Drugs, gene transfer, signaling factors: a bench to bedside approach to myocardial stem cell therapy.

In the past few years, the dogma that the heart is a terminally differentiated organ has been challenged. Evidence from preclinical investigations emerged that there are cells, even in the heart itself, that may be able to restore impaired cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Although the exact mechanisms by which the infarcted heart can be repaired by stem cells are not yet fully defined, there is a new optimism among cardiologists that this treatment will prove successful in addressing the cause of heart failure after myocardial infarction-myocyte loss. Despite the promising preliminary data of human myocardial stem cell trials, scientists have also focused on the possibility of enhancing the underlying mechanisms of stem cell repair to gain healthier myocardial tissue. Attempts to induce neo-angiogenesis by transfecting stem cells with signaling factors (such as VEGF), to raise the number of endothelial progenitor cells with medical treatments (such as statins), to transfect stem cells with heat shock protein 70 (as a cardioprotective agent against ischemia) and to enhance the healing process after myocardial infarction with the use of various forms of stimulating factors (G-CSF, SCF, GM-CSF) have been made with notable results. In this article, we summarize the evidence from preclinical and clinical myocardial stem cell studies that have addressed the possibility of enhancing the regenerative capacity of cells used after myocardial infarction.

Remote ischaemic postconditioning protects the heart during acute myocardial infarction in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic preconditioning results in a reduction in ischaemic-reperfusion injury to the heart. This beneficial effect is seen both with direct local preconditioning of the myocardium and with remote preconditioning of easily accessible distant non-vital limb tissue. Ischaemic postconditioning with a comparable sequence of brief periods of local ischaemia, when applied immediately after the ischaemic insult, confers benefits similar to preconditioning. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that limb ischaemia induces remote postconditioning and hence reduces experimental myocardial infarct size in a validated swine model of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Acute myocardial infarction was induced in 24 pigs with 90 min balloon inflations of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Remote ischaemic postconditioning was induced in 12 of the pigs by four 5 min cycles of blood pressure cuff inflation applied to the lower limb immediately after the balloon deflation. Infarct size was assessed by measuring 72 h creatinine kinase release, MRI scan and immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: Area under the curve of creatinine kinase release was significantly reduced in the postconditioning group compared with the control group with a 26% reduction in the infarct size (p<0.05). This was confirmed by MRI scanning and immunohistochemical analysis that revealed a 22% (p<0.05) and a 47.52% (p<0.01) relative reduction in the infarct size, respectively. CONCLUSION: Remote ischaemic postconditioning is a simple technique to reduce infarct size without the hazards and logistics of multiple coronary artery balloon inflations. This type of conditioning promises clear clinical potential.