperative blood loss, regression analysis revealed a significant association between blood loss and increased use of RBC units in patients of the control compared to the CS group (1000 mL: 1.0 vs. 0.6 RBC units; 2000 mL: 2.2 vs. 1.1 RBC units; 3000 mL: 3.4 vs. 1.6 RBC units). Thus, CS was significantly associated with a reduced number of allogeneic RBCs by 40% for 1000 mL, 49% for 2000 mL, and 52% for 3000 mL of blood loss compared to patients without CS. CONCLUSIONS: Cell salvage was significantly associated with a reduced number of allogeneic RBC transfusions. It supports the beneficial effect of CS in cardiac surgical patients as an individual measure in a comprehensive PBM program.

Effectiveness of Preoperative Iron Supplementation in Major Surgical Patients With Iron Deficiency: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of routine intravenous iron in surgical patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). BACKGROUND: Anemia is the most common medical disease in the world and is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Iron deficiency (ID) is the main cause for anemia and constitutes a potentially preventable condition with great impact on surgical outcome. METHODS: In this prospective single-center observational study, surgical patients were screened for the presence of anemia and ID. Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 study groups: A- (no anemia); A-, ID+, T+ (no anemia, iron-deficient, iron supplementation); A+ (anemia); and A+, ID+, T+ (anemia, iron-deficient, iron supplementation) according to hemoglobin level, iron status, and supplementation with iron. RESULTS: Among 1728 patients, 1028 were assigned to A-; 55 to A-, ID+, T+; 461 to A+; and 184 to A+, ID+, T+. While all iron-supplemented IDA patients required less red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the postoperative period (A+ 42.5% vs A+, ID+, T+ 31.5%), a reduced intraoperative transfusion rate was observed for ID and IDA patients only if iron was supplemented >7 days before surgery. Hospital stay was significantly reduced by 2.8 days in iron-supplemented patients (P < 0.01 comparing 13.9 ±â€Š0.8 days for A+, ID+, T+ vs. 16.7 ±â€Š0.7 days for A+). CONCLUSION: Preoperative IDA management with intravenous iron is effective in improving hemoglobin level, thereby reducing intraoperative RBC transfusion rate particular if iron is administrated >7 days before surgery. Hospital length of stay was reduced in all preoperatively iron-supplemented IDA patients.

Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost-benefit analysis based on a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost-benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a recent meta-analysis including 17 studies (>235 000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed. RESULTS: Iron supplementation was applied in 3·1%, cell salvage in 65% and tranexamic acid in 89% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs €129·04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of €150·64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was €21·60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was €1 878 000 in 100·000 simulated patients. CONCLUSION: Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost-effectively.