Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 61(4): 802-806, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974981

ABSTRACT

Following total joint arthroplasty, surgical site infections (SSI) and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are associated with increased patient morbidity and healthcare utilization. Current positive-pressure surgical sterile helmet system (SHS) were developed as a feasible, useful version of the body exhaust system.The use of SHS has not yet been proven to decrease infection rates in the orthopedic literature. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the infection rates between patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with a surgical team wearing SHS versus without SHS.A retrospective chart review in patients undergoing primary TAA with the surgeon wearing SHS (Group 1) or standard surgical attire (Group 2) was conducted. The primary outcome was postoperative SSI and PJI. The rate of wound complications, revision rates, and associated procedures were also analyzed. We identified 109 patients in Group 1 and 151 patients in Group 2. The rate of SSI was 12.8% in Group 1 and 14.6% in Group 2 (p = .411). The rate of PJI was 0.92% in Group 1 and 2.6% in Group 2 (p = .411). There was no difference in revision rates between the two groups. This study suggests that SHS does not appear to protect against postoperative SSI or PJI after TAA. Conversely, we did not find a higher infection rate compared to standard surgical attire despite recent in-vitro studies suggesting SHS as a source of wound contamination. The utility of SHS does not appear to influence the prevalence of postoperative SSI or PJI.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Ankle , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Head Protective Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
2.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 59(6): 1265-1271, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972848

ABSTRACT

Talar bulk osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment strategy for large, uncontained osteochondral lesions of talus. Complications and high revision rates from osteochondral talar allograft transfer can be common. Talar graft failure is a devastating complication that results from failure of allograft incorporation within the host bone and subsequent resorption and sometimes subsidence can occur. Treatment options and outcomes for graft failure have rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment options and their outcomes for treating talar allograft failure. A systematic review was completed to find all reports of salvage treatments for talar graft failure and outcomes of these reports were analyzed. Eleven studies involving a total of 522 ankles, in 520 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The allograft failure rate was 11.5% in these studies with a reoperation rate of 18.9%. With limited reports, satisfactory outcomes for treatment of graft failure with ankle arthrodesis were 77.3%, 50% for revision allograft procedures, and 50% for total ankle arthroplasty. Considering the large failure rate and reoperation rate for bulk talar allograft transplantations, superior revision, and salvage options are needed. More prospective cohort studies focusing on consistent and standard outcome measures are needed to further assess revision options for failed talar allograft procedures.


Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular , Talus , Allografts , Ankle Joint/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Humans , Prospective Studies , Talus/surgery , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 59(1): 149-155, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753570

ABSTRACT

Reoperation rates and complication rates can be high for patients receiving an osteochondral talar allograft transplant. Complications can include graft failure, delamination of the graft, arthrofibrosis, advancing osteoarthritis, nonunion of malleolar osteotomies, and partial or complete osteonecrosis of the talus. Graft failure refers to failure of graft incorporation with subsequent necrosis and subsidence. Treatment options for talar graft failure are limited, and outcomes for these treatments have rarely been reported. We present a review of the published data on the complications and treatments for failed talar allograft transplantation. A case report is presented on a young woman who experienced graft failure and osteonecrosis of her talar allograft transplant. Because of the size of the present osteonecrosis, an ankle arthrodesis was performed as the initial revision procedure. Talar necrosis was removed and revascularized from the ankle fusion with solid fusion was confirmed with computed tomography. Symptomatic adjacent joint pain quickly developed in the hindfoot after the ankle fusion, and 12 months later an ankle fusion conversion to total ankle arthroplasty was performed. The patient has returned to normal activity with significant reduction in pain at most recent follow-up visit. This patient was followed for 7 years from initial osteochondral talar allograft transplantation and for 2 years from conversion of ankle fusion to total ankle arthroplasty. It is important to understand the techniques, indications, and outcomes for the various revision options for talar allograft failure. This case report illustrates how multiple revision options can be used to provide the best outcome for the patient.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/surgery , Ankle Joint/surgery , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Cartilage, Articular/transplantation , Talus/surgery , Adult , Allografts , Ankle Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Chronic Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reoperation , Talus/diagnostic imaging , Talus/injuries , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Treatment Failure
4.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 109(1): 80-86, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30964313

ABSTRACT

Plantar plate repairs are challenging procedures because of the small anatomy of the plantar plate. This can make them daunting, time-consuming procedures to perform. Advances in technology, such as interference screws and small suture passers, have created improved technique possibilities to decrease difficulty, correct multiple planes of deformity, create stronger constructs, and improve patient results. The plantar plate repair technique presented in this article includes a dorsal approach with a metatarsal osteotomy, a knotless repair that provides a strong construct to allow patients to protectively bear weight immediately, and can reduce operative time by presenting tips to quickly navigate the procedure. The presented technique allows for detailed correction of all three planes of deformity, maximizing patient results.


Subject(s)
Metatarsophalangeal Joint/surgery , Plantar Plate/surgery , Bone Wires , Humans , Metatarsal Bones/surgery , Osteotomy , Plantar Plate/injuries , Podiatry/methods , Suture Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...