Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. A retrospective analysis of the implementation of tumor board recommendations in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have shown that elderly cancer patients were denied optimal anticancer treatment because of age. Colorectal cancer is among the most frequent cancers in Western countries, and adjuvant chemotherapy has proven efficacy and tolerance in this condition. This study was undertaken to explore the current approaches to adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly cancer patients in a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients' files that were discussed in the gastro-intestinal tumor board of the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg during 3 years (2004-2006). The recorded variables included sex, age, tumor stage, cancer location colon vs rectum, number of comorbidities, occurrence of an oncogeriatric assessment, type and tolerance of chemotherapy. We investigated the reason to not administer adjuvant therapy in patients whom should have received this treatment if guidelines had to be applied. RESULTS: A total of 193 consecutive patients' files were extracted from colorectal cancer patients that had been discussed in the gastro-intestinal tumor board. Among these, we isolated patients over 70 years old who were proposed with either adjuvant chemotherapy (group A, n=65) or follow up (group B, n=128). The median age in group A was 75.3 years old. Tumor board recommendations were in accordance with guidelines in 91% of cases. Chemotherapy was delivered in 44 pts (76%) and completed in 42 (95%). The median age in group B was 78.6 years old, and in this group tumor board proposal met the guidelines in 83% of cases. In the logistic regression model, disease stage was the major variable leading to adjuvant treatment recommendation, age and comorbidities being of lesser importance. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, elderly colorectal cancer patients are not undertreated. Efforts should be maintained to educate physicians with regard to feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with Crohn's disease compared with small bowel adenocarcinoma de novo.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) in Crohn's disease (CD) come from case reports and small retrospective series. The aim of this study was to further describe SBA in patients with CD and compare it with SBA de novo. METHODS: Twenty patients with CD with SBA recruited in French university hospitals were studied and compared with 40 patients with SBA de novo recruited from a population-based registry. SBA occurred after a median time of 15 years of CD and was located within the inflamed areas of the ileum (n=19) or jejunum (n=1), whereas in patients with SBA de novo, it was distributed all along the small intestine. Median age at diagnosis of SBA was 47 years (range, 33-72 yr) in patients with CD and 68 years (range, 41-95 yr) in those with SBA de novo. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of SBA, assessed in a subgroup of patients, was 0.2% and 2.2% after 10 and 25 years of ileal CD, respectively. SBA accounted for 25% and 45% of the risk of gastrointestinal carcinoma after 10 and 25 years of CD, respectively. Diagnosis was made preoperatively in 1/20 patients with CD and 22/40 patients with SBA de novo. Signet ring cells were found in 35% of patients with CD but not in patients with SBA de novo. Relative survival was not significantly different in these 2 categories of patients (54 versus 37% and 35 versus 30% in patients with and without CD at 2 and 5 yr, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SBA in CD is different from SBA de novo. It arises from longstanding ileal inflammation and is difficult to diagnose. SBA cumulative risk increases after 10 years of CD and is likely to cause premature mortality in patients with early-onset CD.