Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Aust Health Rev ; 47(4): 456-462, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37183004

ABSTRACT

Objective This case study describes the development and outcomes of a new integrated and multidisciplinary care pathway. Spearheaded by allied health, the 'COVID community navigator team', applied established principles of reverse triage to create additional surge capacity. Methods A retrospective cohort study examined workflow patterns using electronic medical records of patients who received navigator input at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between 20 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Results There were 437 eligible patient encounters identified. On average patients stayed 4.15 h in the emergency departments (ED) (s.d. = 4.31) and 9.5 h (s.d. = 10.9) in the short stay unit. Most patients were discharged into a 'low risk pathway' with community general practitioner follow up. Of discharged patients, only 38 re-presented to the ED with symptoms related to their initial COVID-19 diagnosis (34.9% of total re-admissions). Of these re-admissions, more than half did not require admission to a ward. Conclusion The findings presented here provide support for the clinical utility of a multidisciplinary reverse triage approach in surge planning for anticipated presentation peaks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Triage , Humans , Triage/methods , Retrospective Studies , Critical Pathways , COVID-19 Testing , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals
2.
Aust Occup Ther J ; 69(5): 536-545, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35502588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Delivering high-intensity occupational therapy can improve functional outcomes for patients and reduce length of stay. However, there is little published evidence of this in the aged rehabilitation setting. This study aims to explore the association between intensity of occupational therapy interventions and functional outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with adult inpatients admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation program. The intervention was the intensity of occupational therapy measured as high (≥30 minutes per day) versus low (<30 minutes per day). The primary outcome measured was change in functional performance, defined as a minimum of half a point improvement in the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and/or the Lawton and Brody Scale of Instrumental ADL (IADL) at admission to rehabilitation, discharge and 3months post-discharge. RESULTS: A total of 693 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 82.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 7.9), 57% were females, and 64% had cognitive impairment. Patients (n = 210) who received greater than or equal to 30 minutes of occupational therapy daily were more likely to have clinically relevant functional improvements.; for both ADL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-2.83) and IADL (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.96-4.61), after adjusting for age, sex, severity of function (ADL ≤ 2) at admission, frailty and cognitive impairment. Improvements in ADL and IADL were maintained for at least 3 months following discharge. CONCLUSION: This study found that geriatric rehabilitation inpatients who received higher intensity of occupational therapy interventions were more likely to functionally improve than those who received lower intensity. Further research is required to determine if other factors, such as therapy type, influence functional outcomes.


Subject(s)
Occupational Therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Aftercare , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies
3.
Aust Health Rev ; 44(1): 52-55, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30621851

ABSTRACT

Objective Staff turnover remains a significant financial burden across the healthcare sector. Traditional approaches to recruitment continue to prioritise competency-based outcomes over the cultural fit of applicants. This brief case study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a new recruitment intervention on allied health staff attrition rates at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia. Methods The study used a single-site, prospective, mixed-methodology research design. Staff attrition rate, defined as the number of staff who ceased employment within 12 months of starting (both voluntarily and involuntarily), was selected as the primary outcome measure. Baseline data were collected in the 12 months before intervention roll out. Data were supplemented by surveying staff on interview panels and by feedback from consumer interview panel members. Results Descriptive analysis revealed that there was a decrease in the overall staff attrition rates following the introduction of the new recruitment model. Survey data revealed that interviewers rated the new recruitment strategy as more effective than traditional approaches. Several unique benefits associated with the inclusion of consumer advocates were also identified. Conclusion A behaviourally grounded recruitment approach to allied health improves overall staff attrition over traditional competency-based models.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Personnel Selection , Personnel, Hospital , Public Health , Adult , Clinical Competence , Cultural Competency , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Victoria
4.
Trials ; 16: 133, 2015 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25873250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disinvestment from inefficient or ineffective health services is a growing priority for health care systems. Provision of allied health services over the weekend is now commonplace despite a relative paucity of evidence supporting their provision. The relatively high cost of providing this service combined with the paucity of evidence supporting its provision makes this a potential candidate for disinvestment so that resources consumed can be used in other areas. This study aims to determine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of the current model of weekend allied health service and a new stakeholder-driven model of weekend allied health service delivery on acute medical and surgical wards compared to having no weekend allied health service. METHODS/DESIGN: Two stepped wedge, cluster randomised trials of weekend allied health services will be conducted in six acute medical/surgical wards across two public metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne (Australia). Wards have been chosen to participate by management teams at each hospital. The allied health services to be investigated will include physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, dietetics, social work and allied health assistants. At baseline, all wards will be receiving weekend allied health services. Study 1 intervention will be the sequential disinvestment (roll-in) of the current weekend allied health service model from each participating ward in monthly intervals and study 2 will be the roll-out of a new stakeholder-driven model of weekend allied health service delivery. The order in which weekend allied health services will be rolled in and out amongst participating wards will be determined randomly. This trial will be conducted in each of the two participating hospitals at a different time interval. Primary outcomes will be length of stay, rate of unplanned hospital readmission within 28 days and rate of adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be number of complaints and compliments, staff absenteeism, and patient discharge destination, satisfaction, and functional independence at discharge. DISCUSSION: This is the world's first application of the recently described non-inferiority (roll-in) stepped wedge trial design, and the largest investigation of the effectiveness of weekend allied health services on acute medical surgical wards to date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613001231730 (first study) and ACTRN12613001361796 (second study). Was this trial prospectively registered?: Yes. Date registered: 8 November 2013 (first study), 12 December 2013 (second study). Anticipated completion: June 2015. Protocol version: 1. Role of trial sponsor: KP and DL are directly employed by one of the trial sponsors, their roles were: KP assisted with overall development of research design and assisted with overall project management; DL contributed to project management, administration and communications strategy.


Subject(s)
After-Hours Care/organization & administration , Allied Health Personnel/organization & administration , Occupational Therapy/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Physical Therapy Modalities/organization & administration , Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Surgical Procedures, Operative/rehabilitation , After-Hours Care/economics , Allied Health Personnel/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Health Status , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Length of Stay , Models, Organizational , Occupational Therapy/economics , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Patient Satisfaction , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/economics , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Research Design , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Victoria
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...