ABSTRACT
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a major sequela of diabetes mellitus and may have a detrimental effect on the gait of people with this complication. DPN causes a disruption in the body's sensorimotor system and is believed to affect up to 50% of patients with diabetes mellitus, dependent on the duration of diabetes. It has a major effect on morbidity and mortality. The peripheral nervous system controls the complex series of events in gait through somatic and autonomic functions, careful balancing of eccentric and concentric muscle contractions and a reliance on the sensory information received from the plantar surface. In this literature review focussing on kinetics, kinematics and posture during gait in DPN patients, we have identified an intimate link between DPN and abnormalities in gait and demonstrated an increased risk in falls for older patients with diabetes. As such, we have identified a need for further research on the role of gait abnormalities in the development of diabetic foot ulceration and subsequent amputations.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment regimen for correcting vitamin D insufficiency in diabetic patients has not been established. METHODS: Two hundred and forty four adult diabetic patients with vitamin D insufficiency were enrolled to receive: Ergocalciferol (D2) 50,000 IU daily over 10 days (500,000 IU) followed by Calcichew D3 (calcium carbonate/Cholecalciferol) BID (~24,000 IU cholecalciferol/month) (ECC) (n=53); Cholecalciferol (D3) 40,000 IU daily over 10 days (400,000 IU) followed by Calcichew D3 BID (~24,000 IU cholecalciferol/month) (CCC) (n=94) or Cholecalciferol 40,000 IU daily over 10 days (400,000 IU) followed by Cholecalciferol 40,000 IU monthly (CC) (n=97). The 25(OH)D, HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure and eGFR were assessed at baseline and after a mean follow up of 8.0±4.0 months. RESULTS: Treatment increased 25(OH)D concentrations significantly in ECC (17.4±13.8 vs 29.9±9.6 ng/ml, P<0.0001), CCC (14.2±6.6 vs 30.9±13.1 ng/ml, p<0.0001) and CC (13.5±8.4 vs 33.9±14.4 ng/ml, P<0.0001). The relative increase in 25(OH)D was significantly lower with ECC compared to CC (+14.6±12.2 vs +20.6±15.0, P=0.01) and the majority of subjects in the ECC group (63%) remained vitamin D deficient (25(OH)D <30 ng/ml) compared to CCC (46%) and CC (36%) (P=0.0005). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that relatively aggressive treatment regimens of both vitamin D2 and D3 increase 25(OH)D concentrations in diabetic patients, but the ability to raise 25(OH)D status to 'sufficient' levels is inadequate in a large proportion of individuals.
